Case law

Preston v. SB&C Ltd

District Court, W.D. Washington · May 12, 2025

A patient must be notified if they do not qualify for Charity Care and 17 may appeal that denial. Id. (citing Wash. Admin. … —collectively 18 establish that a debt buyer must have actual ownership of the debt. See, e.g., Wash. Rev.

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Olympic Game Farm Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 8, 2022

Although there was no regulatory standard to cite, the practice 8 was clearly not acceptable to the inspector. … The Washington Supreme Court has since clarified that simply 21 showing that the challenged conduct is unlawful does not establish a nuisance per se.

City of Seattle v. Monsanto Company

District Court, W.D. Washington · Aug 28, 2023

For a public nuisance 2 claim, the City must establish conduct constituting a nuisance. See Miotke v. … The Fisher Study’s results clearly indicate 21%—or 69 out of 325 respondents— 5 reported fishing for LDW resident species. (See Goutman Decl., Ex. K at 51.)

Shaffstall v. Old Dominion Freight Line Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 30, 2020

In his declaration, Plaintiff does not clearly identify 21 how his disability impacted his ability to perform his duties. (See generally Dkt. No. 53.) … The Court concludes that although 13 Plaintiff has established element (4), Plaintiff has not established elements (5) or (6). 14 1.

Regal West Corporation v. Nguyen

District Court, W.D. Washington · Sep 30, 2019

A prima facie showing means that the 15 plaintiff has produced admissible evidence, which, if believed, is sufficient to establish the 16 existence of personal jurisdiction. Ballard v. … This establishes that Nguyen purposely directed 5 his activities at Washington State. See Mee Indus., Inc. v. Adamson, No. 218CV003314CASJCX, 6 2018 WL 6136813, at *4 (C.D. Cal.

Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jan 31, 2025

His medications are of limited effectiveness, cause dizziness, 17 tiredness, brain fog, and lower his immune system. AR 56. He has 12 to 15 symptom flareups a 18 month which leave him bedridden from pain. AR 64. … Accordingly, after a claimant has established a 4 diagnosis of fibromyalgia, a longitudinal review of the record is required whenever possible.

Colchester v. Lazaro

District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 3, 2022

Remis, 415 F.3d 1028, 1035 (9th Cir. 2005). 20 This is sufficient to establish legal prejudice. … He argues that there are 24 1 qualified psychologists in Spain and that Respondent can use her expert to conduct the 2 evaluation remotely or

Cortland v. Pierce County

District Court, W.D. Washington · Sep 21, 2020

limited sway here. 23 24 1 Cortland’s numerous filings do not clearly … specifically revealed to the public and that it appears to 12 duplicate that being withheld.”). 13 Cortland’s response relies on a FOIA case holding that “materials normally immunized

International Mezzo Technologies Inc v. Airborne ECS LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington · Oct 8, 2025

“[D]elay alone is not sufficient to establish 10 prejudice, nor is a need for additional discovery.” … The parties dispute 21 whether current products differ from alleged prior art products and whether those 22 sales qualify as invalidating.

White v. Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Company

District Court, W.D. Washington · Aug 3, 2022

“[A] civil RICO plaintiff must show: (1) that 18 his alleged harm qualifies as injury to his business or property; and (2) that his harm was by 19 reason of the RICO violation, which requires the plaintiff to establish … Further, reliance has clearly been deemed not to be an element for a claim 12 involving omissions. See Deegan, 197 Wn.

Nienaber v. Overlake Hospital Medical Center

District Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2024

to establish a breach of that duty. … Defendant argues that Plaintiff has failed to establish injury to her 13 business or property. Dkt.

Downey v. Judge

District Court, W.D. Washington · Sep 11, 2025

Court screened the initial complaint and found several deficiencies. 11 In particular, the initial complaint (A) raised unrelated claims against different defendants in a 12 single action, (B) named improper and (C) immune … unit (in this case, Snohomish County) may be sued in a § 1983 action. 8 With respect to Defendant “Medical,” Plaintiff does not clearly

Ma v. Densmore

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jun 30, 2021

Ma must file a submission with the Court clearly establishing his proper service 16 of the summons and copy of the complaint on WCS Defendants. 17 (2) Failure to State a Claim … Ma must file a submission with the Court clearly 3 establishing his proper service. 4 (2) Walden University’s Motion to Strike and Dismiss (Dkt. # 83) is GRANTED. 5

Still v. City of Longview

District Court, W.D. Washington · Aug 2, 2024

Again, I say: A problem pervasive enough to have culminated in 14 criminal behaviors qualifies the necessity for change. … Because clearly there are people 15 who aren’t doing their jobs.

In Re Cray Inc.

431 F. Supp. 2d 1114 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Apr 28, 2006

Servs., 500 U.S. 90, 96 , 111 S.Ct. 1711 , 114 L.Ed.2d 152 (1991) (Rule 23.1 “clearly contemplates both the demand requirement and the possibility that demand may be excused, [but] it does not create a demand requirement … Directors were privy to inside information concerning “the complete absence of the Company’s internal controls and the difficulties Cray was encountering producing and qualifying its new products” as a result of their positions

CLM Trading LLC v. United States of America

District Court, W.D. Washington · Oct 14, 2022

In determining whether an applicant qualifies for authorization, FNS is required 21 to consider several factors, including “the [applicant’s] business integrity and reputation.” 7 22 U.S.C. § 2018(a)(1)(B)(v). … Plaintiff’s 6 interpretation would exclude all sorts of fraud clearly contemplated by this provision, such as 7 fraud on the government, and SNAP fraud as well.

Johansen v. EFinancial LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jan 18, 2022

DNC Compliance Procedures. 4 Defendant has submitted declarations from employees and training materials in support 5 of its contention that it complies with the provisions of the TCPA and qualifies … 15 the button used to submit information, clearly states that by submitting information to request a 16 life insurance quote, the person “consent[s] to receive offers of insurance from Efinancial, LLC 17 at the . .

Marquez Vargas v. RRA CP Opportunity Trust 1

District Court, W.D. Washington · Aug 29, 2024

The second issue—whether RRA, as a possessor of a home 8 equity line of credit, qualifies as a “beneficiary” under the DTA—presents questions of local law 9 that have not been clearly determined. … Section 19.16.440’s directive 2 satisfies the first two elements, and Marquez Vargas’ allegations plausibly establish the third.

Canyon Park Business Center Owners' Association v. Buttigieg

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jun 28, 2022

Specifically, 2 Federal Defendants assert that Canyon Park’s “allegations of injury from increased traffic 3 and traffic congestion in and around the [Business Park]” do not qualify as an injury to 4 the environment … Canyon Park’s complaint fails to 4 demonstrate that the members would have standing to sue in their own right. 5 Furthermore, regarding prudential standing, Canyon Park asserts in its Response 6 that “its members clearly

Drammeh v. Uber Technologies Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington · Sep 27, 2022

Taser Int’l, Inc., 684 F.3d 941, 948 (9th Cir. 2012). 19 Plaintiffs are clearly offering the post-incident reports to prove that Uber knew or … Further, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to 6 establish that Defendants had a duty of care.