Case law

Anderson v. United States

47 Fed. Cl. 438 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 22, 2000

Suess v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 89, 94 (1995). … Bank v. United States, 39 Fed.Cl. 753 (1997), and its prior decisions in Castle v. United States, 42 Fed.Cl. 859 (1999), Glass v.

Johnson Controls World Services, Inc. v. United States

48 Fed. Cl. 479 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 26, 2001

See Textron Defense Sys. v. Widnall, 143 F.3d 1465, 1468 (Fed.Cir.1998); Aleman Food Servs., Inc. v. United States, 994 F.2d 819, 822 (Fed.Cir.1993). … Greco v. Dep’t of Army, 852 F.2d 558, 560 (Fed.Cir.1988) (same).

Barksdale v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2024

United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 (1941) (“[I]f the relief sought is against others than the United States the suit as to them must be ignored as beyond the jurisdiction of the court.”); Brown v. … See Brown, 105 F.3d at 624. Indeed, in another case, a different judge on the Court of Federal Claims construed claims against “the federal judiciary” as claims against “individual federal judicial officers.” Portnov v.

O'Connor v. United States

50 Fed. Cl. 285 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 24, 2001

Massachusetts v. Morash, 490 U.S. 107, 115 , 109 S.Ct. 1668 , 104 L.Ed.2d 98 (1989); Kelly v. Robinson, 479 U.S. 36, 44 , 107 S.Ct. 353 , 93 L.Ed.2d 216 (1986); United States v. … Congress provided only two across-the-board exceptions to the supremacy of grievance procedures.

R.R. Donnelley & Sons, Co. v. United States

42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,249 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 30, 1998

Keco Indus., Inc. v. … In Keco Indus., Inc. v.

Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United States

79 Fed. Cl. 135 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 2007

To prevail, the moving party must meet the “exacting standard of identifying ‘a manifest error of law or mistake of fact.’ ” Browning Ferris Indus., Inc. v. United States, 2007 WL 1412087 , at *1 (Fed.Cl. … Browning Ferris Indus., 2007 WL 1412087 , at *1. See also Four Rivers Inv., Inc. v. United States, 78 Fed.Cl. 662, 664-65 (2007); Shirlington Limousine & Transp., Inc. v. United States, 78 Fed.Cl. 27, 29 (2007). B.

Spodek v. United States

73 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 8, 2006

The plaintiffs, appearing pro se, challenged this action by the USPS at the Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals. The Board upheld the USPS’s finding, but awarded the USPS only $22,047.52. See Appeal of J. … Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. Danzig, 224 F.3d 1283, 1292 (Fed.Cir.2000) (quoting Coath & Goss, Inc. v. United States, 101 Ct.Cl. at 714-15); T. Brown Constructors, Inc. v.

Shalhoub v. United States

75 Fed. Cl. 584 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 1, 2007

See Haines v. … (citations omitted); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (1997); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Nat’l City Bank v.

Devon Energy Corp. v. United States

45 Fed. Cl. 519 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 21, 1999

Hopi Tribe v. … Corp. v.

Evans v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services

30 Fed. Cl. 709 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 28, 1994

Once he elects or chooses to go to board, he is foreclosed from thereafter rejecting that election so that he might sue directly in court. … See Amendola v. Secretary of DHHS, 989 F.2d 1180, 1184-84 (Fed.Cir.1993); see also Hamilton v. Secretary of DHHS, 28 Fed.Cl. 315 (1993); Matos v. Secretary of DHHS, 25 Cl.Ct. 703 (1992).

Barclay v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 18, 2015

Raymond is board-certified in clinical genetics, as well as neurology with a special qualification in child neurology. Tr. 223. According to Dr. … Corp. v. United States, 743 F.3d 837, 844 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (oil and gas leases); Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1371 (Fed.

Parkwood Associates Ltd. Partnership v. United States

97 Fed. Cl. 809 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 8, 2011

Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1456 (Fed.Cir.1997); see also Ariadne Fin. Servs. Pty. Ltd. v. United States, 133 F.3d at 879; Petro-Hunt, L.L.C., 90 Fed.Cl. at 64 n. 12. … See, e.g., Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev.

Kawa v. United States

77 Fed. Cl. 294 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 28, 2007

Judge Plager stated, in sum, that where “a nonfrivolous claim for relief has been asserted before the Board, and the outcome is determined by whether the facts support that claim, a decision by the Board that they do not … is a failure to prove the claim, not a lack of jurisdiction in the Board.”

Data Monitor Systems, Inc. v. United States

74 Fed. Cl. 66 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2006

LLC v. … Board’s actual decision.

Modeer v. United States

68 Fed. Cl. 131 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 26, 2005

Co. v. … Prior to the entry of a final *139 judgment by a court or a decision by an agency board of contract appeals, the court or agency board shall require a defective certification to be corrected.”); Medina, 43 Fed.Cl. at 548

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation v. United States

122 Fed. Cl. 711 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2015

Cl. 210; Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 313 (2013) (“Sikorsky V”). … The contractor appealed the denial of nine of those claims to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. Id.

The Dana R. Hodges Trust v. United States

111 Fed. Cl. 452 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 21, 2013

Hodges Trust v. United States, 101 Fed. Cl. 549, 550 (2011); see also Thompson v. United States, 101 Fed. … In Illig v. United States, 58 Fed.

Fifth Third Bank v. United States

52 Fed. Cl. 264 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 12, 2002

E.g., Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. … Anderson v.

Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United States

45 Fed. Cl. 404 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 22, 1999

See 41 U.S.C. § 602 (a); Mendenhall v. Kusicko, 857 F.2d 1378, 1379 (9th Cir.1988) (per curiam); Spectrum v. United States, 764 F.2d 891 , 893 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.1985). … Other background can be found at Manke Lumber Co. v. United States, 45 Fed.Cl. 157 (1999); Seaboard Lumber (Penn Timber) v. United States, 44 Fed.Cl. 215 (1999); Manke Lumber (Mount Adams) v.

Holmes v. United States

92 Fed. Cl. 311 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 15, 2010

v. … Peanut Farmers v. United States, 409 F.3d 1370, 1374-75 (Fed.Cir.2005) ("[A]bsent transfer, applicable statutes of limitations may bar [plaintiffs] from adjudicating otherwise legitimate claims.”); see also Brown v.