Case law

Marcinkowsky v. United States

44 Fed. Cl. 610 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 17, 1999

v. … See 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a); Keene Corp. v. United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Brown, 105 F.3d at 623 (Fed.Cir.1997) (allegations of fraud in tax assessment sound in tort).

City of Tacoma v. United States

38 Fed. Cl. 582 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 24, 1997

Utilities v. United States, 31 F.3d 1130 (Fed.Cir.1994). … In Consumers Ice Co. v.

Logicvision, Inc. v. United States

54 Fed. Cl. 549 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 2002

E.g., Kasler/Continental Heller/Fruin Colnon v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 187, 189 (1985); Alpine v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 802 (1990). … While this court is not bound by the Boards of Contract Appeals’ decisions, it recognizes their expertise in cases involving government contracts. See Erickson Air Crane Co. v.

Vander Zyl v. United States

28 Fed. Cl. 85 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 7, 1993

United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 400 , 96 S.Ct. 948, 954 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976); United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 3 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969). … “Once a plaintiff has sought relief from the [Board for Correction of Military Records], such plaintiff is bound by that board’s determination unless he can meet the difficult standard of proof that the Correction Board’s

Ilaw v. United States

121 Fed. Cl. 408 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 4, 2015

United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Rick’s Mushroom Serv., Inc. v. United States, 521 F.3d at 1343 ; Alves v. United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v. … Fiebelkorn v. United States, 77 Fed.Cl. 59, 62 (2007); see also Brown v. United States, 76 Fed.Cl. 762, 763 (2007). Even if Mr.

McLarnon v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 10, 2021

Cl. at 664 (quoting Browning Ferris Indus., Inc. & Subsidiaries v. United States, No. 05-738T, 2007 WL 1412087, at *1 (Fed. Cl. May 10, 2007)). … See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“The Tucker Act does not provide independent jurisdiction over . . . claims for equitable relief.” (citing United States v.

Shoshone Indian Tribe of Wind River Reservation v. United States

93 Fed. Cl. 449 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 5, 2010

See Brown v. … Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States (Brown Park Estates), 127 F.3d 1449 , 1456 (Fed.Cir.1997); see also Central Pines Land Co. v.

International Data Products Corp. v. United States

64 Fed. Cl. 642 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 28, 2005

The Board also found unpersuasive Okaw’s “fairness” argument. See infra Part II.C.2. … Though not binding on this Court, the views of the Boards of Contract Appeals are given careful consideration. Textron Def. Sys. v. Widnall, 143 F.3d 1465, 1468 (Fed.Cir.1998).

First Commerce Corp. v. United States

53 Fed. Cl. 38 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 26, 2002

United States v. Winstar Corp. … Ohio v.

Kinney v. United States

51 Fed. Cl. 126 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2001

Plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the correction board acted arbitrarily, capriciously, contrary to law, or that its determination was unsupported by substantial evidence. Arens v. … The Secretary “ ‘must base his decision on the record as the board presents it to him.’ ” Adkins v. United States, 68 F.3d 1317, 1325 (quoting Selman v. United States, 723 F.2d 877, 880 (Fed.Cir.1983)).

Teledyne, Inc. v. United States

50 Fed. Cl. 155 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 9, 2001

.”); Loral Corp. v. … Bowen v.

Lopez-Velazquez v. United States

85 Fed. Cl. 114 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 31, 2008

The court ‘“will not disturb the decision of [a] corrections board unless it is arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence.’ ” Barnes v. … I 2002), as recognized in Richey v. United States, 322 F.3d 1317, 1323-24 (Fed.Cir.2003). The Court of Federal Claims does not sit as “a super correction board.” Skinner v.

Blendu v. United States

79 Fed. Cl. 500 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2007

(footnote omitted) (quoting Brown v. State (Brown), 130 Wash.2d 430 , 924 P.2d 908, 915 (1996) (en banc)). The court then drew a distinction between the different meanings of the phrase “right of way.” Id. … Co., 1956 OK 246 , 303 P.2d 313, 316 (1956); Brown v. State, 130 Wash.2d 430 , 924 P.2d 908, 910, 914 (1996) (en banc); Roeder Co. v. K & E Moving & Storage, 102 Wash.App. 49 , 4 P.3d 839, 841 (2000).

Northern States Power Co. v. United States

43 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,450 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 6, 1999

of Contract Appeals (Board). … Marden Corp. v.

Taylor v. United States

57 Fed. Cl. 313 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 2003

“The generally accepted rule is that claims of entitlement to disability retirement pay do not accrue until the appropriate board either finally denies such a claim or refuses to hear it.” Real v. … Thus, “if the service member had neither requested nor been offered consideration by a retiring board prior to discharge, the later denial of his petition by the corrections board [is] the triggering event, not his discharge

Ocean View Towers Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. United States

88 Fed. Cl. 169 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 15, 2009

. § 1437f(b); see also Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. … Corp. v.

Branch v. United States

29 Fed. Cl. 606 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 20, 1993

Regulatory agencies such as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (“Board of Governors”) and the Federal Reserve … Similarly, in Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v.

Albino v. United States

93 Fed. Cl. 405 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 8, 2010

Judicial review of military correction boards is conducted under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706 (2006), and such review is generally limited to the administrative record. Walls v. … Mgmt., Inc. v.

H.B. Mac, Inc. v. United States

41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,028 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 25, 1996

Mojave Enterpr. v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 353, 356-57 (1983). In Youngdale & Sons Constr. Co., Et al. v. … Shea Co. v.

Kuwait Pearls Catering Company, Wll v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 2019

Kuwait Pearls Catering Co., WLL v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., No. H-15-0754, 2016 WL 1259518, at *1 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2016). … Kuwait Pearls Catering Company, WLL v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., 853 F.3d 173, 175 (5th Cir. 2017); ECF 1.