Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.93s
46 Fed. Cl. 120 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 29, 2000
See, e.g., Adkins v. … See Sammt v. United States, 780 F.2d 31, 33 (Fed.Cir.1985) (as construed in Bell v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 73, 76 (1991)); Thomas v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSouthern California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United States
51 Fed. Cl. 114 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 24, 2001
RCFC 41(b); Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211, 228 , 115 S.Ct. 1447 , 131 L.Ed.2d 328 (1995); Spruill v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 978 F.2d 679, 686-88 (Fed.Cir.1992); Martin v. … Block v. North Dakota ex rel. Board of Univ. and School Lands, 461 U.S. 273, 287 , 103 S.Ct. 1811 , 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983).
Cited 3 timesPublished64 Fed. Cl. 215 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 18, 2005
See Jama v. … Bankers Ass’n v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedGCC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
91 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 23, 2009
Assocs. v. … Assocs., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDyncorp International LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 8, 2020
The Army evaluated each offeror’s proposal; the Cost/Price Factor Chair completed a Final Cost/Price Evaluation Report for each offeror in every COCOM and Afghanistan, the Source Selection Evaluation Board (“SSEB”) issued … See Fluor Intercontinental, Inc. v. United States, No. 19-1580, ECF No. 52; PAE-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC v.
Cited 0 timesPublished74 Fed. Cl. 439 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2006
Subsequent to this determination, plaintiff was referred by a Medical Evaluation Board to be evaluated by an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (the “IPEB”) on July 12, 2000. AR 139. … Stat. § 448.02 (3) (2006) (“The board shall investigate allegations of unprofessional conduct and negligence in treatment by persons holding a license, certificate or limited permit granted by the board.”); see also N.Y.
Cited 13 timesPublishedAmerican Capital Corp. v. United States
58 Fed. Cl. 398 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2003
Transohio II, 967 F.2d at 617 (quoting Bank Board Resolution 86-864 at 8); see also PLApp. at 21. … Bank, FSB v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedLong Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United States
54 Fed. Cl. 607 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 9, 2002
From December 1982 until May 1992, Conway served as Board of Trustees Chairman and CEO of LISB. B. … Conway should have told the board he was receiving nearly $500,000 from the law firm? A: I think he informed everybody. Q: You were aware of that as a member of the board? A: Yes. Sept. 29, 2000 Deposition of Edwin M.
Cited 7 timesPublished96 Fed. Cl. 226 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 23, 2010
Reynolds v. Army & Air Force Exch. Serv., 846 F.2d 746, 748 (Fed.Cir.1988) (citing Zunamon v. Brown, 418 F.2d 883, 886 (8th Cir.1969)). … Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)). C.
Cited 35 timesPublished57 Fed. Cl. 283 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 2003
.”); Brown v. United States 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997) (“The Court of Federal Claims ... lacks jurisdiction over tort actions against the United States.”); LeBlanc v. … Booth is identified in the proposed settlement documents as "Attomey[] for HUD, P & A [Pope & Associates, P.C.], POPE and BROWNING.” .
Cited 7 timesPublished36 Fed. Cl. 651 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 2, 1996
Plaintiff bears the burden of showing by cogent and clearly convincing evidence that there was a material legal error or injustice in the correction board proceeding. Chayra v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 172,178 (1991). … When a plaintiff has not presented additional evidence to the court reviewing a correction board’s decision, he is not entitled to a trial de novo. See de Cicco v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 224 , 677 F.2d 66, 70 (1982).
Cited 29 timesPublished106 Fed. Cl. 129 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 31, 2012
Brown v. United States, 74 Fed.Cl. 546, 550 (2006) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1631 ). … Defendant fleetingly discusses the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) as a potential forum for Mr.
Cited 2 timesPublishedFederal Group, Inc. v. United States
67 Fed. Cl. 87 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 29, 2005
While the contracting officer denied the supplier’s claims for breach of contract based on faulty estimates, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, citing Womack v. … Brown Constructors, 132 F.3d at 729 (citations omitted).
Cited 10 timesPublished76 Fed. Cl. 297 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 26, 2007
See Todd v. … See Modem, v.
Cited 0 timesPublished72 Fed. Cl. 187 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 25, 2006
Bolduc not prosecuted in the wake of the intervening federal conviction, the Massachusetts parole board decided to release Mr. Bolduc from prison in November, 1999. Bolduc v. … A third case, Brown v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDuane Omar Burnett v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 28, 2021
Ladd v. United States, 630 F.3d 1015, 1023–24 (Fed. Cir. 2010); Barclay v. … (“STB” or “Board”).2 See Chicago & N.W.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 25, 2024
Brown v. United States, 22 F.4th 1008, 1011 (Fed. Cir. 2022). Under United States v. … Brown, 22 F.4th at 1011; see Vensure HR, Inc. v. United States, --- F.4th ---, No. 23-1640, 2024 WL 4399384, at *4-6 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2024).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSra International, Inc. v. United States
114 Fed. Cl. 247 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 14, 2014
Brown, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Arlington, VA, Counsel for the Government. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BRADEN, Judge. I. … See Gonzalez v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedAlaska Pulp Corp. v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 655 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 14, 2001
See, e.g., Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. … board feet.
Cited 6 timesPublishedHarvest Institute Freedman Federation v. United States
80 Fed. Cl. 197 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 15, 2008
Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Development Company v. U.S., 127 F.3d 1449 , 1455 (Fed.Cir.1997). Plaintiffs’ alleged claims accrued at the latest in 1902. … Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Development Company, 127 F.3d 1449 at 1456 (citing Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct.Cl. 1, 8 , 310 F.2d 381 (1962)). See also Hatter v.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna