Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.93s
Boston Edison Co. v. United States
80 Fed. Cl. 468 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 15, 2008
Corp. v. … Bank v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedRCS Enterprises v. United States
53 Fed. Cl. 303 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 22, 2002
Derrick Electric Co. v. … Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished34 Fed. Cl. 159 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 10, 1995
The results of this examination were reported to the MEB, which then recommended that plaintiff be referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (the “PEB”) for further action. … Stephens v. United States, 174 Ct.Cl. 365, 372 , 358 F.2d 951, 954 (1966). “Judicial deference to administrative decisions of fitness for duty of service members is and of right should be the norm.” Maier v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedParadigm Learning, Inc. v. United States
93 Fed. Cl. 465 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 14, 2010
Corp. v. … Co. v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedFirst Federal Lincoln Bank v. United States
68 Fed. Cl. 200 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 20, 2005
First Federal Lincoln Bank v. … Bank, F.S.B. v. United States, 245 F.3d 1342 (Fed.Cir.2001), D & N Bank v. United States, 331 F.3d 1374 (Fed.Cir.2003), Anderson v. United States, 344 F.3d 1343 (Fed.Cir.2003), First Commerce Corp. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished37 Fed. Cl. 677 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 11, 1997
In support of this contention, plaintiffs rely on Brown v. Hitchcock, 173 U.S. 473, 476 , 19 S.Ct. 485, 486 , 43 L.Ed. 772 (1899). Brown involved a transfer of lands under the swamp-land act. … Brown v. United States, 86 F.3d 1554, 1559 (Fed.Cir.1996) (quoting United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 400 , 96 S.Ct. 948, 954 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976) (inter *688 nal quotations and citation omitted)).
Cited 0 timesPublished44 Fed. Cl. 737 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 15, 1999
In McClure Electrical Constructors, Inc. v. … Hercules Inc. v. United States, 24 F.3d 188, 196 (1994); American Ship Building Company v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 220 , 654 F.2d 75 (1981); and Western Empire Constructors, Inc. v.
Reversed on other grounds by James Giesler and Luke Coniglio (Doing Business as Central Park Company) v. United States, Defendant-Cross, 232 F.3d 864 (2000)Cited 3 timesPublished70 Fed. Cl. 479 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 28, 2006
Flexfab, LLC v. … The Board’s statement implies cowardice, which slanders and defames my person and character.
Cited 5 timesPublished77 Fed. Cl. 92 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 31, 2007
(citations omitted); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g *96 denied (1997); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Nat'l City Bank v. … United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Alves v. United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDillenbeck v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 6, 2020
ECF No. 51 at 12 (citing Brown v. Sec’y of Health & 8 Special Master explain why lost wages up until the particular date of July 29, 2019, were warranted. … The decision in Brown v. Sec'y of Dep't of Health & Human Servs., No. 00-0182V, 2005 WL 2659073 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.
Cited 0 timesPublished233rd Street Partnership, L.P. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 7, 2025
Schulenburg v. United States, 137 Fed. Cl. 79, 87 (2018) (“To establish a taking, Plaintiffs must establish their ownership interest in the private property allegedly taken.” (citing Cienega Gardens v. … On April 11, 2023, C.S.X. did so, prompting the City of New York to petition the United States Surface Transportation Board for interim trail use. Id. at 4–5.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFirst Annapolis Bancorp, Inc. v. United States
75 Fed. Cl. 280 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2007
In contrast, in Admiral Financial Corp. v. … Equipment Corp. v.
Cited 11 timesPublished130 Fed. Cl. 554 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 8, 2017
Murphy filed an appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board ("the Board"). Compl. Tab 3, at 1 1. On July 10, 2015, the appeal was dismissed because the Board determined that it lacked jurisdiction over his appeal. … See Pauley v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States
105 Fed. Cl. 657 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 18, 2012
Corp. v. … Among other things, the provisions of the CDA providing jurisdictional access to boards of contract appeals and to this court cannot be waived. See Minesen Co. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedGeneral Motors Corporation v. United States
112 Fed. Cl. 608 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 10, 2013
Brown, McLean, VA, of counsel. OPINION FIRESTONE, Judge. … In making legal interpretations of the provisions and requirements of the CAS, the court looks to any guidance the CAS Board (“CASB”) has published. See Perry v. Martin Marietta Corp., 47 F.3d 1134, 1137 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTDM America, LLC v. United States
100 Fed. Cl. 485 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 2011
United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 278, 281 (1985), affd, 779 F.2d 656 (Fed.Cir.1985) (citing Brown v. Pa. RR. Co., 282 F.2d 522, 526 (3d Cir.1960)). … See Atlantic Thermoplastics Co. v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 8, 2023
See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623–24 (Fed Cir. 1997) (Fourth Amendment); Black v. United States, 28 Fed. Cl. 177, 186 (1993), aff’d, 16 F.3d 421 (Fed. … Cir. 2008); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997); see Straw v. United States, 4 F.4th 1358, 1361 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 18, 2022
Accordingly, “Board decisions . . . can be set aside if they are arbitrary, capricious, or not based on substantial evidence.” Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 (1983) (citations omitted). … The burden is on the plaintiff to show “by ‘cogent and clearly convincing evidence’ that the decision of the military correction board fails this [substantial evidence] standard.” Watson v. United States, 113 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished89 Fed. Cl. 102 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2009
United States v. … Back Pay Act — even though in the continued particular case the employee could not assert the claim before the Board.”
Cited 6 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 10, 2021
Moreover, the ABCMR did not find any basis for Plaintiff’s claim that his medical records should have been reviewed by the Medical Evaluation Board (“MEB”) or referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (“PEB”). Id. … Butler v. Principi, 244 F.3d 1337, 1340 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna