Case law

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Deming

108 Wash. 2d 82 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1987

We would reverse these cases out of hand if they were suits of a civil nature to establish a claim against petitioners. … The commission shall establish rules of procedure for commission proceedings including due process and confidentiality of proceedings.

State v. Cheatam

150 Wash. 2d 626 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 11, 2003

This conclusion is correct, since the jail property room was clearly not the place designated in the warrant as the place to be searched. … His shoes were clearly observable by the police during that search.

Roller v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

24 Wash. 2d 473 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1946

The question clearly gets down to: Was the vehicle an automobile-or a truck? … Plaintiff called Walter Mitchell, a supervisor of repairs in a Longview auto repair shop, and qualified him as an expert witness.

State v. Larson

Washington Supreme Court · Dec 24, 2015

As an example, we point to RCW 9A.52.060, also discussed further below, in which the legislature clearly criminalized possession of burglar tools "under circumstances evincing an intent to use" and "knowing that the same … But in Cenatis, use of a "booster bag" was found to qualify as an "antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure." Cenatis, 120 So. 3d at 43-44.

State v. Hieb

107 Wash. 2d 97 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1986

These three statements clearly qualified as hearsay. … The presence of blood in the dents in the walls, the size of the dents, and the presence of bruises on the child's scalp clearly indicate that the dents were caused by Addy Kay's head, not by a rubber ball.

State v. Lee

87 Wash. 2d 932 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1976

Const. amend. 14 provides: No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without … Page 1, however, describes each page of the exhibits and the attestation and certification clearly apply to the subsequent pages. [6] Each exhibit satisfied the requirements of Burgett v.

Henderson Homes, Inc. v. City of Bothell

124 Wash. 2d 240 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1994

We will summarize or paraphrase other findings of fact which demonstrate clearly that there was a total lack of compliance with the statute. … (c) If the developer qualifies the response in any way pursue it until the 'damning admission’ is elicited.

Harris v. Department of Labor & Industries

120 Wash. 2d 461 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1993

Accordingly, the Department *485 has established procedures for placing the worker on the pension rolls retroactively. Clerk's Papers, at 39. … Congress intended for qualified workers to receive federal benefits upon their retirement, unless specific provisions of the Social Security Act provide otherwise.

Myers v. Little Church by the Side of the Road

37 Wash. 2d 897 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1951

As Labatt states: “It would clearly be inconsistent with the rationale of the defense of assumption of risks to regard it as being ap *909 plicable in cases where, through mere inadvertence at the time of the accident, the … No effort was made to qualify appellant as an expert in the interpretation of X rays. Proper objection, on the ground of the lack of qualifications of the witness, was made to the question which elicited this testimony.

Washington State Labor Council v. Reed

65 P.3d 1203 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2003

The secretary of state then certified Referendum 53 as supported by a sufficient number of signatures of registered voters to qualify for the November 5, 2002, ballot. … Because of our abiding devotion to separation of powers, we must ask, where is the check if the legislature is at leave, without effective review, to declare any law immune from the people's constitutional power of referendum

Fluke Corp. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.

145 Wash. 2d 137 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 21, 2001

The insurance provision is clear and the type of coverage well established, and the only Washington case that has considered such coverage accepted its validity. … Given the clarity of that promise, the trial court focused on the qualifying phrase "because of ... injury ... arising out of ...

State v. Sum

Washington Supreme Court · Jun 9, 2022

This factor clearly favors recognition. … Sum, No. 99730-6 know the deputy’s race does not negate the relevance of Sum’s race, which is clearly established by the record and undisputed on appeal.

State v. Ollivier

Washington Supreme Court · Oct 31, 2013

Balancing the Factors Balancing the Barker factors clearly weighs against the defendant. … Qualifying Information Sufficient To Establish Probable Cause The trial court determined that when the false information was omitted, there was sufficient qualifying information in the affidavit to establish probable

In re Det. of Reyes

Washington Supreme Court · Sep 24, 2015

The petition relied on the residential burglary, which involved a sexual attack, and a prior conviction for child rape as qualifying sexually violent offenses. … Further, I agree with the lead opinion that the release of a transcript to D.F .F. is clearly not a sufficient remedy.

State v. Ollivier

Washington Supreme Court · Oct 31, 2013

Balancing the Factors Balancing the Barker factors clearly weighs against the defendant. … Qualifying Information Sufficient To Establish Probable Cause The trial court determined that when the false information was omitted, there was sufficient qualifying information in the affidavit to establish probable

State v. King

167 Wash. 2d 324 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 15, 2009

Clearly, this *335 situation presented an emergency, and Quinn reasonably responded across jurisdictional lines.” … The district court found the State had not established there was a valid interlocal agreement authorizing the arrest under RCW 10.93.070(1).

Viking Properties, Inc. v. Holm

155 Wash. 2d 112 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 18, 2005

“Appurtenant” has a clear and long-established meaning: “annexed or belonging legally to some more important thing. . . incident to and passing in possession with real estate . . . .” … While the substantive due process claims asserted by Viking clearly have continued validity, see Mission Springs, Inc. v.

Snohomish County v. Public Utility District No. 1

105 Wash. 2d 606 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1986

We wanted, first, to establish once and for all that vital statistics — birth, death and marriage records — were public documents. … It had never occurred to us that they were not, and now we had the opportunity to establish a precedent of substance.

Specialty Asphalt & Constr., LLC v. Lincoln County

421 P.3d 925 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 26, 2018

The court in Skyline appropriately relied on principles established by this court. In Mottner v. … The negligent misrepresentation claim clearly survives summary judgment; the breach of contract claim clearly fails on summary judgment.

State Ex Rel. Chelan Electric Co. v. Superior Court

142 Wash. 270 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1927

The inadequacy of use by the general public is a test universally established. Clark v. Nash, 198 U. S. 361 ; Strickley v. Highland Boy Mining Co., 200 U. S. 527 . … From these cases it will be seen clearly that article XXI of our constitution does not conflict with the Federal constitution.