Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.76s
Peterson Industrial Depot, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 29, 2018
Resorts, L.P. v. United States, 586 F.3d 962, 968–69 (2009) (citing Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 812 F.2d 1387, 1391 (Fed. Cir. 1987)). V. Discussion A. … In Caroline Hunt, the Caroline Hunt Trust Estate (“CHTE”) made an offer to the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“FHLBB”) to acquire four insolvent thrifts through a wholly owned subsidiary called Southwest Savings Association
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 28, 2016
Cir. 2013) (holding that the Due Process Clauses ofboth the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments are not money- mandating); Brown u. United States,227 Ct. … 'lf fl R ("Plaintiff . . . is not collecting one cent from the government (United States)"); V ("Plaintiff is not seeking any payment on the claim"); W ("United States will not pay out one cent of this claim"); X ("Plaintiff
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedValley Realty Co. v. United States
96 Fed. Cl. 16 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2010
(quoting Interwest Constr. v. Brown, 29 F.3d 611, 615 (Fed.Cir.1994))). “The par-ol evidence rule provides a further limitation on the use of extrinsic evidence in interpreting contracts. … Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAnchorage, a Municipal Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 21, 2020
On December 28, 2011, ICRC brought two claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. Pl. App. at 1426-1459. … RCFC 56(a); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). A material fact is one which will affect the outcome of the case. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986).
Cited 0 timesPublished44 Fed. Cl. 83 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 18, 1999
Sales Corp. v. … Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMorrison v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 8, 2025
Shah * v. … Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99- 539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedRadke v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 6, 2026
He is board-certified by the American Board of Internal Medicine in Rheumatology and has an active clinical practice. Efthimiou CV at 3; First Efthimiou Rep. at 1. Throughout his clinical career, Dr. … He is board-certified in both Internal Medicine and Rheumatology. Oddis Rep. at 1. Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPublic Housing Authorities Directors Association v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 18, 2017
See United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Grp., Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 554 (1996) (observing that Warth v. … United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839, 912 (1996) (quoting Lynch v. United States, 292 U.S. 571, 579 (1934)); see also Mobil Oil Expl. & Producing Se., Inc. v. United States, 530 U.S. 604, 607–08 (2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCaddell Construction Co. v. United States
78 Fed. Cl. 406 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 7, 2007
The White plaintiff had to literally go back to the drawing board, whereas SSC merely had gaps in the information that were easily filled in. *416 In Wunderlich v. … Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedKirby v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 28, 2020
Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … Saxton v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521-22 (Fed. Cir. 1993); see also Hines v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 22 Cl.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedKansas City Power & Light Co. v. United States
132 Fed. Cl. 28 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 26, 2017
See Marx v. … v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAsset Protection & Security Services, L.P. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 1, 2020
The Data General protestor was challenging the decision of the GSA’s Board of Contract Appeals denying its protest of GSA's award of a contract to International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). … As noted by the Federal Circuit, “[t]he principal issue is whether the Board correctly held that Data General was not entitled to relief because it did not show that it had suffered prejudice as a result of any alleged improprieties
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 23, 2018
Old GM’s board, as a consequence, acceded to every demand of the United States regarding the content of its bankruptcy filings, including the company’s request for a 363 sale and the proposed terms of the Sale Order. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIndustrial Door Contractors, Inc. v. United States
79 Fed. Cl. 413 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 2, 2007
In Wells Fargo Bank v. … Whitten, Jr., Inc. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished116 Fed. Cl. 444 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 30, 2014
had been insignificantly amended in 1968.1 After exhausting all avenues of administrative relief, including the Naval Personnel Command (“NPC”), the Office of the Navy’s Judge Advocate General (“OJAG”), and the Board … See Whitman v. Am.
Cited 6 timesPublishedChinea v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 12, 2019
He is board certified in neurology, internal medicine, electrodiagnostic medicine, and neuromuscular disorders. CV, filed as Ex. B (Docket No. 42-2} (“Donofrio CV”) at 3. 6 V. … Porter v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 663 F.3d 1242, 1249 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (citing Broekelschen v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 618 F.3d 1339, 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2010)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedInsurance Co. of the West v. United States
100 Fed. Cl. 58 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 8, 2011
See Morse v. … Instead of filing in the Court of Federal Claims, the contractor may elect to appeal the contracting officer’s decision to the appropriate agency board of contract appeals within ninety days of the contracting officer’s decision
Cited 10 timesPublishedSchneider Electric Buildings Americas, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 18, 2023
On April 23, 2020, USDA transmitted a Request for Review of Termination for Default to the Contract Review Board (“CRB”). (Pl.’s Ex. 36). … Corp. v. United States, 41 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 23, 2026
Brandt Revocable Trust v. … United States v. Va.
Cited 0 timesPublished38 Fed. Cl. 331 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 27, 1997
See Agway, Inc. v. … Windle Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna