Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.70s
72 Fed. Cl. 88 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 28, 2006
In Wood v. … Plaintiff’s argument seems to be that it was improper for the FPEB to make a finding in conflict with the IPEB and wrong for the Board to affirm the FPEB’s finding. We disagree. The Board’s review is de novo, Sawyer v.
Cited 3 timesPublished77 Fed. Cl. 726 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 27, 2007
Tsosie II at 395; Brown v. … Brown v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedHome Federal Bank of Tennessee, F.S.B. v. United States
57 Fed. Cl. 676 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 2003
On December 24, 1981, the Bank Board issued Resolution V-T-M-81-16, approving the merger of Home Federal and Second *682 Federal. … Holding Corp. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished50 Fed. Cl. 697 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 2001
In National By-Products, Inc. v. … Hanlin v. United States, 43 Fed.Cl. 34 (1999).
Cited 3 timesPublished28 Fed. Cl. 711 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 30, 1993
Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 853 , 107 S.Ct. 188 , 93 L.Ed.2d 121 (1986); Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed.Cir.1983); Sanders v. … Plaintiff offered no evidence to support his claim, and thus failed to meet his burden to provide the court with the cogent and convincing evidence required to overcome the Board’s finding. See Cooper v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBonneville Associates v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,596 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 22, 1993
In Triton Group, Ltd. v. … Co., Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished51 Fed. Cl. 69 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2001
See Wyatt v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 314, 318 (1991); Sargisson v. United States, 913 F.2d 918, 920 (Fed.Cir.1990). … Hamon v.
Cited 24 timesPublished47 Fed. Cl. 560 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2000
Failure of the board to grant full relief where it is mandated by the records change results in [a claim].”); Bruton v. … .”); Doggett v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedUrs Energy & Construction, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 14, 2016
Prior to the entry of a final judgment by a court or a decision by an agency board, the court or agency board shall require a defective certification to be corrected.”); M. Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. … .”); Fisher v.
Cited 0 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 4, 2016
Atlanta Rapid Transit Auth. v. … R; and the Brown deed, Def.’s Ex. U.
Cited 21 timesPublishedJWK International Corp. v. United States
52 Fed. Cl. 650 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 3, 2002
V 1999). … Group, Inc. v. United States, 47 Fed.Cl. 10, 15 (2000); see also TRW, Inc. v. Unisys Corp., 98 F.3d 1325, 1327 (Fed.Cir.1996); LaBarge Prods., Inc. v. West, 46 F.3d 1547, 1555 (Fed.Cir.1995) (citing Burroughs Corp. v.
Cited 52 timesPublishedAdmiral Financial Corp. v. United States
54 Fed. Cl. 247 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 16, 2002
See Winstar Corp. v. … II, 245 F.3d at 1342 , aff'g, California Federal Bank, FSB v. United States; Landmark Land Co. v. United States; LaSalle Talman Bank, FSB v. United States; C. Robert Suess v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedMarshall Associated Contractors, Inc. v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,702 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 1, 1994
Loveladies Harbor v. … Russell Corp. v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 760, 763 (1988); D. Moody & Co. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedAAA Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States
108 Fed. Cl. 321 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2012
RCFC 12(h)(3); see also Tindle v. United States, 56 Fed.Cl. 337, 341 (2003). The United States Court of Federal Claims “is a court of limited jurisdiction.” Fullard, 78 Fed.Cl. at 299 (citing Brown v. … Pikulin v. United States, 97 Fed.Cl. 71, 75 (2011); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“Bivens actions ... lie outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims.”).
Cited 4 timesPublishedBes design/build, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 11, 2022
Co. v. United States, 5 Cl. Ct. 245, 247 (1984) (citation omitted); see also Joseph Morton Co. v. United States, 757 F.2d 1273, 1280 (Fed. … and filed its formal complaint, BES Design/Build, LLC v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 7, 2026
If a board’s decision “lacks any coherence,” it is entitled to no judicial deference. Coburn v. McHugh, 679 F.3d 924, 934 (D.C. … Boards of correction may make “a disability determination in the first instance” when a PEB is not convened. Ford v. United States, 172 Fed. Cl. 300, 311 (2024) (quoting Sawyer v.
Cited 0 timesPublished47 Fed. Cl. 503 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 8, 2000
See Crager v. United States, 25 Cl.Ct. 400, 406 (1992) (citations omitted). … See Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed.Cir.1998).
Cited 2 timesPublished33 Fed. Cl. 791 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 4, 1995
V 1993). … See Murphy v.
Cited 8 timesPublished47 Fed. Cl. 196 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 21, 2000
See Bonen v. … The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals stated in Real v. United States, 906 F.2d 1557, 1560 (Fed.Cir.1990) (citing Friedman v.
Cited 4 timesPublished49 Fed. Cl. 165 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 9, 2001
(“FY94B SERB” or “board”). … In Moore v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna