Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.47s
58 Fed. Cl. 21 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 7, 2003
Bank v. … Haines v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2021
Id.; see, e.g., Reale v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 1010, 1013 (1976) (disavowing the idea of the court operating as “a sort of super Correction Board”); Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 782 (Fed. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublished120 Fed. Cl. 144 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 23, 2015
When challenging the decision of a military corrections board, the plaintiff’s burden is to show, by “cogent and clearly convincing evidence,” Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. … In reviewing a BCNR decision, therefore, this Court does not serve as a “super correction board,” Van Cleave v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 674, 678 (2006) (quoting Skinner v. United States, 594 F.3d 824, 830 (Ct.
Cited 7 timesPublished41 Fed. Cl. 106 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 9, 1998
See, e.g., Adkins v. United States, 68 F.3d 1317 (Fed.Cir.1995); Palmer v. United States, 38 Fed.Cl. 316 (1997); Strickland v. United States, 36 Fed. Cl. 651 (1996). See also 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(2). … See Adkins v. United States, 68 F.3d 1317, 1323-24 (Fed.Cir. 1995), Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 782 (Fed.Cir. 1988), Law v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 382, 391-92 (1992). .
Cited 10 timesPublished40 Fed. Cl. 371 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 20, 1998
Plaintiff relies primarily on Geyen v. Marsh, 775 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir.1985), and Dougherty v. United States Board for Correction of Naval Records, 784 F.2d 499 (3d Cir.1986). … See Kirwin v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSandstone Associates, Inc v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 12, 2019
Frye’s decision by appeal to the Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals or alternatively to the United States Court of Federal Claims. Id. … Court of Federal Claims. 4 See 8x8, Inc. v. United States, 854 F.3d 1376, 1383 n.7 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (CFC lacks jurisdiction over unjust enrichment claims) (citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 6, 2022
Christian v. United States, 337 F.3d 1338, 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (quoting Hary v. United States, 618 F.2d 704, 707 (Ct. Cl.1980)); Rogers v. United States, 124 Fed. Cl. 757, 768 (2016); see also Driscoll v. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 21, 2023
V; Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. … 11 V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedN.R. Acquisition Corp. v. United States
52 Fed. Cl. 490 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 14, 2002
Supermex, 35 Fed.Cl. at 40 (quoting Brown Constr. Trades, Inc. v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 214, 216 (1991)). … Id. at 40 (quoting Brown, 23 Cl.Ct. at 216 ) (citation omitted).
Cited 1 timesPublishedMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. v. United States
50 Fed. Cl. 140 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 6, 2001
Brown & Williamson, Ltd. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 413 , 688 F.2d 747, 750 (1982) (citing United States v. … Brown & Williamson, 688 F.2d at 749 .
Cited 4 timesPublished94 Fed. Cl. 637 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 30, 2010
The Board also found that ESCI’s challenge to the default termination of Contract II was not before the Board in Case No. 54615, but was pending before the Board in Case No. 51722. Id. at 165,979, 165,986 . … The Board stated: "The Government has the common law right of setoff. United States v.
Reversed in part, on other grounds by Nwogu v. United States, 497 F. App'x 952 (2012)Cited 7 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 775 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 15, 2016
Cir. 1998); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621,623 (Fed. Cir.) … (citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621 , 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997))), appeal dismissed, 556 F. App'x 966 (Fed. Cir.2014); Haka v. United States, 107 Fed. Cl. 111,113-14 (20't2); Kam-Almaz v. United States, 96 Fed.
Cited 5 timesPublished29 Fed. Cl. 249 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 30, 1993
The status of record corrections boards in military procedures has been developed in a multitude of cases since the boards were first authorized in 1951. See Sanders v. … United States, 594 F.2d 804 , 219 Ct.Cl. 285 ; Yee v.
Cited 3 timesPublished51 Fed. Cl. 450 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 11, 2002
Frymire addressed an appeal to “The Board of Contract Appeals” and apparently sent the letter to the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals (GSBCA). … Frymire requested that the Board voluntarily dismiss her appeal. Id. On February 2, 1999, the Board dismissed Ms.
Cited 17 timesPublished31 Fed. Cl. 156 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 3, 1994
In his complaint, the plaintiff argues that “[t]he actions of both the Physical Disability Appeal Board (PDAB) and the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) in overruling the Informal Physical Evaluation Board and the Formal Physical … We contend that he would have started drawing [50 percent of his .base pay] several months after the formal Physical Evaluation Board had not the Air Force Review Board reversed the Physical Evaluation Board.
Cited 30 timesPublishedJasmine International Trading & Services, Co. W.L.L. v. United States
120 Fed. Cl. 577 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2015
v. … On October 20, 2014, Defendant voluntarily dismissed its counterclaims asserted under the FFCA and the FCA, in light of the Federal Circuit’s ruling in Kellogg Brown and Root Services, Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRound Place, Inc. v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,699 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 18, 1994
The Wunderlich Act permits the court to determine whether the Board’s legal determinations were erroneous. Maitland Bros. Co. v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 53, 60 (1990), citing National Civil Ser. League v. … A plaintiff challenging the factual findings of a board faces a heavy burden of establishing that the findings are not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Gulf Contracting, Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBLR Group of America, Inc. v. United States
84 Fed. Cl. 634 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 25, 2008
Indeed, decisions of the boards of contract appeals are not binding on the Court of Federal Claims. See Gen. Elec. Co., Aerospace Group v. … Co. v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 25, 2021
See Stein v. United States, 121 Fed. Cl. 248, 266 (2015). In Murphy v. … Accordingly, no basis exists for this Court to overturn the decision of the Board. Haskins v. United States, 51 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 25, 2021
See Stein v. United States, 121 Fed. Cl. 248, 266 (2015). In Murphy v. … Accordingly, no basis exists for this Court to overturn the decision of the Board. Haskins v. United States, 51 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna