Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.93s
Nova group/tutor-saliba v. United States
127 Fed. Cl. 591 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 22, 2016
’l Neighbors, Inc. v. … Cir. 1988) (stating that an “untimely appeal to the board is an absolute nullity because the board lacks jurisdiction over such an appeal”); Cosmic Constr. Co. v. United States, 697 F.2d 1389, 1390 (Fed.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 19, 2018
Brown Park Estates- Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1997). … Dalles Irrigation Dist. v. United States, 71 Fed. Cl. 344, 351 (2006) (quoting Brown Park, 127 F.3d at 1457).
Cited 0 timesPublishedH.J. Heinz Co. & Subsidiaries v. United States
76 Fed. Cl. 570 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 25, 2007
Brown, “The Growing ‘Common Law1 of Taxation,” 34 S. Cal. L.Rev. 235 (1961). … See Brown v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 27, 2025
The Board reasoned that Dr. Foote’s opinion was not supported by objective evidence. Id. V. … Melendez Camilo v. United States, 642 F.3d 1040, 1044 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (quoting Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1983)); see also Chappell v.
Cited 0 timesPublished128 Fed. Cl. 203 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 8, 2016
11 board . . . .” … a disability board prior to discharge.”
Cited 35 timesPublished80 Fed. Cl. 694 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 12, 2008
Six II was decided after remand to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR or Board) following this court’s review of a prior decision of the BCNR in Six v. United States (Six I), 71 Fed.Cl. 671 (2006). … Id. at 526 (citing Lamle v. Mattel, Inc., 394 F.3d 1355 , 1359 n. 1 (Fed.Cir.2005); Abbott Labs. v. Syntron Bioresearch, Inc., 334 F.3d 1343, 1355 (Fed.Cir.2003); Corrigan v.
Cited 11 timesPublished66 Fed. Cl. 133 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 24, 2005
See, e.g., Christie v. … See Pope v. United States, 16 Cl.Ct. 637, 640 (1989). C. Review of the Correction Board Courts must afford deference to decisions of boards for the correction of military records.
Cited 14 timesPublished44 Fed. Cl. 97 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 23, 1999
See Cohn v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 778, 789 (1988) (the court reviews a military pay case “through the prism of a correction board”). … Law v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 382, 393 (1992); see also Doggett v.
Cited 14 timesPublished92 Fed. Cl. 776 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 10, 2010
Kirwin v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 497, 503 (1991) (quoting Dzialo v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 554, 561 (1984)). … This court does not serve as a “super correction board.” Van Cleave III, 70 Fed.Cl. at 678 (citing Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 322 , 594 F.2d 824, 829 (1979)).
Cited 46 timesPublished118 Fed. Cl. 420 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 11, 2014
See Bannum, Inc. v. United States, 404 F.3d 1346, 1357 (Fed. … Def.’s Cross-Mot. at 13 (citing Groves v. United States, 30 Fed.
Cited 3 timesPublished133 Fed. Cl. 607 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 18, 2017
Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1983). Finally, the plaintiff must overcome the presumption of regularity which attaches to actions of the military and military records correction boards. … Armstrong v. United States, 205 Ct.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 27, 2026
Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)). Moreover, the Court presumes that a board’s actions are valid and performed “according to the regulations and considered all of [plaintiff’s] records.” Melendez Camilo v. … See TServe Alliance, Inc. v. United States, 122 F.4th 1364, 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2024) (quoting Keene Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 372 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 7, 2016
See Bannum, Inc. v. United States, 404 F.3d 1346, 1355–57 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Santiago v. United States, 75 Fed. … Verbeck v. United States, 118 Fed. Cl. 420, 424 (2014) (citing Melendez Camilo v. United States, 642 F.3d 1040, 1045 (Fed. Cir. 2011); Helferty v. United States, 113 Fed.
Cited 8 timesPublished119 Fed. Cl. 717 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 26, 2015
Plaintiff’s burden is to show by “‘cogent and clearly convincing evidence’” that the decision of the board fails this standard. Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1986) (quoting Dorl v. … Plaintiff must also overcome the presumption of regularity which attaches to the actions of the board. See, e.g., Melendez Camilo v. United States, 642 F.3d 1040, 1045 (Fed.
Cited 21 timesPublishedHolihan v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
45 Fed. Cl. 201 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 14, 1999
Brown, 1989 WL 250117 , at *15-16. Upon review, the United States Claims Court agreed with the special master that Brown failed to prove entitlement and specifically declined to disturb this finding. Brown v. … While the Brown and Wasson cases are not binding on this court, Schwenk v.
Cited 7 timesPublished51 Fed. Cl. 818 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 13, 2002
Voge v. … See Hary v.
Cited 28 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 19, 2018
Moran * v. … See Robinson v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 15-1352V, slip op. at 2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. May 29, 2018); Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 17-0146V, slip op. at 2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished34 Fed. Cl. 755 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 7, 1996
. at 302 , 594 F.2d at 814 (citing Snell v. … See Colon v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMcClurg Family Farm, LLC v. United States
115 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 24, 2014
The court of appeals held that the interest so acquired was then transferred by deed to the board. Id. at 209 . … William & James Brown & Co. v. McGran, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 479, 493 , 10 L.Ed. 550 (1840). This principle has been routinely evoked in the context of contract law. See Levy v.
Cited 5 timesPublished44 Fed. Cl. 577 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 1999
Our review of the Correction Board’s decision is, at this posture, limited to the administrative record. Long v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 174, 176 (1987); see also, Florida Power & Light Co. v. … Long v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 174, 177 (1987).
Reversed by Stephen W. Richey v. United States, 322 F.3d 1317 (2003)Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna