Case law

State v. Wilson

100 Wash. App. 44 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 21, 2000

Here, JST is clearly a victim. … Wilson-Farler’s bank records and discover deposits of funds embezzled from the victim in order to establish *52 the victim’s loss. The connection to the embezzlement is established. C.

Kammerer v. Western Gear Corp.

27 Wash. App. 512 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 7, 1981

Any facts tending to establish a party's theory, or to qualify or disprove the testimony of an adversary may be relevant. The relevancy of evidence lies within the discretion of the trial judge. Lamborn v. Phillips Pac. … Further, they had owned and licensed many patents and could be considered qualified to state an opinion as to the value of the patents by virtue of this experience.

State v. Newcomb

160 Wash. App. 184 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Feb 17, 2011

“The issue is whether the State has sufficiently countered Defendant’s claim that there are no material disputed facts and that the undisputed material facts do not establish a prima facie case of guilt.” … The State argues persuasively that even if Kredlo had no possessory interest in the easement itself, he had a possessory interest in the improvements he paid for and that these improvements qualify as the “property of another

State Of Washington, V. Anthony Sean Peluso

Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 6, 2022

You can clearly see the bond they have built since he has started with the [parenting sentencing alternative] program. . . . … receipt of an alternative sentence on those counts for which he was qualified.

Parker v. United Airlines, Inc.

32 Wash. App. 722 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 4, 1982

In the case at bar, the trial court's order clearly shows that the parties appeared and that the trial court considered all pleadings, briefs, and affidavits of the parties. … Supreme Court December 17, 1982. 1 After an extensive investigation, United found that Parker had kept for herself money collected as payments for Red Carpet memberships and that she had allowed a number of persons other than qualified

Eyle v. Department of Labor & Industries

10 Wash. App. 449 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 18, 1974

Eyle died. 2 Clearly, however, the trial court determined *451 and the record supports a finding that Radine Eyle was disqualified from being considered a beneficiary under the act because of the provisions of RCW 51.08.020 … The court also held that the mother’s subsequent relinquishment of her right to custody and control and authorization for adoption did not qualify the children as beneficiaries under another subdivision (forerunner of subdivision

Dinitia Harris, V. Federal Way Public Schools

Court of Appeals of Washington · Feb 28, 2022

WIAA training clearly states to assume [sudden cardiac arrest] in a collapsed and unresponsive athlete with seizure-like activity. i. … WE CONCUR: 6 In other limited liability statutes the legislature has spelled out that immunity applies to both employers and employees.

Northwest Gas Ass'n v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission

141 Wash. App. 98 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 2, 2007

into account the public interest. ¶43 The Pipelines asked the trial court to enjoin the WUTC from disclosing the shapefile data under RCW 42.56.540, which protects public records from disclosure when “examination would clearly … The legislature’s use of the conjunctive “or” clearly indicates its intent that “maintaining” records to mitigate or to respond to terrorist acts is sufficient to qualify that information for the security exemption, even

Espinoza v. City of Everett

87 Wash. App. 857 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 8, 1997

Although never clearly explained, the crux of the City’s argument is apparently that the legitimacy of plaintiffs’ claim could not be discerned by inspecting the demand letter. … Although this issue was discussed in the trial court proceedings, the plaintiffs waited until their reply brief to make any argument as to how the City’s immunity could be overcome.

State v. NB

112 P.3d 579 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 31, 2005

. ¶ 12 Finally, N.B. contends that the disposition of 126-156 weeks was "clearly excessive" because the evidence established only that he needed two years of treatment. … s request, the court entered an order granting him use immunity for statements made during the predispositional evaluation. See State v. Decker, 68 Wash.App. 246 , 842 P.2d 500 (1992).

Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar Association

198 Wash. App. 758 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 2, 2017

WSBA dismissed all claims for damages based on GR 12.3 's grant of immunity to the WSBA and its employees. … The Supreme Court qualified its ruling by noting it did not reach the question of whether the doctrine of res judicata foreclosed any portions of the litigation.

State v. Statler

160 Wash. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 15, 2011

Significantly, Grier also recognizes that “[n]ot all strategies or tactics on the part of defense counsel are immune from attack.” … Statler cannot establish prejudice.” Majority at 636.

Pannell v. Food Services of America

61 Wash. App. 418 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 29, 1991

Tradewell first argues that the sentence containing the words "equally-qualified employees" was misleading. … This was a judgment clearly falling within *448 the trial court's discretion. Tradewell's argument against the award cannot be sustained.

Vasquez v. STATE, DSHS

94 Wash. App. 976 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 6, 1999

Exhaustion is required when: (1) a claim is cognizable in the first instance by an agency alone; (2) the agency has clearly established mechanisms for the resolution of complaints by aggrieved parties; and (3) the administrative … Glassen clearly believed Detective Perez’s investigation was abusive and wrong, but there is no indication he opposed it on grounds of unlawful discrimination. Mr.

Matter of Detention of Chorney

64 Wash. App. 469 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 31, 1992

Thus, the statute establishes procedures to protect a good faith voluntary patient from being compelled to submit to involuntary treatment. … This treatment alternative was clearly unreasonable.

Northwest Gas Ass'n v. WASHINGTON UTILITIES & TRANSP. COM'N

168 P.3d 443 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 2, 2007

into account the public interest. ¶ 42 The Pipelines asked the trial court to enjoin the WUTC from disclosing the shapefile data under RCW 42.56.540, which protects public records from disclosure when "examination would clearly … The Legislature's use of the conjunctive "or" clearly indicates their intent that "maintaining" records to mitigate or to respond to terrorist acts is sufficient to qualify that information for the security exemption, even

State v. Green

230 P.3d 654 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 11, 2010

Clearly our legislature's intent in enacting our sex offender statute was similar to the intent of California's statute. … But the dissent fails to sufficiently demonstrate that the legislature clearly intended to establish a discrete "unit of prosecution" every 90 days.

State v. Gassman

160 Wash. App. 600 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 15, 2011

Significantly, Grier also recognizes that “[n]ot all strategies or tactics on the part of defense counsel are immune from attack.” … Gassman cannot establish prejudice.” Majority at 612.

Shoop v. Kittitas County

108 Wash. App. 388 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 10, 2001

The court stated, “Clearly, this is jurisdictional language.” … Kittitas County argues that the State’s sovereign immunity can be overcome only by a specific statutory grant of “jurisdiction.”

Betts v. Betts

3 Wash. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jul 20, 1970

The conjunction of establishing a home in Washington and the intention to remain permanently in this state is sufficient to establish domicile in Washington. In re Mullins, 26 Wn.2d 419 , 174 P.2d 790 (1946). … The child was clearly a dependent child even though the order entered after the juvenile court hearing did not spell out the conditions which created the status of dependency.