Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.48s
Global Military Marketing, Inc. v. United States
118 Fed. Cl. 624 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 29, 2014
As the Court held in Castle-Rose, Inc. v. … It is well settled that this Court only has jurisdiction against the United States of America, not against federal officials or agencies. 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCitizens Federal Bank, FSB v. United States
51 Fed. Cl. 682 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 20, 2002
Winstar Corp. v. … Winstar v. United States, 64 F.3d at 1544.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSheryl Taylor v. United States
114 Fed. Cl. 185 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 7, 2014
Taylor, Taylor v. Merit Systems Protection Board, No. 2013-3113, 2013 WL 5943153 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2013), reh’g en banc denied (Fed. … The Federal Circuit in Taylor v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 527 F. App’x 970, addressed plaintiff’s contention that she was entitled to federally-funded counsel before the Merit Systems Protection Board.
Cited 1 timesPublished74 Fed. Cl. 225 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 17, 2006
V. … V 3. .
Cited 9 timesPublished27 Fed. Cl. 96 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 10, 1992
Plaintiff subsequently appealed both the arbitration decision and the FLRA’s refusal to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). … Brown v. General Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 825 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1964 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). Plaintiff took advantage of this exception in his district court action filed in late 1990.
Cited 22 timesPublishedCalifornia Human Development Corp. v. United States
87 Fed. Cl. 282 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 5, 2009
Smalley & Sons, Inc. v. … Action Program, Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublished82 Fed. Cl. 216 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 10, 2008
We agree that any theory that you provide will be held in confidence by the Safety Board. … It is possible that your theory contains information that is known or actively being pursued by the Safety Board in its investigation.
Cited 1 timesPublishedKane County, Utah v. United States
127 Fed. Cl. 696 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 12, 2016
See, e.g., Dorsey v. United States, 132 S. … See, e.g., Ventas, Inc. v. United States, 381 F.3d 1156, 1161 (Fed.
Cited 4 timesPublished47 Fed. Cl. 118 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2000
The Brown & Williamson Case The briefs of the parties did not address the recent Supreme Court case, Food and Drug Administration v. … Brown & Williamson, 120 S.Ct. at 1297 (citing ETSI Pipeline Project v. Missouri, 484 U.S. 495, 517 , 108 S.Ct. 805 , 98 L.Ed.2d 898 (1988)).
Cited 0 timesPublished35 Fed. Cl. 526 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 31, 1996
Further, courts do not typically possess the broad equitable jurisdiction necessary to remedy what corrections boards and service secretaries may perceive as injustices. See Grieg v. … A court may not substitute its own judgment for that of a Board or Secretary if “reasonable minds could differ.” Vierrether v. United States, 27 Fed.Cl. 357, 361 (1992) (citations omitted).
Cited 5 timesPublishedCRANE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 4, 2024
Moran v. … Talwar is a board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special qualification in child neurology, clinical neurophysiology, and until 2018, was board-certified in psychiatry and neurology with a subspecialty certification
Cited 0 timesPublishedBayside Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States
64 Fed. Cl. 15 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 2, 2004
Plaintiff, Equisource Capital Corporation (“ECC”), seeks damages for the Federal Home Loan Bank Board’s (“FHLBB’s” or *16 “Board’s”) breach caused by the enactment of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement … Winstar v. United States, 64 F.3d 1531 (Fed.Cir. 1995) (en banc). .
Cited 2 timesPublished121 Fed. Cl. 482 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 28, 2015
Godfrey v. United States, 748 F.2d 1568, 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1984). … The Federal Circuit’s seminal opinion on section 6672 liability, Godfrey v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 23, 2025
See, e.g., Doster v. … Navy Seals 1–26 v.
Cited 0 timesPublished124 Fed. Cl. 452 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 7, 2016
As the Court has explained, see Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 117 Fed. … See Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., 117 Fed.
Cited 10 timesPublished73 Fed. Cl. 631 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2006
(quoting Roth v. United States, 378 F.3d 1371, 1381 (Fed.Cir.2004) (quoting Caddington v. United States, 147 Ct.Cl. 629, 632 , 178 F.Supp. 604 (1959))). … Murphy v. United States, 165 Ct.Cl. 156 (1964) (citing United States v. Fenno, 167 F.2d 593, 595 (2d Cir.1948)).
Cited 4 timesPublished50 Fed. Cl. 192 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 10, 2001
The Board of Trustees of the Seattle Police Relief and Pension Fund (Board of Trustees) also awarded Officer Davis’s family these state benefits after determining that Officer Davis died “as a proximate result of the performance … The BJA Director, however, makes no mention of the Board of Trustees’ or Seattle Police Department’s decisions.
Cited 9 timesPublished32 Fed. Cl. 256 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 1994
Brown, Commander of the 807th Medical Brigade, removed Collins from his command position. This decision was based upon the recommendation of Colonel Roger M. Weed, Commander of the 831st Medical Detachment. … Schneider v. United States, 27 F.3d 1327, 1332 (8th Cir.1994); see also Hata v. United States, 23 F.3d 230, 232-33 (9th Cir.1994); Rodrigue v. United States, 968 F.2d 1430, 1432-34 (1st Cir.1992); Poindexter v.
Cited 3 timesPublished28 Fed. Cl. 202 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 4, 1993
(citing Seattle Box Co. v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., 731 F.2d 818, 826 (Fed.Cir. 1984)). . Sternberger v. … United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433, 440-41 , 96 S.Ct. 3021, 3025-26 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1976); Danville Plywood Corp. v. United States, 899 F.2d 3, 7-8 (Fed.Cir.1990). . Helvering v.
Cited 7 timesPublished95 Fed. Cl. 491 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 18, 2010
The court does not sit, however, as a “super correction board.” Skinner v. United States, 694 F.2d 824 , 830 (Ct.Cl.1979). … Under the precedent of Skidmore v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna