Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterswash

3,545 results

0.72s

  • State v. Johnson

    124 Wash. 2d 57 · Washington Supreme Court · May 26, 1994

    We must then have a fair definition of "gang” and must determine that criminal activity by individuals or groups constituting a gang is clearly established by competent evidence upon the record. … Presumably he qualified under ER 702 as “a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education” to "testify ... in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”

    Cited 125 timesPublished
  • State v. Olsen

    180 Wash. 2d 468 · Washington Supreme Court · May 15, 2014

    To determine whether a past conviction qualifies, courts use the “categorical approach.” Id. … Ed. 2d 607 (1990) (establishing the categorical and modified categorical approaches to the ACCA).

    Cited 100 timesPublished
  • In Re Gallinger's Estate

    31 Wash. 2d 823 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1948

    Upon the filing of the petition, an ex parte order was entered granting special letters of administration to Vogleson, who qualified by filing his oath and bond. September 5, 1947, C.B.W. Raymond, attorney for Mr. … Gallinger, I remember very clearly, said `Here is the key —' [Interpolation by counsel and court] Q.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Kirkman

    19 Wash. 605 · Washington Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1898

    The will was presented for probate and duly proved and established in the probate department of the superior court. No order was made by the court providing for notice to creditors. … Smith, 62 Tex. 251 , it was held that, where a will is made under the statute, and the executor has qualified as therein required, the estate is withdrawn from the jurisdiction and control of the county court. ...

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • City of Spokane v. County of Spokane

    146 P.3d 893 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 16, 2006

    Yet "`the presence of a comma before the qualifying phrase is evidence the qualifier is intended to apply to all antecedents instead of only the immediately preceding one.'" … Therefore, it was not necessary for the District Court to be a party to an agreement establishing a new municipal court and establishing that Spokane municipal criminal cases will be filed in that court. ¶ 28 In sum, we reverse

    Cited 104 timesPublished
  • State v. Atsbeha

    142 Wash. 2d 904 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 1, 2001

    (dissenting) — The issue is whether evidence of brain damage is relevant to establish diminished capacity to form criminal intent. … The Court of Appeals was clearly correct in its finding that Mr.

    Cited 171 timesPublished
  • State v. Great Northern Railway Co.

    98 Wash. 197 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1917

    Section 24 of initiative measure No. 3 is cited as recognizing the immunity of interstate commerce shipments in providing that the act shall not apply to shipments transported by any common carrier in unbroken packages of … Unless such state of facts were established, the seizure was illegal.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Morales

    173 Wash. 2d 560 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 26, 2012

    Such testimony is clearly hearsay because the witness testifies to what the interpreter asserts the other party said.’ ” Huynh, 49 Wn. App. at 203 (quoting State v. Lopez, 29 Wn. … The test will be admissible if the person establishes the general acceptability of the testing technique or method.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • City of Spokane v. Spokane County

    158 Wash. 2d 661 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 16, 2006

    Yet “ ‘the presence of a comma before the qualifying phrase is evidence the qualifier is intended to apply to all antecedents instead of only the immediately preceding one.’ ” Berrocal, 155 Wn.2d at 593 (quoting Sehome Park … Therefore, it was not necessary for the District Court to be a party to an agreement establishing a new municipal court and establishing that Spokane municipal criminal cases will be filed in that court. ¶29 In sum, we reverse

    Cited 103 timesPublished
  • State v. Cross

    156 Wash. 2d 580 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 30, 2006

    However, an Ohio statute immunized witness testimony, meaning self-incrimination was not possible as a matter of law. … Cross has not established that the Washington death penalty is unconstitutional.

    Cited 135 timesPublished
  • State v. Griffith

    52 Wash. 2d 721 · Washington Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1958

    It was established that this rifle was owned by appellant’s uncle. Mr. Donald F. … There was no proper foundation laid to qualify this witness to express an opinion as to the mental condition of the appellant on the day in question.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. Brower

    39 Wash. 2d 372 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1951

    This rule is so well established that it is deemed unnecessary to cite sustaining authority." In the case of Berry v. … As mentioned above, this necessitates extending and qualifying the Upchurch case — extending it to termination cases and qualifying it in such cases by requiring that the unlawful act should involve willful, wanton, and reckless

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Scrivener v. Clark College

    181 Wash. 2d 439 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 18, 2014

    Our case law clearly establishes that it is the plaintiff’s burden at trial to prove that discrimination was a substantial factor in an adverse employment action, not the only motivating factor. … It argued that the other candidates were clearly qualified and were the “best fit” for the college and department. These are vague descriptions.

    Cited 206 timesPublished
  • Lenci v. City of Seattle

    63 Wash. 2d 664 · Washington Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1964

    Dwyer, 56 Wn. (2d) 425, 435, 353 P. (2d) 941 : *672 “Article I, § 12 of the state constitution and the fourteenth amendment to the Federal constitution, prohibiting special privileges and immunities and guaranteeing equal … Hurst, supra, a municipal ordinance, to be judicially pronounced void for unreasonableness, must be clearly and plainly unreasonable.

    Cited 104 timesPublished
  • Stevens v. Naches State Bank

    136 Wash. 137 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1925

    Parker, 121 Wash. 24 , 207 Pac. 1062 , we have established the rule that the husband’s disposition must be in the- interest of the- community, and that a gift of community personal property by the husband is void. … Rue, *144 supra, the property in question was given by the husband to his paramour, which clearly was a fraud upon the- wife. And in Parker v.

    Overruled in part by Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. Outler, 172 Wash. 540 (1933)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Norwegian Lutheran Church v. Wooster

    176 Wash. 581 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1934

    , maintain and conduct seminaries, colleges, academies, schools, hospitals and other benevolent institutions; to establish, maintain and conduct home and foreign missions; to establish, maintain and conduct homes for orphans … work carried on *591 in connection therewith, if it can be segregated, is clearly entitled to exemption under the terms of the statute.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. Baik

    55 P.3d 619 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 17, 2002

    By according the decedent resident status, the Estate would qualify for a unified tax credit of approximately $192,000, instead of the credit of $13,000 applicable to nonresidents. … Relying on clearly established Washington precedent, the Court of Appeals properly concluded that Lawyers Title's reliance on Chae's letter as a guaranty of no ultimate tax liability was not justified because it "failed to

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Garrison

    13 Wash. 2d 170 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1942

    But can that fund “be clearly traced and identified” through all its changes and transitions? … In each of the other two cases cited, it was held that corporate stock remained separate property even though it had substantially appreciated after marriage, but it was either conceded or clearly established that the stock

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Delgado

    148 Wash. 2d 723 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 20, 2003

    If so, then the prior conviction should qualify as a strike even if the caption of the statute under which the perpetrator was convicted is different from an “offense listed.” … that it is to be established without regard to the prior record.

    Cited 253 timesPublished
  • Fleury v. Water District No. 2

    53 Wash. 2d 270 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1958

    hereinafter described as set forth in Resolution No. 2 adopted by the Board of Water Commissioners of the District on the 22nd day of October, 1952, which general comprehensive scheme or plan of water supply was ratified by the qualified … It clearly appears that by stating the nature of the improvement as the word is defined in Webster’s New International Dictionary, supra, it would be difficult for one reading the resolution to misconceive its purpose.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.