Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

1.97s

  • 27-35 Jackson Ave LLC v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 12, 2022

    See Brown v. United States, Case No. 13-79, 1981 U.S. Ct. Cl. … Brown, at *7; see also Richardson v. United States, 17 Cl.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brumley v. United States

    55 Fed. Cl. 431 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 6, 2003

    The Board noted that the case had been “dormant with respect to forfeiture and overpayment issues” because of the lawsuits and appeals that plaintiff had filed. The Board reduced the amount that Mr. … Lewis v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Thune v. United States

    41 Fed. Cl. 49 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 5, 1998

    Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir. 1997). … Brown, 105 F.3d at 623 . *52 Two factors relevant here serve to distinguish takings from torts. First, “takings result only from authorized acts of government officials.” Earnest v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States

    72 Fed. Cl. 712 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 22, 2006

    Beginning in September 1981, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board of New York identified Suburbia as a “problem institution.” Plaintiffs Appendix (“Pltfs App.”) at 22. … Bank, FSB v. United States, 60 Fed.Cl. 80 (2004); Globe Sav. Bank, FSB v. United States, 59 Fed.Cl. 86 (2003); Franklin Fed. Sav. Bank v. United States, 55 Fed.Cl. 108 (2003); Columbia First Bank, FSB v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Aclr, LLC v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 15, 2021

    Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. Wynne, 497 F.3d 1350, 1356 (Fed. … Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 828 F.2d 759, 767 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (quoting Willems Indus., Inc. v. United States, 295 F.2d 811, 831 (Ct. Cl. 1961)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Retirement Communities LLC v. United States

    92 Fed. Cl. 587 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 19, 2010

    Sorrell, Sorrell Deck ¶ 10; and as a “deferral” in the ECUA Board Report, ECUA Board Report 1. … See ECUA Board Report 1-2; Compl. ¶ 13.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Young v. United States

    92 Fed. Cl. 425 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 22, 2010

    Bank, F.S.B. v. … ."); Stoll v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Coastal International Security, Inc. v. United States

    93 Fed. Cl. 502 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 14, 2010

    Inc. v. … Bank, FSB v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • American Heritage Bancorp v. United States

    56 Fed. Cl. 596 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 4, 2003

    Jana, Inc. v. United States, 34 Fed.Cl. 447, 449 (1995). Conley v. … Paul was not just an officer ‘clothed with the authority to act;’ he, as CEO, Chairman of the Board and majority shareholder, in effect, controlled [the corporation.]”) O’Brien Gear & Machine Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • BEVIRT v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 24, 2025

    See McCotter v. … Plaintiffs alternatively attempt to analogize instead to Brown v. United States, where this court held that easements conveyed were for railroad purposes. ECF 24 at 32; 153 Fed. Cl. 318 (2021).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Local America Bank v. United States

    52 Fed. Cl. 184 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 27, 2002

    Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 123, 140 (1992) (quoting Air Terminal Servs., Inc. v. … Prods., Inc. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jordan v. United States

    128 Fed. Cl. 46 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 2016

    v. United States, 143 Ct. … Cl. at 805; ' " ' " Brown 105 F.3d at 623.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brisbin v. United States

    119 Fed. Cl. 701 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 13, 2015

    See Doc. l0 at2 ("ft was known, or should have been known to both parties that a Board Of Contract Appeals, or a Federal Court would refrain from making a decision on any one of these issues regarding Payment until the Board … See Hays v. Postmaster General, 868 F.2d 328,331 (9th Cir. 1989).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ahlum v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 11, 2018

    Brown, which is undated. Ex. G. Dr. Brown states that “sepsis” refers only to a condition that bacterial infections cause. Id. at 1. Dr. Brown denies that MMR vaccine caused T.A.’s encephalopathy. Id. … Brown regarding a Table encephalopathy.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rhinocorps Ltd. v. United States

    85 Fed. Cl. 712 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 28, 2009

    Wiltel, Inc., and MCI Telecommunications protested the modification as exceeding the scope of AT & T’s original contract to the General Services Administrative Board of Contract Appeals (the “Board”), and the Board granted … AT & T and the GSA appealed the Board’s decision.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Abramson v. United States

    42 Fed. Cl. 326 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 18, 1998

    See Romero, 38 F.3d at 1209-12 (finding withholding of pay sufficient to fall within context of personnel actions, such that plaintiffs entitled to recover pursuant to Back Pay Act); Brown v. … Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. United States

    37 Fed. Cl. 28 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 22, 1996

    Approximately seven miles below Lock E, Mackeys Creek converges with the confluence of the Little Brown and Big Brown Creeks to form the East Fork of the Tombigbee River (the “East Fork”). … Howard Indus., Inc. v. United States, 126 Ct.Cl. 283, 289-90 , 115 F.Supp. 481, 484-85 (1953); Cities Serv. Pipe Line Co. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Savin v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

    85 Fed. Cl. 313 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 24, 2008

    Mar. 30, 2006) (excess hours, rates, and duplication of efforts); Britton v. Sec'y of HHS, No. 02-0094V, 2005 WL 6115366 (Fed.Cl.Spec.Mstr. July 11, 2005) (excess hours charged); Brown v. … .”); Brown v.

    Cited 2,358 timesPublished
  • Salem Financial, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 20, 2013

    Sidley Austin Brown & Wood Sidley & Austin LLP was an international law firm that merged with Brown & Wood in 2001 to become Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP. Chapman Tr. 2976, 3177. … Reed gave a presentation to BB&T Corporation’s Board of Directors, in which he informed the Board of the potential STARS transaction. JX 245; PX 29. Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United States

    97 Fed. Cl. 324 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 7, 2011

    Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 846 F.2d 746, 748 (Fed.Cir.1988) (citing Zunamon v. Brown, 418 F.2d 883, 886 (8th Cir.1969)). … (quoting Brown v. Young, 69 Iowa 625 , 29 N.W. 941, 941 (Iowa 1886)). Iowa law does not govern this case. Plaintiffs also point to dicta in two cases, Davis v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.