Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.01s
Ludwigsen Family Living Trust v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 3, 2017
* Plaintiff, * * MARYAM JAFARNIA, * Plaintiff, * * v … Jacqueline Camille Brown, United States Department of Justice, Environmental and Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStapp Towing Inc. v. United States
40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,839 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 27, 1995
The board was to determine plaintiff’s qualification to carry government fuel in the future. … Sehoner, the MTMC-EA contracting officer, the SBA-TX COC board, and the SBA-DC COC board.
Cited 46 timesPublished59 Fed. Cl. 327 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 14, 2004
Plaintiff appealed this decision to the Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals (PSBCA or Board). Id. at *2, 1998 PSBCA LEXIS 16, at *1. … See Steel Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGlobe Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. United States
65 Fed. Cl. 330 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 29, 2005
Dicta in Glendale Federal Bank, FSB v. … Bank, F.S.B. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedMls-Multinational Logistic Services, Ltd v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 11, 2019
Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 117 Fed. Cl. at 769 n.5. … Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 117 Fed. Cl. at 769 n.5.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFifth Third Bank v. United States
52 Fed. Cl. 829 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 12, 2002
Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 149-50 n. 3, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam) (“The rationale of [FED. R. CIV. … Moskal v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 15, 2021
Highway Comm’n v. … Yellow Book § 4.3.4.2 at 114 (emphasis in original). 7 Other state courts have similarly required adherence to corporate forms for unity of ownership purposes: North Carolina, Board of Transp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSantini v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
122 Fed. Cl. 102 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2015
. § 300aa-11(c)(1)(C)(ii); v. … On June 5−6, 2013, this case was joined with Barclay v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedCommunity Bank & Trust v. United States
54 Fed. Cl. 352 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 8, 2002
The Reserve Banks act to implement monetary policy at the direction of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (“Board of Governors”). … The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) has held that the Board of Governors is an NAFI. Denkler v. United States, 782 F.2d 1003, 1005 (Fed.Cir.1986).
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 22, 2021
Brown v. United States, 151 Fed. Cl. 530, 536 (2020). IV. … Gregory v. United States, 149 Fed. Cl. 719, 724 (2020). In Brown v. United States, the Court similarly held that “the taxpayer signature requirement is statutory and , therefore, cannot be waived.” Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 18, 2018
As the Indiana Supreme Court said in Brown v. Penn Cent. … Brown v. Penn Cent. Corp., 510 N.E.2d 641, 643-644 (Ind. 1987) (citations omitted); Ross, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 20, 2020
Cienega Gardens v. United States, 331 F.3d 1319, 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2003); Guggenheim v. … Good v. United States, 189 F.3d 1355, 1360 (Fed. Cir. 1999); see Ruckelshaus v.
Cited 0 timesPublished107 Fed. Cl. 119 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 2012
Machulas has filed a number of appeals from the Board to this court over the years. … Machulas did not carry his burden under the USERRA, the Board’s decision [denying the claim] is affirmed. Id. at 467 (emphasis removed). Mr.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAndalex Resources, Inc. v. United States
54 Fed. Cl. 563 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2002
Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (1997). 4 As the Federal Circuit explained, plaintiffs have removed themselves from the tax refund system and this court’s jurisdiction over tax refund claims. Id. … See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621 (1997). .
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 22, 2019
Cir. 2013), the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, id., or the Fourth Amendment, Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623-24 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Second, to the extent that Mr. … Brown, 105 F.3d at 624. Fifth, this court lacks jurisdiction over Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRocky Mountain Helium, LLC v. United States
123 Fed. Cl. 551 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 2015
.”); see also Roth v. … See Lujan v.
Cited 2 timesPublished90 Fed. Cl. 456 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 8, 2009
Electric Co. v. United States, 84 Fed.Cl. 129, 140 (2008) (“GE II”) (citing Perry v. … United States, 316 F.3d 1366 , 1373 (Fed.Cir.2003): When interpreting provisions of the CAS our task is “to ascertain the [Board’s] intended meaning when it promulgated the CAS.” Perry v.
Cited 1 timesPublished61 Fed. Cl. 420 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 29, 2004
The State Board of Adjustment found Mr. … Demutiis v. United States, 48 Fed.Cl. 81, 86 (2000).
Cited 5 timesPublishedPCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United States
84 Fed. Cl. 601 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 14, 2008
Servs., Inc. v. … Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMcDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States
41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,035 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 13, 1996
Brown, ASBCA 40043, 91-1 BCA 1123,293 at 116,816, 1990 WL 158914 (same); B.H.J. … Bareford v. General Dynamics Corp., 973 F.2d at 1143 (citing Fitzgerald v.
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna