Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
3.88s
Rust Constructors Inc. v. United States
49 Fed. Cl. 490 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 31, 2001
On June 29, 2000, Rust filed an appeal with the United States Army Forces Command Administrative Appeals Board (FORSCOM AAB). … See, e.g., United States Lines, Inc. v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedOasis International Waters, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 1, 2017
Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d at 1366 (quoting Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 99 Fed. … Co. v. United States, 557 F.3d at 1341; Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished88 Fed. Cl. 776 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 2, 2009
The Board dismissed Mr. Filipczyk’s claim on June 17, 2008 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the CBA did not permit appeal to the Board to resolve grievances. Id. Mr. … Filipczyk petitioned the Board for reconsideration on July 14, 2008. Id. On August 27, 2008, the Board granted Mr.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHinton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 5, 2023
Centmehaiey v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 32 Fed. Cl. 612, 621, aff’d, 73 F.3d 381 (Table) (Fed. Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (citing Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 18 Cl. … Brown, 18 Cl. Ct. at 840 (finding the entry “Conway to Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTurner Construction Co., Inc. v. United States
94 Fed. Cl. 561 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 2010
July 2009 Technical Review Board, Meeting On July 20, 2009, [* * *] arrived in Savannah to attend sessions of the Technical Review Board. … Co., LLC v.
Cited 37 timesPublishedLang v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 5, 2021
She is board certified by the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery. (Id.) Dr. … Dobrydnev v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 566 Fed. Appx. 976, 982-83 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (citing Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993)). In contrast to Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublished2m Research Services, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 6, 2018
Nathanael Brown Yale, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for defendant. Patrick Trent Rothwell, PilieroMazza PLLC, Washington, DC, for defendant-intervenor. … Performance factor; (2) review compliance with FAR 52.219-14; (3) decide whether to award with or without discussions and conduct price evaluation as necessary; and (4) issue a new technical source selection evaluation board
Cited 0 timesPublished94 Fed. Cl. 456 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2010
United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir. 1998); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (Fed.Cir.1997); Golden Pacific Bancorp v. … More recently, in reference to this court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Brown v.
Cited 7 timesPublished53 Fed. Cl. 737 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 30, 2002
Brown, which the Nasem court found inadequate to show that the agency had acted in a judicial capacity. 595 F.2d at 807 . … Systems Board Reporter (M.S.P.R.). .
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 21, 2018
. § * 2412(d); Attorney’s Fees; Prevailing v. … Silva petitioned the Naval Discharge Review Board (“NDRB”) for his discharge, alleging, among other things, that the denial of a hearing under the administrative board was improper conduct. Id. at ¶ 38.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStrategic Business Solutions, Inc v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 3, 2017
Brown, The Brown Firm PLLC, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff. Devin A. Wolak, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, with whom were Douglas K. … The contracting officer (CO) then convened a source selection evaluation board (SSEB) and provided its members with the redacted volumes received from each offeror. See id.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEstate of Braude v. United States
35 Fed. Cl. 99 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 7, 1996
V. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2707 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Cafeteria and Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedManke Lumber Co. v. United States
45 Fed. Cl. 157 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 29, 1999
See Yerxa v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 110 (1986), aff'd, 824 F.2d 978 (1987); see also Kelly v. United States, 10 Cl.Ct. 579 (1986), aff'd, 826 F.2d 1049 . … See Heinemann v. United States, 796 F.2d 451, 456 (Fed.Cir.1986); Aerolease Long Beach v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 342, 354, 355 (1994). .
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 13, 2020
by the Board. … Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449, 1454 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (quoting Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. United States, 855 F.2d 1573, 1576-77 (Fed. Cir. 1988)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLooks Great Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 17, 2019
. § 1491(a)(1); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997). … Cl. at 364; Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 117 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDetroit Housing Corp. v. United States
55 Fed. Cl. 410 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 27, 2003
Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 599 , 372 F.2d 1002, 1010 (1967); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997). … T Brown Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 132 F.3d 724, 729 (Fed.Cir.1998). An “intent to mislead is not an essential element of actionable misrepresentation in the breach of contract context.” Womack v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedAmerican Express Co. v. United States
47 Fed. Cl. 127 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2000
In Hewlett-Packard Co. v. United States, 71 F.3d 398 (Fed.Cir.1995), rev’g Apollo Computer, Inc. v. … The Board noted that such arrangements provide opportunities to lend and concluded that the related fees represent commitment fees.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · May 17, 2023
This court will disturb the decision of a military board only if it is “arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence.” Barnick v. United States, 591 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2010). … Ford v. United States, 150 Fed. Cl. 220, 224 (2020). A board’s decision will likewise be upheld if it reflects a “rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.” See Burlington Truck Lines Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDavis v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 24, 2022
Notably while board certified in neurology, Dr. … In his 2017 report, he referred to four board-certified neurologists who diagnosed petitioner with CIDP: Drs. Mahmood, Seminer, Hu, and Knox. At hearing, he added Dr. Brown. Tr. 280; Pet. Ex. 55. He then added Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublished42 Fed. Cl. 373 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 24, 1998
See Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 978 F.2d 679, 686-89 (Fed.Cir.1992). … (quoting Board of Trustees of District No. 15 Machinists' Pension Fund v. Kahle Engineering Corp., 43 F.3d 852, 857 (C.A.3 1994)).
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna