Case law

B & G Enterprises, Ltd. v. United States

48 Fed. Cl. 866 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 22, 2001

FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 127 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) *867 (citing 60 Fed.Reg. 41314). … FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000).

Mobility Systems & Equipment Co. v. United States

51 Fed. Cl. 233 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 11, 2001

See also Lawrence v. Muter Co., 171 F.2d 380, 382 (7th Cir.1948), cert. denied, sub nom. Metropolitan Trust Co. v. Muter Co., 337 U.S. 907 , 69 S.Ct. 1049 , 93 L.Ed. 1720 (1949); Silliman v. … In Farmers & Ginners’ Cotton Oil Company v.

Barnick v. United States

80 Fed. Cl. 545 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 27, 2008

See Mercer v. … Heisig v.

Schow v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 27, 2025

Cir. 2020) (“We review the Board’s determinations of law for correctness without deference to the Board’s decision.”) (citation omitted); Acuna v. Equal Emp. … In that case, the plaintiff’s provisional appointment to ensign was held invalid because he had not been recommended for the appointment by a board of three naval officers or found physically qualified by a board of medical

Haynes v. United States

122 Fed. Cl. 166 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 6, 2015

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days after the Board issues notice ofthe final order or decision ofthe Board. 5 U.S.C. $ 7703(bXrXA). … See Todd v. United States, 386 F.3d 1091, 1094 (Fed.

System Fuels, Inc. v. United States

120 Fed. Cl. 635 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 13, 2015

Brown and Ms. … Brown. 7/22/14 TR at 586–87 (Byrnes); 7/22/14 TR at 613–614 (Brown). iii. The Reasonableness Of Plaintiffs’ Security Costs.

Norris v. United States

39 Fed. Cl. 807 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 11, 1998

Thereafter, plaintiff appealed the Board’s decision to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records requesting to set aside the findings of the Board. … Sammt v. United States, 780 F.2d 31, 32 (Fed.Cir.1985). The presumption of volun-tariness may be “vitiated only when the resignation is submitted under duress____” Christie v.

Adams v. United States

82 Fed. Cl. 558 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 2008

This court lacks jurisdiction to hear claims against individuals, see Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997), states and cities, see Hassan v. … See Moore v.

Jones v. United States

104 Fed. Cl. 92 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 15, 2012

[sic] Benefits Review Board (B.R.B.) and Civil Service Commission (C.S.C.).” Plaintiff seeks $44,588,024.00 in damages in “Cash and Gold ... … United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (Fed.Cir. 1997); Golden Pac. Bancorp v.

Henrikson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2022

Jones v. United States, 30 F.4th 1094, 1100 (Fed. Cir. 2022); Fisher v. United States, 402 F.3d 1167, 1174 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (citing Sawyer v. United States, 930 F.2d 1577 (Fed. Cir. 1991)). … Cl. 1976); see also Boyer v. United States, 323 F. App’x 917, 920 (Fed. Cir. 2009). But here, neither the Board nor its Medical Advisor addressed what the Board seemed to acknowledge was Maj.

Patterson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 11, 2021

A subsequent petition to the corrections board does not toll the running of the limitations period; nor does a new claim accrue upon denial of the petition by the corrections board. Real v. … .”); accord Real, 906 F.2d at 1560; Fuller v. United States, 14 Cl. Ct. 542, 544 (1988). Subsequent review by the ABCMR or equivalent corrections board is permissive rather than mandatory. Hurick v.

Ogunniyi v. United States

124 Fed. Cl. 668 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 19, 2016

Ogunniyi’s motion to reconsider generally repeats his previous filings and submissions to this court and also to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), including tort claims, the same breach of contract allegations … United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (Fed.Cir.1997); Golden Pac. Bancorp v.

Hufford v. United States

87 Fed. Cl. 696 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 29, 2009

The Court of Federal Claims “does not have jurisdiction ‘over tort actions against the United States.’ ” Gimbernat v. United States, 84 Fed.Cl. 350, 353 (2008) (quoting Brown v. … United States (Brown), 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997)). The jurisdiction of this court is limited to claims against the United States. United States v.

Sanders v. United States

32 Fed. Cl. 573 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 13, 1995

eligibility for disability retirement.’ ” Brownfield v. … See, e.g., Anderson v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 178 , 179 n. 2 (1990), aff'd, 937 F.2d 623 (Fed.Cir.1991); Parker v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 974, 976 , 1982 WL 25291 (1982).

Stockton East Water District v. United States

75 Fed. Cl. 321 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 20, 2007

Board. … See California State Water Resources Control Board as Amicus Curiae Supporting Defendant, filed Oct. 10, 2006, at 11. In California v.

Campbell v. States

38 Fed. Cl. 524 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 28, 1997

On June 6, 1956, plaintiff appealed the removal decision to the Civil Service Commission Board of Appeals and Review (the “Board”), which upheld the decision on September 12, 1956. … Subsequently, on October 12, 1956, plaintiff requested reconsideration of the Board’s decision, which was denied. On May 16, 1960, an attorney, on behalf of Ms.

Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United States

67 Fed. Cl. 616 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 15, 2005

Bank, FSB v. … See also Tennessee Valley Auth. v.

Bossenbroek v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 10, 2024

Moran v. … * ************************* Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V.

Ehlers-Noll, GMBH v. United States

40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,874 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 13, 1995

United States v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132, 136 , 39 S.Ct. 59, 61 , 63 L.Ed. 166 (1918); Blount Bros. Corp. v. United States, 872 F.2d 1003, 1007 (Fed.Cir. 1989); Hol-Gar Mfg. Corp. v. … Co. v. United States, 28 Fed.Cl. 572, 578 (1993).

Nguyen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 17, 2024

Moran v. … . * * ************************* Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V.