Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterswash

3,545 results

1.08s

  • Lindblom v. Johnston

    92 Wash. 171 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1916

    On the day named, he qualified as such by giving bond to the United States in the penal sum of $20,000, conditioned for the faithful performance of his duties. His sureties on the bond were Erik O. … Clearly, in equity, he is in no position to complain of their neglect.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Gottstein v. Lister

    88 Wash. 462 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1915

    The question of compensation was, perhaps, less intimately and necessarily connected with the change to biennial sessions, yet it was clearly connected with it. … It makes him, in effect, *479 a branch of Congress, though only to a limited and qualified extent.”

    Cited 59 timesPublished
  • Markham Advertising Co. v. State

    73 Wash. 2d 405 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1968

    Subsection (e) of the 1965 federal statute establishes a 5-year grace period for compliance. … The plaintiffs’ business is clearly one which involves a substantial public interest, and one which the state, under the police power, may appropriately regulate.

    Cited 106 timesPublished
  • Vanhorn v. Nestoss

    99 Wash. 328 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1918

    The plaintiffs in this case are minors, and bring the action by their guardian ad litem for the purpose of having a sale of real estate in a guardianship proceeding declared illegal and void, and for the purpose of establishing … Sections 222 and 223 of the act indicate clearly that it should not be given such a retroactive effect.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Corkery v. Hinkle

    125 Wash. 671 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1923

    It is the case to which we have already referred as. extending the doctrine somewhat beyond that established by the cases which we have cited from other jurisdictions. Ford v. … The purpose to accomplish the latter result must clearly appear, and we find no such purpose in the record. As Judge Holcomb said, in the case of White v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Adamant Plaster Manufacturing Co. v. National Bank of Commerce

    5 Wash. 232 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1892

    In fact, if the original contract was qualified by the oral agreement entered into at the time it was executed as contended for by the plaintiff, it is so unreasonable to suppose that the plaintiff would have voluntarily … plaintiff seems to have thought itself entitled to the entire cost of the labor and material in filling such irregularities with the adamant plaster, but as it was its duty to have filled the same with common lime mortar, it clearly

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In RE MEMPA v. Rhay

    68 Wash. 2d 882 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1966

    Perhaps in one sense the significant characteristic of the probation device is that the person who is fortunate enough to qualify and to have been granted probation status is allowed to be at liberty in the community. … In the state of Washington the legislature has established a state probation system and has provided for its functions, operations, and administration.

    Reversed by Mempa v. Rhay, 389 U.S. 128 (1967)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Volk v. DeMeerleer

    187 Wash. 2d 241 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2016

    Admission is proper provided the expert is qualified and his or her testimony is helpful. Id. … In fact, we clearly stated that whether the patient is an inpatient or an outpatient is immaterial. Id.

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • State v. Stubbs

    170 Wash. 2d 117 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 7, 2010

    excessive or clearly too lenient. … Likewise, the loss of a leg, a “significant permanent loss ... of the function of [a] bodily part,” would qualify as “great bodily harm”; but so would paraplegia.

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.

    86 Wash. 2d 664 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1976

    The evidence in the record does not clearly establish a constant annual natural run size. On the contrary, the record indicates that the run size varies from year to year. … The record clearly establishes that approximately 75 percent of the Department of Game’s total revenue is derived from license fees.

    Vacated on other grounds by Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of Washington, 433 U.S. 165 (1977)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • City of Des Moines v. Hemenway

    73 Wash. 2d 130 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1968

    It therefore is our judgment that a third-class city may not exercise the power of eminent domain beyond its corporate limits without clear legislative authority, either expressly conferred or clearly implied. … It is one thing for a municipality to attempt to establish services beyond its corporate limits, and it is quite another for a municipality to attempt to establish services within its corporate limits which are to be utilized

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • State v. Ish

    170 Wash. 2d 189 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 7, 2010

    Brittanee testified that his comments did not seem out of touch with reality and that he clearly recognized the members of Hall’s family who were there. ¶4 When police officers arrived they found Ish on the front porch, sitting … cross-examination in order to impeach Otterson. 3 ¶10 The State, on the other hand, wanted to reference Otterson’s agreement to tell the truth during its case in chief. 4 Over objection, the court concluded that the State could establish

    Cited 130 timesPublished
  • State v. Lindberg

    125 Wash. 51 · Washington Supreme Court · May 14, 1923

    In the statute before us no qualifying words are employed. One who sells, gives, or barters intoxicating liquor to an Indian or one of mixed blood, is guilty. … But clearly this court cannot give heed to arguments of this sort. It would be to presume that the trial judge was capable of' being intimidated.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • State v. Pugh

    167 Wash. 2d 825 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 31, 2009

    The statements qualify as res gestae under the res gestae doctrine as it applied at the time the state constitution was adopted. Statements of this type do not implicate the state confrontation clause. … Although the court in Ortego cited a United States Supreme Court opinion for this proposition, it clearly meant that it applies under the state constitution because the court had already recognized in its opinion that the

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • In Re McIntire's Estate

    178 Wash. 81 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1934

    An exemption of gifts to literary, educational and charitable corporations will apply only to corporations established by the laws of the state imposing the tax, and will not apply to a foreign corporation even if it carries … Holcomb, supra [ 85 Kan. 178 , 116 P. 251 ] it was said: "`Provisions giving immunity from taxation are to be strictly construed, and anyone claiming that he should escape his share of the public burden must show a clear

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • City of Seattle v. Pullman

    82 Wash. 2d 794 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1973

    It is true that Drew involved loitering in "suspicious circumstances" but if the term "loiter" is deemed vague when attached to such a qualifying phrase, it certainly is no more precise standing alone. … The United States Supreme Court in Prince clearly recognized this distinction.

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • Clausen v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.

    174 Wash. 2d 70 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 15, 2012

    Although fee-shifting in this context may have a *79 punitive feel, it serves to compensate the seaman for being forced to bring an action to recover what he was clearly entitled to all along. ¶19 At common law, an award … Because seamen do not qualify for state or federal worker compensation, their only recourse from being abandoned when sick or injured on the job is maintenance and cure.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • State v. Gonzales-Morales

    979 P.2d 826 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1999

    Under RCW 2.43.080, "[a]ll language interpreters serving in a legal proceeding, whether or not certified or qualified, shall abide by a code of ethics established by supreme court rule." … The purpose of this Code of Conduct is to establish and maintain high standards of conduct to preserve the integrity an independence of the adjudicative system.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Beach v. City of Seattle

    85 Wash. 379 · Washington Supreme Court · May 6, 1915

    The question of respondent’s contributory negligence was also one clearly for the jury. … It is not claimed, and in view of the other injuries clearly' established by the evidence it could not be claimed, that the verdict was excessive.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Larson v. City of Shelton

    37 Wash. 2d 481 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1950

    Rep. 478 , Judge Cooley makes this statement: "That the regulation of hawkers and peddlers is important if not absolutely essential may be taken as established by the concurring practice of civilized states. … The purpose of enacting chapter 144, Laws of 1945, is clearly set out in the title thereto: "An Act relating to certain veterans; providing for the relief of the same; prescribing the duties of certain officers; providing

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.