Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.58s
Preferred National Insurance v. United States
54 Fed. Cl. 600 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 2, 2002
Brown of Brown Insurance Agency, Inc., the individual who had acted as plaintiffs agent when the bonds were issued. 1 The substance *602 of Mr. Brown’s response is in controversy. … Brown was qualified to act as plaintiffs agent. Mr. Brown was plaintiffs agent when the July and October bonds were issued.
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 30, 2025
See Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d 1295, 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (citing Chappell v. … (quoting SEC v.
Cited 0 timesPublished85 Fed. Cl. 820 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 23, 2009
Co. v. … See Cameron v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCitizens Federal Bank v. United States
66 Fed. Cl. 179 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2005
The engagement letter with Alex Brown is dated June 27, 1995, and the board of CSF Holdings did not have the results of Alex Brown’s analysis at its meeting of June 28,1995. … At CSF Holdings’s July 3, 1995 board meeting, Alex Brown presented its analysis of the NationsBank offer.
Cited 12 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 11, 2025
See also Orloff v. … ”); Roth v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSufi Network Services, Inc. v. United States
122 Fed. Cl. 257 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 21, 2015
The additional Board proceedings resulted from the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in SUFI Network Services, Inc. v. United States, 755 F.3d 1305 (Fed. … In 1951, the Supreme Court decided United States v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHughes Aircraft Co. v. United States
29 Fed. Cl. 197 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 1993
Brown v. … Our ease is substantially different from Cali and Brown v. Duchesne.
Cited 26 timesPublished101 Fed. Cl. 592 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 7, 2011
Sanders v. … See Bond v.
Cited 12 timesPublished63 Fed. Cl. 8 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 18, 2004
No. 04-485T; Martinez v. United States, Fed.Cl. No. 04-576T; Looney v. United States, Fed.Cl. No. 04-605T; Vories v. United States, Fed.Cl. No. 04-606T; Wallace v. United States, Fed.Cl. No. 04-793T; Brown v. … Concerned about plaintiffs attempts to engage in the unauthorized practice of law, the court therefore DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board for action.
Cited 10 timesPublished64 Fed. Cl. 547 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 23, 2005
Brown, 105 F.3d at 624 (citing Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. … (citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) and 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(1)).
Cited 4 timesPublishedNielsen-Dillingham Builders, J.V. v. United States
43 Fed. Cl. 5 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 6, 1999
Plaintiff appealed the decision to the VA Board of Contract Appeals. … Co. v. United States, 962 F.2d 998, 1003 (Fed.Cir.1992). Each part of a contract must be read together and harmonized, if at all possible. See T. Brown Constructors, Inc. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2026
The Griffin, Brown, and Chianese Property At summary judgment, the Court made two rulings relevant to the Griffin, Brown, and Chianese properties. … Neither party disputes that both instruments apply to the Griffin, Brown, and Chianese properties.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMelendez Camilo v. United States
89 Fed. Cl. 671 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 25, 2009
See Ashcroft v. … Bannum, Inc. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · May 11, 2026
When reviewing the decision of the board, the court reviews factual findings for substantial evidence. Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1157 (Fed. Cir. 1983). … Id. at 4-6 (record of board proceedings reiterating findings by the medical advisor); see Novartis AG v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., 853 F.3d 1316, 1328 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRonald J. Helferty v. United States
113 Fed. Cl. 308 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 15, 2013
See Helferty v. United States, 101 Fed. Cl. 224 (2011). During the Board’s reconsideration of Mr. … In Williams v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMorris Shelkofsky v. United States
110 Fed. Cl. 15 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 20, 2013
Shelkofsky presented his claim first to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, so judicial review is limited to the Board’s resolution of the claim. Metz v. United States, 466 F.3d 991, 999 (Fed. … Walls v. United States, 582 F.3d 1358, 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
Cited 3 timesPublished111 Fed. Cl. 459 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 26, 2013
See Cede & Co. v. … Ch. 2007); see also Burks v.
Cited 3 timesPublished39 Fed. Cl. 81 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 22, 1997
Id. at 257 , 54 S.Ct. at 709 ; see also Board of County Supervisors v. United States, 116 F.3d 454, 457 (Fed.Cir.1997) (valuation in eminent domain). … Monroe County Planning Commission Zoning Board, Resolution 18 (Nov. 9, 1989). .
Cited 18 timesPublished81 Fed. Cl. 188 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 27, 2008
Domenico Garufi v. United States, 238 F.3d 1324, 1338 (Fed.Cir.2001))). Thus, “[t]he burden of overturning a military board decision is a heavy one.” French v. … See Flute v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedSufi Network Services, Inc. v. United States
128 Fed. Cl. 683 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 19, 2016
CMTA-IAM Pension Trust, 746 F.2d 587, 591 (9th Cir. 1984) (fee recovery under ERISA); Smith v. Detroit Board of Education, 728 F.2d 359, 360 (6th Cir. 1984) (fee recovery under 42 U.S.C. § 1988); Lavender v. … See e.g., Maritime Management, Inc. v. United States, 242 F.3d 1326, 1333 (11th Cir. 2001); Mendenhall v. National Transportation Safety Board, 92 F.3d 871, 875-77 (9th Cir. 1996); American Hospital Assoc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna