Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
3.15s
41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,003 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 1996
Blakeslee & Sons, Inc. v. … Westerhold v. United States, 28 Fed.Cl. 172, 174 (1993). See Beauchamp Constr. Co. v.
Cited 32 timesPublishedKeith L. Keller v. the United States 0
113 Fed. Cl. 779 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 6, 2013
Plaintiff’s burden is to show by “‘cogent and clearly convincing evidence’” that the decision of the board fails this standard. Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (quoting Dorl v. … Plaintiff must also overcome the presumption of regularity which attaches to the actions of the board. See, e.g., Melendez Camilo v. United States, 642 F.3d 1040, 1045 (Fed.
Cited 8 timesPublished65 Fed. Cl. 449 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 12, 2005
The plaintiff has already presented this issue to the ASBCA in Board Case No. 54205, and to the Federal Circuit in Zoeller v. Brownlee, 113 Fed.Appx. 390 . … Brown v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 31, 41 (1983), aff'd, 741 F.2d 1374 (Fed.Cir. 1984); see also United Techs. Corp. v. Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp., 189 F.3d 1338, 1344 (Fed.Cir.1999).
Cited 7 timesPublished134 Fed. Cl. 380 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 13, 2017
See Soriano v. … First, there are certain “exceptional circumstances where the court may consider new evidence that was not before the corrections board,” Miller v. United States, 119 Fed. Cl. 717, 730 (2015) (citing Metz v.
Cited 6 timesPublished100 Fed. Cl. 656 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 7, 2011
See Henderson v. … Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d 1295, 1303 (Fed.Cir.2003).
Cited 5 timesPublished29 Fed. Cl. 107 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 13, 1993
In Blevins v. … See also Mullen v.
Cited 10 timesPublished119 Fed. Cl. 133 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 4, 2014
United States v. … IO military board is competent if it is "statutorily authorized" to hear the claim. See Real v. United States, 906 F.2d 1557, 1560 (Fed. Cir. 1990).
Cited 61 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 13, 2025
Cir. 2011) (quoting Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1983)); see also Chappell v. … Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 872 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 198 (1962)).
Cited 0 timesPublished59 Fed. Cl. 451 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 17, 2004
McMann v. … In suits under the Tucker Act and Military Pay Act, this Court’s authority to review correction board decisions is well established. Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d 1295 (2003); Sanders, 594 F.2d at 811 ; Ewing v.
Cited 16 timesPublished106 Fed. Cl. 551 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 7, 2012
(quoting Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 198 , 82 S.Ct. 691 , 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962)); Voge v. … See United States v.
Reversed on other grounds by Cameron v. United States, 550 F. App'x 867 (2013)Cited 8 timesPublished48 Fed. Cl. 602 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 13, 2001
The court included no discussion, merely referring to an earlier decision, Brown v. … Brown , in turn, relied on Loeffler v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedKeith A. Houghtling v. United States
114 Fed. Cl. 149 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 23, 2013
Defendant cites the opinion of our predecessor court in Cochran v. … The fact that a reasonable person might have reached a different conclusion is insufficient to overturn the decision of a board. Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
Cited 12 timesPublished46 Fed. Cl. 518 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 26, 2000
For example, in McCloskey v. … Similarly, in Kyer v.
Cited 11 timesPublished65 Fed. Cl. 826 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 16, 2005
In Haselrig v. … In Berkley v.
Cited 4 timesPublished60 Fed. Cl. 305 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 4, 2004
Dodson v. United States, 988 F.2d 1199, 1204-05 (Fed.Cir.1993) (internal citations omitted). When making this determination, the “court will not substitute its judgment for that of the correction board.” Harris v. … Heisig v.
Cited 17 timesPublished38 Fed. Cl. 510 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 22, 1997
See Hill v. United States, 945 F.2d 1529, 1530 (Fed. … See Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 872-74 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1019 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 (1994); Sargisson v. United States, 913 F.2d 918, 921-22 (Fed.Cir.1990); Kreis v.
Cited 10 timesPublished68 Fed. Cl. 734 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2005
Marlin v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 475, 476 (2005) (citing Brown v. … Hood Stages, Inc., *745 437 U.S. 322, 330 , 98 S.Ct. 2370 , 57 L.Ed.2d 239 (1978) (same); see also Brown v.
Cited 60 timesPublished54 Fed. Cl. 217 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2002
Co. v. … See Bowles v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJaime L. Feliciano v. United States
114 Fed. Cl. 584 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 27, 2014
In Martinez v. … Chambers v. United States, 417 F.3d 1218, 1224 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (citing Real v. United States, 906 F.2d 1556, 1560 (Fed. Cir. 1990)).
Cited 1 timesPublished60 Fed. Cl. 19 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 23, 2004
The certified opt-in class consists of all officers who were selected for involuntary retirement by the Fiscal Year 1994B Colonel Selective Early Retirement Board (“Retirement Board” or “Board”). See Christensen v. … Board of Educ. v.
Cited 12 timesPublished
Ask Donna