Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.22s
56 Fed. Cl. 522 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 23, 2002
in Denkler v. … MDB Communications v. U.S.
Cited 18 timesPublished120 Fed. Cl. 85 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 29, 2015
In this regard, the Navy Board is not required to list everything it considers, only the essential facts supporting the denial – the “reasons need not be expressed in great detail.” Boyer v. United States, 323 Fed. … See Strahle v. United States, 602 F.2d 344, 347 (Ct. Cl. 1979); see also Arroyo III v. United States, 116 Fed. Cl. 691, 698 (2014); Cooper v. United States, 113 Fed. Cl. 165, 170-71 (2013); see generally, Grooms v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 1, 2020
Bailey’s motion to supplement the administrative record following a remand to the Air Force Board of Corrections for Military Records (“AFBCMR” or “Board”). See Bailey v. United States, 145 Fed. … Edison Co. of N.Y v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)).2 On remand, the Board explicitly considered whether Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished33 Fed. Cl. 504 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 1, 1995
D'Andrea v. United States, 27 Fed.Cl. 612, 614 , aff'd, 6 F.3d 786 (Fed.Cir.1993); Brundage v. … Under that line of cases, military personnel can proceed in this forum to obtain relief not granted by the review board. See, e.g., Lee v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 654, 657 (1985); DeBow v.
Cited 42 timesPublished46 Fed. Cl. 69 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 7, 2000
Additionally, the Board agreed with the JAG advisory opinion that Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 . … The Board, as with all public administrators, is presumed to have “discharge[d] them duties correctly, lawfully, and in good faith.” See Doe v.
Cited 12 timesPublished72 Fed. Cl. 20 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 19, 2006
See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997). … Cummings v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJ.L. Simmons Co. v. United States
60 Fed. Cl. 388 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 15, 2004
Plaintiff, in turn, appealed each of these matters to the VA’s Construction Contract Appeals Board (the Board). In 1955 and 1956, plaintiff was permitted to appear and present witnesses before the Board. … Corp. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 775 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 15, 2016
Cir. 1998); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621,623 (Fed. Cir.) … (citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621 , 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997))), appeal dismissed, 556 F. App'x 966 (Fed. Cir.2014); Haka v. United States, 107 Fed. Cl. 111,113-14 (20't2); Kam-Almaz v. United States, 96 Fed.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 20, 2023
Sand & Gravel Co. v. … Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d 1295, 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (internal quotes omitted). Plaintiff retired in September 2020 and the Board denied her request for relief in July 2021.
Cited 0 timesPublished124 Fed. Cl. 630 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 15, 2016
Capital Corp. v. United States, 93 Fed. … Edwards v. United States, 22 Cl. Ct. 411, 420 (1991) (citing Essen Mall Properties v. United States, 21 Cl. Ct. 430, 440 (1990); Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. United States, 3 Cl.
Cited 8 timesPublishedAdvanced Government Solutions, Inc. v. United States
123 Fed. Cl. 610 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 19, 2015
Brickwood Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 288 F.3d 1371, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002); see also, e.g., Brown v. McDonald, 591 F. App’x 942, 944 (Fed. Cir. 2014). As the Federal Circuit held in Rice Services, Ltd. v. … FIRESTONE Judge 2 In his concurring opinion in Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished73 Fed. Cl. 508 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 4, 2006
.”); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“The Court of Federal Claims ... lacks jurisdiction over tort actions against the United States.”); LeBlanc v. … United States, 161 F.3d 1372, 1376-77 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1454 (Fed.Cir.1997); Hart v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedJasmine International Trading & Services, Co. W.L.L. v. United States
120 Fed. Cl. 577 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2015
v. … On October 20, 2014, Defendant voluntarily dismissed its counterclaims asserted under the FFCA and the FCA, in light of the Federal Circuit’s ruling in Kellogg Brown and Root Services, Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished48 Fed. Cl. 585 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 24, 2001
Indeed, the promises had to be made to the Board, for only the Board *587 could approve the mergers. … The claims of plaintiffs Jerome Maher and John Gravee that are now before this court were initially raised, by way of counterclaims, in the case cited — FDIC v. Gravee, 966 F.Supp. 622 (N.D.I11.1997).
Cited 5 timesPublishedAmerican Floor Consultants & Installations, Inc. v. United States
70 Fed. Cl. 235 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 14, 2006
Group v. … Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished121 Fed. Cl. 248 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 27, 2015
So long as the Board considered the relevant evidence and came to a reasonable conclusion, this court will not disturb the Board's decision.” Riser v. United States, 97 Fed. Cl. 679, 683– 84 (2011) (quoting Heisig v. … Cir. 2013) (citing Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 310 F.2d at 386–87). Additionally, the court does not sit as “a super correction board.” Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.
Cited 5 timesPublished88 Fed. Cl. 759 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 2009
The Court of Federal Claims “does not have jurisdiction ‘over tort actions against the United States.’ ” Gimbernat v. United States (Gimbernat), 84 Fed.Cl. 350, 353 (2008) (quoting Brown v. … See 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(1); Gimbernat, 84 Fed.Cl. at 353 (citing Brown, 105 F.3d at 623 ). 2.
Cited 47 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · May 22, 2025
, “Military Boards”) and a stay of proceedings. … In SKF USA Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · May 2, 2023
Brown. (alteration added). … Brown and while the total flow in the river was below Mr. Brown’s calculated theoretical peak flow.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouthern California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States
52 Fed. Cl. 531 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 10, 2002
See Winstar Corp. v. … Bank v.
Vacated on other grounds by Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. v. United States, 422 F.3d 1319 (2005)Cited 15 timesPublished
Ask Donna