Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,545 results
1.03s
In Re the Determination of the Rights Ex Rel. the Waters of Sinlahekin Creek
162 Wash. 635 · Washington Supreme Court · May 15, 1931
The lands of the reclamation district were decreed to be in class 15, and it was accordingly awarded right in the waters of Sinlahekin creek to the extent of 200 cubic feet per second for 10,000 acres of land, qualified as … We think the decree has worked as nearly exact justice as it is possible under the much involved, and, in *644 many particulars, not in this record clearly proven, facts.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOmega National Insurance v. Marquardt
115 Wash. 2d 416 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1990
This court considers the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution cOid the privileges and immunities clause of the Washington Constitution substantially identical and they are … The facts of the Calfarm case are clearly distinguishable from those of the present case in that nothing in the rule challenged in the present case forces insurers to write polices for which they do not receive a fair return
Cited 66 timesPublishedCowan v. C., M., ST. P. & PAC. R.
55 Wash. 2d 615 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1960
The party producing the witness must show he is qualified. Tully v. … Even if erroneous, it was not prejudicial, because the basic facts of the plaintiff's case were established by other testimony without the opinion of Kusian as to the concentration of the gas.
Cited 7 timesPublished79 Wash. 2d 755 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1971
Ses., ch. 282, § 4, p. 2745, the King County Assessor submitted a comprehensive revaluation plan to the Department of Revenue in order that King County may qualify for funding of the revaluation program. … This purpose is clearly defined in RCW 84.41.010 which declares in part: Traditional public policy of the state has vested large measure of control in matters of property valuation in county government, and the state hereby
Cited 19 timesPublished56 Wash. 2d 48 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1960
Instead, it immunized employers covered by the federal act from state regulation and thus denied to small employers the equal protection of the laws. … Very clearly, the Federal Act could only be permissive never mandatory.
Cited 47 timesPublishedFields v. Wash. Dep't of Early Learning
434 P.3d 999 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2019
. ¶ 48 However, the hearings Fields has been given clearly satisfy the requirements of procedural due process. … Fields does not currently have a CROP, and whether or not Fields would qualify for a CROP is an open question.
Cited 25 timesPublished129 Wash. 2d 130 · Washington Supreme Court · May 16, 1996
He had been advised he could not disclose them because they were work product, and petitioners clearly knew he had been so advised because he told them so. … This record does not conclusively establish what DNR knew or whether information gathered by Mr. Buske or others was forwarded or not.
Cited 57 timesPublishedKing County v. Friends of Sammamish Valley
Washington Supreme Court · Sep 19, 2024
Unless the facts show 3 “The board shall consist of five members qualified by experience or training in pertinent matters pertaining to land use law or land use planning and who have experience in the practical … The Board’s contrary reading is clearly erroneous. D.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBiggers v. City of Bainbridge Island
169 P.3d 14 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 11, 2007
matter that qualifies for the award of attorney fees and costs. … The administration of the system so established shall be performed exclusively by the local government. " (Emphasis added.)
Cited 3 timesPublished12 Wash. 2d 686 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1942
His position as the real proponent of the final report had already been clearly established; he had been afforded a full opportunity to explain and defend his acts; and he will therefore not now be heard to assert a purely … technical claim of immunity from the jurisdiction of the court.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn Re the Salary of the Juvenile Director
87 Wash. 2d 232 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1976
When the director was hired in 1973, his initial salary was established by agreement between the State, County, Superior Court, and the director. … No showing was made that other qualified employees could not be obtained at the salary established by the county commissioners. In 1974, when the director was hired, 13 applicants sought the position.
Cited 110 timesPublished93 Wash. 2d 368 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1981
I The majority contends at page 382-83: Since [the regulation of the State Human Rights Commission] prevents preemployment inquiries based on height and weight in virtually all situations, the regulation in effect establishes … In our view, however, the designation of any additional categories of protected persons is clearly a legislative function.
Cited 83 timesPublished52 Wash. 2d 181 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1958
It is provided in the act that qualified voters of the proposed city or town equal in number to twenty per cent of the votes cast at the last state election may petition for incorporation. … Where the validity of a statute is assailed, there is a presumption of the constitutionality of the legislative enactment, unless its repugnancy to the constitution clearly appears or is made to appear beyond a reasonable
Cited 26 timesPublished116 Wash. 2d 174 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1991
The officer shall inform the person of his or her right to refuse the breath or blood test, and of his or her right to have additional tests administered by any qualified person of his or her choosing as provided in RCW 46.61.506 … The statute and case law clearly distinguish between these two terms in the vehicular homicide context. See State v. Eike, 72 Wn.2d 760, 765 , 435 P.2d 680 (1967); State v. Knowles, 46 Wn.
Overruled on other grounds by State v. Berlin, 133 Wash. 2d 541 (1997)Cited 64 timesPublished62 P.3d 470 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 30, 2003
This letter contained several qualifiers to which the executive director alerted appellant organizations. … The statutory provisions are clearly referenced in section 906(7).
Cited 1 timesPublished51 Wash. 2d 763 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1958
As the press has business aspects, it has no special immunity from laws applicable to business in general.... … We cannot give some constitutional rights a preferred position without relegating others to a deferred position; we can establish no firsts without thereby establishing seconds.
Cited 17 timesPublished92 P.3d 228 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 24, 2004
Thompson's use of the boathouse was clearly dependent upon the permission of the owners, i.e., his parents. … The items discovered in the boathouse following a lawful consent to search by Thompson's father together with the items found in open view on the property clearly established probable cause for the search warrant independent
Cited 96 timesPublished77 Wash. 182 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1913
But the competency of the witnesses on direct examination was clearly shown. North Coast R. Co. v. Gentry, 58 Wash. 82 , 107 Pac. 1060 . … The appellants cite cases to the effect that it is the established rule that property devoted to a public use may not be taken for another public use without legislative grant, either in express terms or by necessary implication
Cited 15 timesPublishedHarbour Village Apts. v. City of Mukilteo
989 P.2d 542 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1999
Clearly, they are engaged in the business of renting dwelling units. [7] Under the plain language of RCW 35A.82.020, Mukilteo's authority to "impose excises for regulation or revenue" for "all ... kinds of business ... and … As the RDU fee meets the legitimate purposes of both revenue raising and regulation, it cannot be said to be wholly arbitrary, thus it cannot be shown to violate federal equal protection or our State's privileges and immunities
Cited 19 timesPublishedSouthwest Washington Chapter, National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Pierce County
100 Wash. 2d 109 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1983
The County has established the following objective measurement of good faith. … Any program satisfying the more stringent requirements of Fullilove clearly satisfies this mid-tier test.
Cited 53 timesPublished
Ask Donna