Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.12s
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 29, 2019
Cl. 52.2; accord Ward v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 418, 427-32 (2017); Reaves v. United States, 128 Fed. Cl. 196, 200-03 (2016); Stuart v. United States, 123 Fed.Cl. 413, 422-23 (2015). … reports passover decisions by selection boards or special selection boards, and discharge orders.”
Cited 0 timesPublished130 Fed. Cl. 222 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 13, 2017
In its decision, the Board found that Mr. … Emplovment Development Deoartment that explains the minor discrepancy in the amount that the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board determined Mr.
Cited 6 timesPublishedAsco-Falcon II Shipping Co. v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,731 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 21, 1994
MA/MSB^39, for a 20-year term with the United States, represented by the Secretary of Commerce, 4 acting by and *599 through MarAd’s Maritime Subsidy Board (MSB or the Board). … In Oceanic Steamship Company v.
Cited 21 timesPublished71 Fed. Cl. 284 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 9, 2006
Bank v. … Corp. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · May 8, 2015
Under the USERRA, if a veteran has a claim and the "the employer is a [flederal executive agency," id. § 4322(a)(2)(B), jurisdiction to adjudicate the claim lies with the United States Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board … See also Bodus v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 3, 2020
.”); Towne Realty, Inc. v. United States, 1 Cl. Ct. 264, 270 (1982) (“The case is remanded to the board for further proceedings relevant to the determination of quantum.”). … In Krzeminski v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWashington Mutual, Inc. v. United States
130 Fed. Cl. 653 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 21, 2017
Amergen Energy v. United States, 779 F.3d 1368, 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2015); Detroit Edison Co. v. … V.
Cited 8 timesPublishedRosebud Sioux Tribe v. United States
75 Fed. Cl. 15 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 5, 2007
(quoting Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1456 (Fed.Cir.1997)). … Examining the same statutory and regulatory provisions governing leasing of Tribal lands now before this court, in Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSikorsky Aircraft Corp. v. United States
102 Fed. Cl. 38 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2011
Board of Trs. of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. … [were] not statements by the Board, they [were] vague, and they were written at least nine months after the promulgation of [the CAS in question].” 316 F.3d at 1377 ; cf. United States v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2023
See Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 (1983) (“Board decisions are subject to judicial review and can be set aside if they are arbitrary, capricious or not based on substantial evidence”). … The court does not sit as “a ‘super correction board.’” King v. United States, 149 Fed. Cl. 272, 275 (2020) (citing Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. at 331, 594 F.2d at 830).
Cited 0 timesPublished101 Fed. Cl. 92 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 25, 2011
Delaware Valley Floral Grp., Inc. v. Shaw Rose Nets, LLC, 597 F.3d 1374, 1383 (Fed.Cir.2010) (applying Eleventh Circuit law regarding Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e)); see also Board of Trs. of Bay Med. Ctr. v. … Puget Sound, 23 Cl.Ct. at 56-57 (1991) (citing Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 834 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Stonite Prods. Co. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished'Adbel-Al-Mu'mit v. United States
92 Fed. Cl. 422 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 19, 2010
Bell began to file numerous petitions with the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) and the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade in his discharge and reimbursement of back-pay. Mr. … Young v. United States, 529 F.3d 1880 , 1383 (Fed.Cir.2008). This is true even if a service member applies for relief from a military corrections board such as the ABCMR. Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesPublished35 Fed. Cl. 425 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 26, 1996
Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of New Mexico, 353 U.S. 232, 247 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 761 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) (Frankfurter, J., concurring) (citations omitted). … This representation is not entirely consistent with the Findings of Fact and Recommendation of the Hearing Board to the Supreme Court of Colorado. In its report, the Board states that “[Ms.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 2, 2017
* Plaintiff, * * MARYAM JAFARNIA, * Plaintiff, * * v … Jacqueline Camille Brown, United States Department of Justice, Environmental and Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrowning Ferris Industries, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. United States
75 Fed. Cl. 591 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 2, 2007
In Interlake Corp. v. … See Giannakos v.
Cited 3 timesPublished80 Fed. Cl. 376 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 1, 2008
“In fact, Title VII ‘provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment,’ Brown [v. … United States, 33 Fed.Cl. at 378 (citing Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Montalvo v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 744, 748 (1989); and Fausto v.
Cited 4 timesPublished51 Fed. Cl. 516 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 17, 2002
Tr. (2/13/01) at 52-53 (Browning). The CO then accepted an offer based on the Price Schedules submitted, and the Schedule of the winning offeror became part of the contract. Tr. (2/13/01) at 63-64 (Browning). … Torncello v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 20, 28 , 681 F.2d 756, 761 (1982) (citing Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United States, 262 U.S. 489 , 43 S.Ct. 592 , 67 L.Ed. 1086 (1923)); Mason v.
Cited 10 timesPublished107 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 20, 2012
When his claim was denied in 2002, plaintiff appealed to a Decision Review Officer and then to the Board of Veterans Appeals (“Board”), each of which denied his claim. … See Haas v. Peake, 525 F.3d 1168 (Fed.Cir.2008).
Cited 8 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 2023
Brown v. Legal Found. Wash., 538 U.S. 216, 233-35 (2003) (interest on IOLTA accounts); Horne v. Dep’t Agric., 576 U.S. 350, 360-61 (2015) (raisins); Armstrong v. United States, 364 U.S. 40, 48 (1960) (liens); James v. … (ECF 171 at 4 (discussing, among other cases, Brown v. Legal Found. Wash., 538 U.S. 216 (2003)).)
Cited 0 timesPublishedRichard R. Grooms v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 7, 2014
Accordingly, this court is not a “super correction board” responsible for determining which service members are fit to serve, Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed. … See Metz v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna