Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,747 results
0.55s
District Court, W.D. Washington · Sep 5, 2024
The 4 party asserting jurisdiction has the burden of establishing it. See United States v. … This assertion does not 11 establish that he is a qualified individual with a disability; that the services he was allegedly denied 12 were reasonable accommodations that he needed in order to enjoy meaningful access
Cited 0 timesUnknownHarborview Fellowship v. Inslee
District Court, W.D. Washington · Dec 9, 2020
Chen also moved for qualified immunity. After the Plaintiff 11 clarified that it is only making claims against Dr. Chen in his official capacity, Dr. … Chen 12 acknowledged that a ruling on qualified immunity is not appropriate at this time.) 13 II. DISCUSSION 14 A.
Cited 0 timesUnknown417 F. Supp. 471 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Jan 2, 1975
Rainier were not clearly observable to the crew of the aircraft between the time of takeoff and the happening of the accident. … the changes, if any, were in fact clearly observable to the crew of 41C. 22.
Cited 32 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Feb 19, 2026
Code § 72.10.9 5 Sanchez does not respond to Defendants’ arguments regarding qualified immunity, see 6 generally Dkt. … upon 19 whether or not the constitutional right allegedly violated was clearly established at the time”); see 20 also Wash.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMedicraft v. State of Washington
District Court, W.D. Washington · May 23, 2023
City of Boise, Idaho, 623 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2010) (noting that 19 qualified immunity is a pure question of law and that Ninth Circuit may consider … In Desmet, the Washington 25 Supreme Court emphasized that the scope of the immunity is narrow and that “[t]his court has 26 established that
Cited 0 timesUnknownDe Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington
District Court, W.D. Washington · Apr 26, 2023
Most of these facts are clearly at issue in the pending summary judgment 12 motion, and defendants selected documents and information in their … to inquire whether other, less 14 15 supportive documents exist and/or to test defendants’ assertions regarding statutory 16 compliance and immunities
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Jan 29, 2024
Id. 17 Finally, the R&R explains the stringent “deliberate indifference standard” 18 necessary to establish an Eighth Amendment violation and concludes that both Holdway 19 and Duncan are entitled to qualified … immunity given White Eagle’s failure to submit 20 evidence that the defendants personally participated in the allegations.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownCard v. Tacoma Municipal Court
District Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 11, 2022
Moreover, he must clearly identify each named 3 defendant’s involvement in the constitutional violation for which he is suing that specific 4 defendant. See Arnold, 637 F.2d at 1355; Rizzo v. … See Botello, 413 F.3d at 975-76 (stating that when 8 prosecutors perform administrative or other investigative functions, only qualified 9 immunity is available, and that the court looks at the nature of the function
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Jul 8, 2022
Accordingly, even if a 11 constitutional violation were established, Defendants would be entitled to summary judgment 12 based upon qualified immunity. 13 In sum, the … Alternatively, 2 Defendants argue they are entitled to summary judgment based on qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPickens v. Virginia Mason Franciscan Health
District Court, W.D. Washington · Nov 8, 2022
Dismissal of these claims is clearly warranted. health professional. RCW 71.05.153(3) and (4). … The ITA 9 provides qualified immunity to those providing care and taking actions under the statute.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJugum v. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp.
646 F. Supp. 764 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Sep 29, 1986
The Court disagrees, for the reasons clearly stated in the Order dated May 27, 1986, and for the reasons stated below. … RCW 30.22.020 explains that one of the purposes of the chapter is to “qualify and simplify the law concerning the respective ownership interests of individuals to funds held on deposit by financial institutions ...
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna