Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.84s
114 Fed. Cl. 682 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 24, 2014
See Williams v. United States, 100 Fed. … See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.
Cited 5 timesPublished126 Fed. Cl. 638 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 2016
.”); see also Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 782 (Fed. Cir. 1988) (stating that the “court does not function as a sort of super Correction Board”); Grieg v. United States, 640 F.2d 1261, 1268 (Ct. … See also United States v. Mance, 26 M.J. 244 (C.M.A. 1988) overruled on other grounds by United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDuane Omar Burnett v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 9, 2018
Schuermann Enters., Inc. v. St. Louis County, 436 S.W.2d 666, 669 (Mo. 1969) (“[W]here the interest conveyed is limited to right of way or for right of way the estate conveyed is an easement only.”); see also Brown v. … See Brown, 152 S.W.2d at 653.
Cited 0 timesPublished33 Fed. Cl. 54 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 5, 1995
A substantially complete and fair record is a necessary requirement of proper consideration by a selection board. Sanders, 594 F.2d at 814 ; Weiss v. … The decision of the Board, therefore, is supported by substantial evidence, and cannot be further reviewed. V. Dodson Distinguished The court notes that this case is distinguishable from Dodson v.
Cited 13 timesPublished130 Fed. Cl. 88 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 22, 2016
Gurley v. Peake, 528 F.3d at 1328 ; Davis v. … Davis v.
Cited 2 timesPublished78 Fed. Cl. 738 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 10, 2007
United States v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP, No. 03-C-9355, 2004 WL 816448 , at *1 (N.D.Ill. Apr.15, 2004) (“SABW /”). … United States v. Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, LLP, No. 03-C-9355, 2004 WL 905930 , at *1 (N.D.Ill. Apr. 28, 2004) (“SABW II”).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 6, 2017
See McCulloch v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 09-293V, 2015 WL 5634323 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Sept. 1, 2015). … See Intini v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 15-304V, 2016 WL 8136089 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Dec. 21, 2016); Smith v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 16- 1282V, 2017 WL 1247866 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 6, 2025
board.” … See Jones, 30 F.4th at 1103 (holding that claim accrued at time of discharge because an appropriate board had denied claim prior to discharge); Colon v. United States, 35 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished103 Fed. Cl. 55 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 23, 2012
See Sanders v. … Fisher v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 23, 2017
DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1 Roth, Special Master: On August 20, 2013, Hazel Brown (“Ms. … Saxton v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2021
default judgment] vacated or set aside” but is instead “questioning [whether] the action taken by the Department of Justice” was justified with respect to the Department of Justice’s “representing the Railroad Retirement Board … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 3 1997); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1). Further, Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorthrop Grumman Corp. v. United States
70 Fed. Cl. 230 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 1, 2006
Morse Diesel Int’l, Inc. v. … The doctrine of collateral estoppel appears to operate between the Boards of Contract Appeals and this court. See United States v.
Cited 7 timesPublished35 Fed. Cl. 510 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 21, 1996
Plaintiff bears the heavy burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the board’s decision was arbitrary and capricious, de Cicco v. … When reasonable minds could reach differing conclusions in the same instance, the court will not substitute its own judgment for that of the military board. Maier v.
Cited 14 timesPublished100 Fed. Cl. 85 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 21, 2011
See Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Exch. … Id. at 1224-25 ; see Heisig v.
Cited 36 timesPublished97 Fed. Cl. 221 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 16, 2011
See Coltec Indus., Inc. v. … Corp. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedTaylor-Tillotson v. United States
115 Fed. Cl. 800 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 2, 2014
See Holmes v. United States,98 Fed. Cl. 767,780 (201l) (citing Chambers v. United States,4lT F.3d,1218, 1227 (Fed. Cir. 2005), ar,d Godwin v. united states,338 F.3d 1374, t378 (Fed. Cir. 2003)). … See Gossage v. United States,91 Fed. CL 10l, 106 (2010) (citing Bannum, Inc. v. United States,404 F.3d 1346 1357(Fed. Cir.2005)).
Cited 1 timesPublished94 Fed. Cl. 88 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 27, 2010
Though filing subsequent appeals to the corrections board will not usually toll a plaintiffs claim, see Van Allen v. … United States 70 Fed.Cl. 57, 63 (2006), if the “armed service itself reopens the case,” the previous board’s action is not final. Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct.Cl. 1 , 310 F.2d 381, 396 (1962); see also Bricker v.
Cited 1 timesPublished124 Fed. Cl. 374 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 15, 2015
See Bannum, Inc. v. United States, 404 F.3d 1346, 1355-57 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Santiago v. United States, 75 Fed. … See United States v.
Cited 6 timesPublished30 Fed. Cl. 207 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 3, 1993
“In military pay matters, the court reviews a plaintiffs case ‘through the prism of a correction board.’” Henson v. United States, 27 Fed.Cl. 581, 592 (1993) (quoting Cohn v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 778, 779 (1988)). … Quoting Sanders v.
Cited 17 timesPublished41 Fed. Cl. 547 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 1998
See Chevron U.S.A, Inc. v. … V.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna