Case law

Putman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 1, 2022

Rose is a board-certified pediatric rheumatologist who had a hospital appointment at DuPont Hospital for Children until his recent retirement in June 2020. Rose Rep. at 1–2; CV, filed as Ex. B (ECF No. 20-8) at 3–4. … MacGinnitie is board-certified in allergy/immunology and pediatrics. First MacGinnitie Rep. at 1–2; CV, filed as Ex. D (ECF No. 25-15).

Anderson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 26, 2018

Anderson v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 717 Fed. App’x 1009 (Fed. Cir. 2018). At the time Ms. Chin-Caplan substituted for Mr. … Under the circumstances, a significant, across-the-board reduction would be defensible, and is within my discretion to impose. See, e.g., Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702 (2016).

Dyncorp Information Systems, LLC v. United States

58 Fed. Cl. 446 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 10, 2003

Honeywell, Inc. v. … In Nicon, Inc. v.

Cerrone v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 15, 2022

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. … Avera v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 515 F.3d 1343, 1347–48 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (quoting Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 888 (1984)).

Koehl v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 3, 2025

Moshell is a board-certified dermatologist with expertise in EBA. Pet. Ex. 8 at 2. … Maverakis is a board-certified dermatologist and a tenured professor at the University of California, Davis. Resp. Ex. A at 1.

CEMS, Inc. v. United States

59 Fed. Cl. 168 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 5, 2003

(“Because there was no ‘change’ in the contract for which the Changes clause would afford a remedy, the board did not err in declining to *197 award Mortenson the relief it sought.”). … Brown, 29 F.3d 611, 615 (Fed.Cir.1994) (“Extrinsic evidence ... should not be used to introduce an ambiguity where none exists.”).

Smith v. United States

28 Fed. Cl. 430 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 1993

Illinois v. … Yaist v.

Finkelstein v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 4, 2022

Moran * v. … Tarulli is a board-certified neurologist who personally treated petitioner for his transverse myelitis.

Joint Venture of Comint Systems Corp. v. United States

102 Fed. Cl. 235 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 2, 2011

Corp. v. … Mgmt., Inc. v.

Berryman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 26, 2021

Instead, and across the board, Plaintiff fails to establish this Court’s jurisdiction. … See, e.g., Wall v. United States, 141 Fed.

Bretag v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 27, 2017

Caimona is a paralegal at Brown, Goldstein and Levy, LLP, in Baltimore County, Maryland, and states that her billing rate is $175 per hour. Id. at 1. Ms. … See Gruber v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 91 Fed. Cl. 773, 791 (2010); Rodriguez v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 06-559V, 2009 WL 2568468, at *21 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. July 27, 2009); Carter v.

Perfect Form Manufacturing LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 20, 2022

Therefore, the Court analyzes only the additional payments related to 2012. 11 Browning Arms Co. v. United States, 56 Fed. Cl. 123, 134 (2003) (citing A.S. Epstein v. … Fitch Co. v.

National Westminster Bank, PLC v. United States

58 Fed. Cl. 491 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 14, 2003

Previously, in National Westminster Bank, PLC v. … Barseback Kraft AB v. United States, 121 F.3d 1475, 1479 (Fed.Cir.1997) (citing Olympus Corp. v. United States, 98 F.3d 1314, 1316 (Fed.Cir. 1996); Cook v. United States, 86 F.3d 1095, 1097 (Fed.Cir.1996)).

Sparks v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 4, 2021

And so, “[d]isputes concerning veterans’ benefits are handled internally by the VA” at the Board of Veterans Appeals, “with appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.” … Utley v. United States, 144 Fed. Cl. 573, 577 (2019) (citing Gable v. United States, 106 Fed. Cl. 294, 298 (2012)); Mendez-Cardenas v. United States, 88 Fed.

Science Applications International Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 7, 2025

Branch v. … In Rothman v.

Francis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 16, 2020

Oler v. … See also Turpin v. Sec'y Health & Human Servs., No. 99- 564V, 2005 WL 1026714, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v.

Geospatial Technology Associates, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 3, 2021

Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587-88 (1986) (quoting United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962)). … Co. v. United States, 62 Fed. Cl. 151, 154 (2004); Agosto v.

Powell v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 1, 2025

Axelrod is a clinical immunologist board certified in internal medicine, adult rheumatology, and allergy and immunology. Pet. Ex. 37 at 1. … Law is board certified in rheumatology and internal medicine. Resp. Ex. C at 1; Resp. Ex. D at 2. She received her M.S. from Brown University. Resp. Ex. D at 2.

Phoenix Air Group, Inc. v. United States

46 Fed. Cl. 90 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 18, 2000

(Flight), the eventual recipient of the contract, proposed to perform the contract using Phoenix as a subcontractor, and a procurement review board recommended that the award be made to Flight. … Co., Inc. v.

Oak Grove Technologies, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 2021

V. … In EFW, Inc. v.