Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

1.16s

  • L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. United States

    91 Fed. Cl. 347 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 16, 2010

    So too, in Four Points by Sheraton v. … S.B. v. United States, 61 Fed.Cl. 91, 96-97 (2004) (quoting Aliotta v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 315 F.3d 756, 761 (7th Cir.2003)); see also Yankee Atomic Elec. Co. v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Madsen v. United States

    48 Fed. Cl. 464 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 29, 2000

    Franks v. … V.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Crowley v. United States

    53 Fed. Cl. 737 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 30, 2002

    Brown, which the Nasem court found inadequate to show that the agency had acted in a judicial capacity. 595 F.2d at 807 . … Systems Board Reporter (M.S.P.R.). .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ghaffari v. United States

    125 Fed. Cl. 665 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 22, 2016

    See Bush v. United States, 627 F. App’x 928, 930 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (citing Treece v. United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 226, 232 (2010)). See also Conner v. United States, Case No. 1:15-cv-5107, 2016 WL 125289, at *2 (Fed. Cir. … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997). On this basis, plaintiff’s Bivens claims alleged against any individual for violating his constitutional rights are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Anita Roberts and Gary Roberts, Co-Petitioners, as Next Friends, Parents Acting on Behalf of Amber D. Roberts Their Minor Child v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 29, 2013

    Althen v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 418 F.3d 1274, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 2005). A petitioner must satisfy the three Althen prongs by preponderant evidence. Capizzano v. … Brown also reiterated that which Petitioners’ other experts, Dr. Krousgrill and Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Capelouto v. United States

    99 Fed. Cl. 682 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 17, 2011

    United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993) (noting that “tort cases *689 are outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims”); Brown v. … See Brown, 105 F.3d at 623 (“Because monetary damages are not available for a Fourth Amendment violation, the Court of Federal Claims does not have jurisdiction over such a violation.”); Stephanatos v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Annette E. Jones Norman Sampsonwayne Randolf Scott, Roland Simmons Hazella Thornhill, Sidney Wallace, Anthony Williams, Michael Yahko, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 2, 2013

    See Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 Fed. Cir. 1997); see also Worthington v. United States, 53 Fed. Appx. 77, 81-82 (Fed. Cir. 2002). … Brown, 106 F.3d 1577, 1579 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (defining the phrase “administrative determination of entitlement” as used in 38 U.S.C. § 5110(g)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Martinez v. United States

    94 Fed. Cl. 176 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 12, 2010

    Bowey v. West, 218 F.3d 1373, 1377 (Fed.Cir.2000); see also Pierce v. … See Libas, Ltd. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Wells Fargo & Company v. United States

    119 Fed. Cl. 27 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 20, 2014

    Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167, 172 (2001). … John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v.

    Reversed in part by Wells Fargo & Company v. United States, 827 F.3d 1026 (2016)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Demarco Durzo Development Co. v. United States

    73 Fed. Cl. 731 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2006

    For example, in Munson v. … See Anderson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kozel v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 2, 2018

    Mielke is board-certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. She practices “integrative psychiatry,” and treated Mr. Kozel for several years. Exhibit 13 (Dr. Mielke letter). … Although the Secretary may legitimately distinguish a board-certified neurologist from a board-certified psychiatrist, the Secretary did not present any argument explaining why a board-certified psychiatrist is not qualified

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Planate Management Group, LLC v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 27, 2018

    Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 168, 171 (2014); accord 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(2) (providing jurisdiction in the Court of Federal Claims to hear disputes arising under the CDA). … See Kellogg Brown, 115 Fed. Cl. at 183 (“[T]he law is clear that ‘the same claim must be presented to the Court of Federal Claims as was decided by the contracting officer.’” (quoting Ace Constructors, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hirmiz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 17, 2014

    He is certified by the Specialty Board of the American Board of Pediatrics, Sub-Specialty Board of the American Board of Allergy/ Immunology, the Sub-Specialty Board of the American Board of Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious … McGeady is certified by the American Board of Pediatrics, the American Board of Allergy and Immunology, and the Board of Diagnostic and Laboratory Immunology. (Ex. B, p. 11; 3-Tr. 74.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williamson v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 10, 2017

    Jacqueline Camille Brown, United States Department of Justice, Environmental and Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government. … Hallward-Driemeier of Ropes & Gray LLP expressed his intent to act as Of Counsel on behalf of Plaintiffs in Aldred, et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schweitzer v. United States

    82 Fed. Cl. 592 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 18, 2008

    Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (citing Bivens, 403 U.S. at 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 ; 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)). … “Thus, the Bivens actions asserted by [the plaintiffs] lie outside the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims.” 5 Brown, 105 F.3d at 624 .

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Brookins v. Untied States

    75 Fed. Cl. 133 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 30, 2007

    The Board has essentially agreed with this position in similar cases. … The Board has essentially agreed with this position in similar cases.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Crosby v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2019

    Brown. pbrown@brownlawidaho.com, | gave them to him at Gooding Courthouse, Mr Browns work address 130 4! … Cir. 1998); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. United States

    101 Fed. Cl. 287 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2011

    See Preseault v. … In Loveland v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • United International Investigative Services, Inc. v. United States

    42 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,336 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 7, 1998

    Each member of the board will evaluate each proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria designated in this solicitation.... … Maintenance, Inc. v.

    Cited 80 timesPublished
  • Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 1, 2017

    Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d at 1366 (quoting Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 99 Fed. … Co. v. United States, 557 F.3d at 1341; Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.