Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,562 results
0.44s
957 P.2d 781 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 21, 1998
The value of the land was established at a jury trial. … The relocation benefits statute, RCW 8.26.035, clearly contemplates reimbursement instead of, or at least as an alternative to, advancement.
Cited 14 timesPublished113 Wash. App. 746 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 30, 2002
McMahon that clearly answers the question of whether one seeking damages for emotional distress need witness the accident: A bright-line rule that limits recovery for emotional distress to those who witnessed the accident … most favorable to the insured applies. 12 “An ambiguity exists only ‘if the language on its face is fairly susceptible to two different but reasonable interpretations.’ ” 13 The policy states that in order for Mitchell to qualify
Cited 0 timesPublished262 P.3d 128 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 20, 2011
He did not qualify for Social Security disability, and he was able to continue working. … Yet, the legislature has clearly stated its goal of maintaining residential continuity in the children's lives.
Cited 81 timesPublishedRichards v. Overlake Hospital Medical Center
59 Wash. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 17, 1990
In fact we agree with the conclusion that misconduct has not been established. … Clearly, however, it would be prejudicial misconduct for a lawyer to emphasize his or her professional expertise and then to cite specific examples in an effort to influence other jurors.
Cited 64 timesPublished95 Wash. App. 883 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 28, 1999
The issue in Beach was whether a verbatim record of proceedings was required to establish an adequate record for review. … The court, however, qualified its holding, noting that not all conceivable uses allowed by the laws in effect at the time of application vested, but only those “specific use[s]” disclosed in the application.
Cited 21 timesPublishedRichard Wilkinson v. Washington Medical Commission
Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 16, 2025
The Respondent has clearly violated commonly accepted standards of honesty. … Wilkinson’s favor even if the blog qualifies as the practice of medicine.
Cited 0 timesPublished59 Wash. App. 236 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 17, 1990
In imposing that liability, the Callan court held that in enacting the state liquor act, RCW Title 66, the Legislature "established [minors] as a protected class". … The statute clearly prohibits giving or supplying liquor to minors.
Cited 6 timesPublished137 P.3d 892 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 29, 2006
By contrast, for a defendant to qualify for a deferred conviction in district court, he is required by statute not only to stipulate to the admissibility of police reports, but also to the sufficiency of the facts contained … It was for the trial court, not us, to weigh the sufficiency of the uncontroverted evidence. [12] Here, the trial court performed its jobit clearly weighed the uncontroverted evidence and found it sufficient proof beyond
Cited 59 timesPublishedState of Washington v. Jose G. Barboza-Cortes
425 P.3d 856 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 30, 2018
Conclusory generalizations about criminal activity are inadequate to establish probable cause. Thein, 138 Wn.2d at 147-48. … He expressly eschewed reliance on the financial information prong of the statute because the information on the fraudulent check clearly was false.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Washington · Nov 22, 2019
They also assert that they clearly showed that active efforts were made to facilitate visitation to the extent possible. … Both ICWA and WICWA require that before a court can involuntarily terminate the parental rights of a parent of an Indian child, the petitioning party must provide “testimony of a qualified expert witness” establishing beyond
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEvergreen Moneysource Mortgage Co. v. Shannon
167 Wash. App. 242 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Feb 16, 2012
To establish a claim under the CPA, Evergreen must demonstrate that the alleged misconduct impacted public interest. ¶62 “The [first] two elements may be established by a showing that (1) an act or practice which has a capacity … The public interest element of the Hangman Ridge test may be established in one of two different ways. Id. at 789 .
Cited 17 timesPublishedKS Tacoma Holdings, LLC v. Shorelines Hearings Board
166 Wash. App. 117 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 24, 2012
To qualify as an “aggrieved” person for purposes of establishing its standing under the SMA, KS Tacoma must put forth factual allegations demonstrating the following conditions: (1) The agency action has prejudiced or is … feasible consistent with the overall best interest of the state and the people generally. ¶18 RCW 90.58.020’s hierarchy of land use preferences and stated policy of protecting the public’s enjoyment of our State’s shorelines clearly
Cited 21 timesPublishedSwanson Hay Company v. Employment Security Department
Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 31, 2017
Dep 't not meet their burden of demonstrating that the owner-operators' services qualify for the narrow exemption from unemployment insurance tax liability for payments to sufficiently independent enterprises. … It rejected states~ arguments that their laws of general applicability were immune from preemption.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Of Washington, Resp. v. Daniel J. Perez, App.
Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 3, 2014
This does qualify as a startling event and that the injuries are a startling condition. … The record establishes not only a medical emergency but also concerns for the safety of other inmates and corrections officers. See Bryant. 131 S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBelleau Woods II, LLC v. City of Bellingham
150 Wash. App. 228 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 26, 2009
Credit for the dedication of land shall be valued at fair market value established by private appraisers acceptable to the City. … language of the ordinance does not require such an interpretation. ¶18 The hearing examiner ended by ruling that park “impact fees for the subject development shall be paid in accordance with BMC Chapter 19.04, with credit for qualifying
Cited 12 timesPublishedZipporah Maina, V . State Of Washington, Dshs
Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 13, 2023
Assuming without deciding that Linden Grove is a long-term care facility, RCW 70.129.140(2) does not immunize Maina from a finding of neglect. … The EAJA authorizes an award of attorney fees to “a qualified party that prevails in a judicial review of an agency action . . . unless the court finds that the agency action was substantially justified or that circumstances
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedDoe v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood Bank
55 Wash. App. 106 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 11, 1989
Doe is a hemophiliac who contracted the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) as a result of using blood products contaminated with the human immunodeficiency virus. … that respondent lacked standing to bring this action, establish why respondent's action was not warranted by law.
Cited 44 timesPublished77 Wash. App. 74 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Feb 27, 1995
If the owner is unable to establish a taking under this analysis, we proceed to the due process analysis. … As noted above, this interest is clearly legitimate. To further this interest, it passed the Ordinance in an effort to preserve increasingly scarce mobile home lots.
Cited 14 timesPublishedQuadrant Corp. v. American States Ins. Co.
76 P.3d 773 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 22, 2003
The Washington Supreme Court's decision in Kent Farms allowing coverage despite the pollution exclusion establishes that the Insureds' argument is incorrect. … These clauses were clearly intended to exculpate insurance companies from liability for massive environmental cleanups required by CERCLA and similar legislation.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTeri Collier, V. Wa State Dept Of Health Nursing Comm.
Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 22, 2024
They assert that prior rulings applied to all the issues under the theory of collateral estoppel, that Collier has not sufficiently pled the elements of her claims, and that quasi-judicial immunity and statutory immunity … The record also establishes that the administrative hearing was a sufficient forum to litigate the issue and Collier presents no argument otherwise.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna