Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

1.05s

  • Mynette Technologies, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2022

    Steel, 730 F.2d at 1468; Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir. 1992)). “In balancing these conflicting interests the . . . … Steel, 730 F.2d at 1468; Brown Bag Software, 960 F.2d at 1470). This case presents facts analogous to Blackbird Tech. 2016 WL 2904592, at *4–6.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lowry v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 8, 2021

    Motions for Judgment on the Administrative Record The Court of Federal Claims reviews decisions of military correction boards based on the administrative record. Walls v. … Wagner v. United States, 365 F.3d 1358, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (citing Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363, 388 (1957)); Carmichael v. United States, 298 F.3d 1367, 1373– 74 (Fed. Cir. 2002); Voge v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lohman v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 19, 2022

    Barnick v. United States, 591 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (citing Chambers v. United States, 417 F.3d 1218, 1227 (Fed. Cir. 2005)). … Doe v. United States, 132 F.3d 1430, 1434 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (quoting Sanders v. United States, 594 F.2d 804, 813 (Ct. Cl. 1979)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First Nationwide Bank v. United States

    49 Fed. Cl. 750 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 6, 2001

    Accordingly, our discussion in Centex Corp. v. … On December 27, 1988, the Bank Board met to consider the FSLIC’s recommendation that the Bank Board approve MacAndrews’s acquisition of the PEAR I package.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Munilla Construction Management, LLC v. United States

    130 Fed. Cl. 635 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2017

    Katz, Brown Rudnick LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Intervenor. Daniel B. Abrahams, Brown Rudnick LLP, Washington, DC, and Tammy Hopkins, Brown Rudnick LLP, Washington, DC, Of Counsel. … Res., Inc. v. United States, 117 Fed.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Wolfing v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 2, 2022

    See, e.g., Eastman v. United States, 33 Fed. … Ashcroft v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Adkins v. United States

    30 Fed. Cl. 158 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 22, 1993

    See, e.g., Nixon v. … See Rostker v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rosales v. United States

    89 Fed. Cl. 565 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 7, 2009

    Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1456 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“Brown Park ”). … Finally, IBIA also summarily dismissed a case that Walter Rosales and Marie Toggery filed, along with San Diego *572 County and the Board of Directors of the San Diego Rural Fire Protection District, (14) San Diego Cty. v

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Six v. United States

    71 Fed. Cl. 671 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2006

    Alternatively, the court may remand the case to the Board where the Board did not find all facts necessary for a resolution of the plaintiffs claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(2); Santiago v. … to Board where Board did not consider or address the plaintiffs “end-organ damage” in rating the plaintiffs disabilities); see Kirwin v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Minehan v. United States

    75 Fed. Cl. 249 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 26, 2007

    On December 10, 1999, plaintiff formally appealed the denial of her workers’ compensation claim to the DOL Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board (the Board). While her appeal was pending, Ms. … See Brown, 105 F.3d at 623 . In addition, the law is clear that allegations regarding bad faith or fraudulent actions by government officials or agencies do sound in tort. See Franklin Savings Corp. v.

    Cited 247 timesPublished
  • Dillard v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2023

    The Court reviews decisions of military correction boards based upon the administrative record. Walls v. United States, 582 F.3d 1358, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2009). … See Rogers v. United States, 124 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pinckney v. United States

    85 Fed. Cl. 392 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 14, 2009

    Plante v. Jacobs addressed “[substantial performance as applied to construction of a house.” Plante v. Jacobs, 103 N.W.2d at 298 . Vela v. … The plaintiff in Universal Fiberglass Corp. v. United States (Universal Fiberglass) appealed its termination for default to the General Services Administration (GSA) Board of Contract Appeals.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wolfing v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 2, 2022

    See, e.g., Eastman v. United States, 33 Fed. … Ashcroft v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wildman v. United States

    28 Fed. Cl. 494 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 4, 1993

    Plaintiff appeals a decision of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (Board) denying her compensation for alleged gender discrimination. … Anderson v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 178 , 179 n. 2 (1990), aff'd, 937 F.2d 623 (Fed.Cir.1991) (Table). Rogers v. United States, 14 Cl.Ct. 39, 50 (1987).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Hassay v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 23, 2020

    ”); Barnick v. … Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hornback v. United States

    56 Fed. Cl. 359 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 2003

    See id. at 378 n. 8 (citing Brown Park Estates, 127 F.3d at 1459). … Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1456 (Fed.Cir.1997). A continuing claim requires recurring, "individual actionable wrongs.” Brown Park Estates, 127 F.3d at 1459.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dougharty v. United States

    27 Fed. Cl. 436 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 8, 1993

    Windle, the separation authority, approved the board’s finding, but rejected the board’s recommendations. … However, “evidence and argument not presented to the ... board may not now be considered [by the court], absent a showing that the evidence was unavailable below.” Alligood v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hanes v. United States

    44 Fed. Cl. 441 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 6, 1999

    See Adkins v. … See generally Miller v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 107, 121 (1993) (cursory review required for Board to determine whether the waiver of limitations is "in the interest of justice”) (citing Allen v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Slattery v. United States

    53 Fed. Cl. 258 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 14, 2002

    See also Stephenson v. United States, 37 Fed.Cl. 396, 406 (1997). See also Korody-Colyer Corp. v. … See United States v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Crisp v. United States

    34 Fed. Cl. 112 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 7, 1995

    See Fox v. … See Griggs v. Jefferson Bank & Trust Co., 57 S.W.2d 390, 391 (Tex.Civ.App., Texarkana 1933); Brown v. Harris, 7 Tex.Civ.App. 664 , 27 S.W. 45 (1894); Tex.Trust Code § 112.032; 1 A. Scott & W.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.