Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,545 results
1.94s
Sterling Realty Co. v. City of Bellevue
68 Wash. 2d 760 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1966
Several preliminary and underlying propositions have been established by our cases and statutes, however. … This statute clearly governs noncontinuous improvements only. It furnishes no support for the city’s argument in the present case, which concerns dividing a continuous improvement into units.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCity of Yakima v. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters
117 Wash. 2d 655 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1991
Since 1980, PERC's hearing examiners and its board have consistently interpreted the proviso to mean that a civil service commission must be similar in scope, structure and authority to qualify a city for exemption from bargaining … The state personnel board members are appointed by the Governor, subject to confirmation by the Senate. 36 Persons so appointed shall have clearly demonstrated an interest and belief in the merit principle, shall not hold
Cited 73 timesPublished118 Wash. 2d 596 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1992
When compared to the cases in which coercion was found, the alleged compulsion here is too conditional and not sufficiently immediate to qualify as coercive. … excessive or clearly too lenient.
Cited 215 timesPublishedWashington Supreme Court · Jun 26, 2014
Police officers certainly qualify as public servants under the statute. … Clearly, the legislature did not adopt this statute with the intent that ejusdem generis apply.
Cited 0 timesPublished177 Wash. 2d 263 · Washington Supreme Court · May 2, 2013
Similarly, RCW 35.20.250 establishes “concurrent jurisdiction with the superior court and district court...” on the part of the municipal court. … Id. at 269-71. ¶40 Of course there is such language — when the legislature amended these two statutes by changing “the court” to “the superior court,” the legislature clearly inserted language discriminating between defendants
Cited 10 timesPublishedPuget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. Moos
92 Wash. 2d 939 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1979
regulations for conservation purposes, and that allocation as contemplated by the District Court's order would constitute a violation of equal protection and provide Indian fishermen with unconstitutional special privileges and immunities … The United States Supreme Court has clearly ruled, however, that the Indian treaties of the 1850's reserve to the signatory tribes a right to fish that nontreaty fishermen do not enjoy. 443 U.S. at 681 , 99 S.
Cited 41 timesPublishedAmerican Star Insurance v. Grice
121 Wash. 2d 869 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1993
Since the extrinsic evidence does not clearly indicate that coverage is excluded, we construe the ambiguity in favor of the insureds and reverse the summary judgment in favor of the insurers. … The insurers argue that this new "absolute" pollution exclusion (as contrasted with the older "qualified" pollution exclusions construed in United Pac. Ins. Co. v. Van's Westlake Union, *877 Inc., 34 Wn.
Cited 102 timesPublishedState v. 119 Vote No! Committee
957 P.2d 691 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1998
Yet nowhere does the majority opinion reveal the holding of New York Times , which is "a public official cannot recover for defamation unless he or she establishes the defendant made the defamatory statement with actual malice … The Oregon standard is a very difficult one to establish, but still provides that factually false statements may be actionable.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAnderson v. Soap Lake Sch. Dist.
423 P.3d 197 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 9, 2018
Lukashevich was qualified under the WIAA standards. … But that does not immunize the school district from all tort liability. Instead, the school district remains liable for harm caused by direct breaches of its own duties.
Cited 41 timesPublished2 Wash. 638 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1891
There was only one way by which Catheriúe T. could have become entitled to 320 acres under the donation act, and that was to have married some qualified donation applicant prior to December 1, 1851. This she did not do. … The main question in controversy in that case was, as to whether the land in controversy was brought under the operation of the town-site act by the organic law of August 14, 1848, establishing the territorial government
Cited 7 timesPublished76 Wash. 2d 130 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1969
Defendant Davis, was aware that there were no corporate bank accounts established for the corporation, nor corporate minutes nor corporate account ledgers, nor written agreements between the corporation and any grower or … RCW 23.01.080 clearly and unambiguously imposed a duty upon the officers and directors of an infant corporation, and created a .liability in the event of a breach of that *139 duty.
Cited 2 timesPublished164 P.3d 475 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 2, 2007
In contrast, it is well established that the operation of an electric utility is a proprietary activity. … In Algona, we concluded that the doctrine of governmental immunity from taxation barred the city of Algona from levying a tax on King County's solid waste facility.
Cited 80 timesPublishedKovacs v. Dep't of Labor & Indus.
Washington Supreme Court · Jul 14, 2016
The Department ofLabor and Industries initially found that Kovacs qualified for benefits, which he began to receive. … Read in isolation, it does not clearly establish whether the statute oflimitations begins to run on the day of the injury or the next day.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChandrruangphen v. City Of Sammamish
Washington Supreme Court · Feb 12, 2026
In her view, if the City’s e-mail does not qualify as “mail” 37 Wanthida Chandrruangphen v. … An e-mailed written decision, sent only to an applicant’s attorney, does not qualify as a “publicly available” decision.
Cited 0 timesPublished166 Wash. 2d 229 · Washington Supreme Court · May 21, 2009
The legislature clearly contemplated that there would be times demand would not be made and did not, as they could, require dismissal. … It also specifically found that “[b]ackdating options qualifies as one of those ‘rare cases [in which] a transaction may be so egregious on its face that board approval cannot meet the test of business judgment, and a substantial
Cited 16 timesPublishedGrammer v. Skagit Valley Lumber Co.
162 Wash. 677 · Washington Supreme Court · May 19, 1931
But this contract clearly evidences that the real function plaintiff was required to perform under the contract was to procure a purchaser. He had no other duty to perform. … Cas. 1914C 1239, we said: “By an unbroken line of decisions we have held that, to meet this statute, the writing evidencing the agreement must be so complete in itself as to make a resort to parol evidence to establish any
Cited 33 timesPublished910 P.2d 447 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1996
Nowhere does the statute imply a radio interception demands a second conveyance to qualify as a transmission. … Having determined the method of interception falls under the act, the question remains whether the form of communication qualified as "private." See RCW 9.73.030(1)(a).
Cited 44 timesPublishedChristie v. the Port of Olympia
27 Wash. 2d 534 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1947
If, as the *542 evidence amply establishes, it was necessary for the Port of Olympia to pay wages equal to those paid by the members of the association in order to get qualified longshoremen during the period from 1934 to … Clearly, such power was, in *547 the language of Dillon, quoted in the opinion, “essential to the declared objects and purposes of the corporation.”
Cited 21 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Carter v. Superior Court
18 Wash. 2d 130 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1943
The relator, Carter, is the duly elected and qualified treasurer of King county. He was charged, tried, and convicted on eight counts for violations of § 1 of chapter 72 of the Laws of 1941, p. 187 (Rem. … That could have been ac *136 complished more readily and clearly by omitting the section entirely. It is true that notice connotes something different from summons in our practice.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. American Automobile Insurance v. Fishback
154 Wash. 297 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1929
$2,768,660.35; that, since entering the state of Washington, it has expended large sums of money in building up its business and good will within the state, has paid losses within the state in excess of $1,000,000, has established … Such a situation would clearly violate both the letter and the spirit of the constitutional provision already quoted. *303 We think our earlier eases distinguished in the Fibreboard case are controlling here.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna