Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.70s
122 Fed. Cl. 803 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2015
. § 1558(f); Reduction in v. … Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006) (citing United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 630 (2002)).
Cited 5 timesPublished126 Fed. Cl. 251 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 29, 2016
Brown's declaration, Mr. Chittenden and Mr. Hall "did not raise any concems at that time." Id. Both Mr. Chittenden and Mr. Hall, however, contest Mr. Brown's characterization and claim that Mr. … Inc. v. U.S.
Cited 3 timesPublished77 Fed. Cl. 114 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 11, 2007
See Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed.Cir.1998) (citing Skinner v. … See, e.g., Corrigan v.
Cited 43 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 51 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 9, 2016
.”); Hernandez v. United States, 38 Fed. Cl. 532, 536–37 (1997); Brezler v. Mills, 86 F. … Whether or not this was an adequate request for a special board, see Crumley v. United States, 122 Fed.
Cited 7 timesPublished117 Fed. Cl. 560 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2014
v. … Although a review board is not required to discuss every medical record in evidence, Rebosky v. United States, 60 Fed.
Cited 10 timesPublished59 Fed. Cl. 675 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 20, 2004
Under a litigated judgment, plaintiffs who were successful at the Selection Board could seek reinstatement to active duty. Palmer v. United States, 168 F.3d at 1314 . But under cases such as Gilligan v. … See Isby v.
Cited 27 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 345 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 23, 2016
Alford had not raised it in his petitions to either the Discharge Board or Navy Correction Board, which is a jurisdictional prerequisite to presentation of such a claim in this court. Id. (citing Chambers v. … See Walls v. United States, 582 F.3d 1358, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (citing Florida Power & Light Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished131 Fed. Cl. 350 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 2017
See Foster v. Mabus, 103 F. … Bias has failed to demonstrate that the Board erred in reaching that conclusion. In fact, another decision relied upon by Mr. Bias provides supp01t for the Board's decision. See Hamrick v. United States, 96 F.
Cited 6 timesPublished99 Fed. Cl. 772 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 1, 2011
See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“Because fraud as a cause of action lies in tort, the [United States Court of Federal Claims] concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction[.]”). … The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, howev *782 er, has held that a separate claim does not accrue when an administrative board denies relief. See Hurick v.
Cited 5 timesPublished80 Fed. Cl. 806 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 18, 2008
Therefore, an FAA employee “may submit an appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board and may seek judicial review of any resulting final orders or decisions of the Board from any action that was ap-pealable to the Board … See 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(1); Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Alves v. United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v.
Cited 9 timesPublished124 Fed. Cl. 134 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 30, 2015
United States v. Testan,424U.5.392,398 (1976). … Sand & Gravel Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 44 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 3, 2016
Moehl v. United States, 34 Fed. Cl. 682, 690 (1996). Thus, a secretary’s decision may “differ with a board’s recommendations where the evidence is susceptible of varying interpretations.” Id. at 690 (citing Sanders v. … Nevertheless, a secretary may not “arbitrarily refuse to follow the fact findings of the correction board where all the evidence supports the board’s findings.” Moehl, 34 Fed. Cl. at 690 (citing Hertzog v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedKansas Gas and Electric Company v. United States
111 Fed. Cl. 169 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 20, 2013
In United States v. Brown, the Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court‟s extension of time for filing a late notice of appeal where a criminal defendant‟s counsel had missed the deadline by one day. United States v. … Brown, 133 F.3d 993 (7th Cir. 1998).
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 12, 2018
, Petitioner, v. … See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBrown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 6, 2018
BROWN, Petitioner, v. … Rochester v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCitizens Federal Bank v. United States
66 Fed. Cl. 179 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2005
The engagement letter with Alex Brown is dated June 27, 1995, and the board of CSF Holdings did not have the results of Alex Brown’s analysis at its meeting of June 28,1995. … At CSF Holdings’s July 3, 1995 board meeting, Alex Brown presented its analysis of the NationsBank offer.
Cited 12 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 734 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 24, 2016
the Board. … .”); see also Shockley v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 3, 2026
Baude v. United States, 955 F.3d 1290 (Fed. Cir. 2020). On remand, Lt Col Engle was selected for continuation by a special board. … On March 15, 2017, the Board denied Lt Col Engle special board consideration. Id. at 2-6; AR 403-07. The Court subsequently upheld the AFBCMR’s denial of special board consideration. Baude v. United States, 137 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 12, 2025
Porter v. United States, 163 F.3d 1304, 1312 (Fed. Cir. 1998). The court owes “substantial deference” to the corrections board; it “does not sit as a ‘super correction board.’” Chapman v. … As an initial matter, a party who makes an argument before the board cannot later complain that the board erred if it adopts or agrees with that argument. Key Pharmaceuticals v.
Cited 0 timesPublished85 Fed. Cl. 820 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 23, 2009
Co. v. … See Cameron v.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna