Case law

Moreno Fraijo v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Barajas Galvan v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Zamudio Leon v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Rodriguez v. Kijakazi

District Court, E.D. Washington · Dec 1, 2021

seizures occurred when she was not 12 complying with medication or were “true” breakthrough seizures, the ALJ 13 reasonably found that Plaintiff’s seizures were better controlled with medication. 14 The record clearly … Clearly, the seizure medication reduced the 10 severity and frequency of Plaintiff’s seizures.

Calderon v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Cancino Valdovinos v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Flores Limon v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Ibarra Diaz v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Garcia v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Reyna v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Camacho Carrillo v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Vera Esquivel v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Montes v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Zavala Figueroa v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Chavez Mellin v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Yancey v. Kijakazi

District Court, E.D. Washington · Sep 27, 2022

Hunte was not qualified to opine as to the disabling effect of 5 Plaintiff’s ALJ for rejecting Dr. … However, the record in this 10 matter does not clearly support a finding of disability. For instance, a 11 rheumatologist is the specialty practitioner for fibromyalgia. See Revels, 874 F.3d at 12 656, 662.

Leyva Morales v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Diaz-Godinez v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Perez Hernandez v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Rojas v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly