Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.38s
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2025
Williams v. United States, 116 Fed. Cl. 149, 157 (2014). The court reviews decisions by military correction boards under Administrative Procedure Act standards. Walls v. United States, 582 F.3d 1358, 1367 (Fed. … “The correction board’s decision must also be sufficiently detailed for the court to ascertain the reasoning behind the denial of relief to the applicant.” Keller v. United States, 113 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished74 Fed. Cl. 692 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 29, 2006
Ltd. v. United States, 133 F.3d 874, 879 (Fed.Cir.1998) (citing Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1456 (Fed.Cir.1997); Friedman v. … See, e.g., Brown Park Estates, 127 F.3d at 1456; Wells v. United States, 420 F.3d 1343, 1345 (Fed.Cir.2005).
Cited 9 timesPublished101 Fed. Cl. 416 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 13, 2011
R.R., 490 N.W.2d 726, 732 (S.D.1992) (holding, under South Dakota law, recreational trail use is a "public highway” use “compatible and consistent with its prior use as a public railway.”), overruled by Brown v. … See Brown, 732 N.W.2d at 739 (“To the extent that this holding conflicts with Barney, Barney is overruled.”). .
Cited 32 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 25, 2019
For example, in Tiburzi v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Dep’t of Army, 157 F. App’x 295, 297-98 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Gray v. Dep’t of Defense, 91 F. App’x 137, 140 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. United States
86 Fed. Cl. 183 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 20, 2009
Brown advising them to put Plaintiffs correct name on the pleading. (Pl.’s Ex. C). At 12:01 PM (CST), Ms. Hinkle sent an email to Mr. McMillin, Mr. McClintock, and Ms. Brown stating that “I just confirmed that the U.S. … See Ak-Chin Indian Comty. v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDNC Parks & Resorts at Yosemite, Inc. v. United States
133 Fed. Cl. 314 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 2017
value of such improvements and personal property equal to the prime lending rate, effective on the date the temporary operator assumes managerial and operational responsibilities, as published by the Federal Reserve System Board … (citing Alaska Lumber & Pulp Co. v. Madigan, 2 F.3d 389, 392 (Fed. Cir. 1993) and Interwest Constr. v. Brown, 29 F.3d 611, 615 (Fed. Cir. 1994)). 6 III.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPacific Northern Timber Co. v. United States
38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,455 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 18, 1992
Crown Coat Front Co. v. … In Bird & Sons, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAts Ford Drive Investment, LLC
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 23, 2021
See, e.g., Tazian v. Cline, 686 N.E.2d 95, 96, 98 (Ind. 1997) (construing a deed executed in 1873 and not mentioning the railroad company’s charter); Brown v. Penn Cent. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 23, 2021
See, e.g., Tazian v. Cline, 686 N.E.2d 95, 96, 98 (Ind. 1997) (construing a deed executed in 1873 and not mentioning the railroad company’s charter); Brown v. Penn Cent. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished63 Fed. Cl. 396 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 21, 2004
Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1456 (Fed.Cir.1997). This doctrine has been applied in eases such as Cook v. … Id. at 96 , 111 S.Ct. 453 ; see also Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984).
Cited 13 timesPublished60 Fed. Cl. 433 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 2004
This court has stated that routing a challenge to a military action through a board of correction of military records does not confer jurisdiction in this court where there was none before. Flute v. … This court has also stated that a military correction board decision is justiciable even where the underlying militaiy personnel decision is entirely discretionary. Krauss v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAmerican Management Systems, Inc. v. United States
53 Fed. Cl. 525 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 30, 2002
Plaintiffs complaint, filed on October 10, 2001, challenges the Thrift Board’s termination decision and asks this court to declare the Thrift Board in breach of contract. … L’Enfant Plaza Props., Inc. v. United States, 229 Ct.Cl. 278 , 668 F.2d 1211 (Ct.Cl.1982); Kyer v. United States, 177 Ct.Cl. 747 , 369 F.2d 714 (1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 929 , 87 S.Ct. 2050 , 18 L.Ed.2d 990 (1967).
Cited 0 timesPublished40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,886 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 2, 1996
(citations omitted); Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. … See Northrop Corp. v. United States, 27 Fed.
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited Computer Supplies, Inc. v. United States
43 Fed. Cl. 351 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 2, 1999
Unless the court first concludes that no substantial evidence supports the board’s findings, it should not “decide an issue of fact not decided by the Board, or contrary to the finding made by the Board.” … Although conclusions of law are not binding, the board’s interpretation of a contract is accorded considerable deference and respect. See Fortec Constructors v.
Cited 1 timesPublished90 Fed. Cl. 466 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 8, 2009
Viacom, Inc. v. United States, 70 Fed.Cl. 649 (2006), amended by CBS Corp. v. United States, 75 Fed.Cl. 498 (2007). … Motors Corp. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · May 20, 2025
Day filed a complaint in this court on the day the board issued the interim notice. ECF No. 1 at 1. She alleges that the government, through the board, effected a Fifth Amendment taking of her property. … Day cites Dobyns v. United States, 91 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAcademy Facilities Management v. United States
87 Fed. Cl. 441 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 17, 2009
A Technical Evaluation Board (TEB) reviewed the final proposal revisions of the offerors in the competitive range, and produced the following ratings, which were agreed with and adopted by the Source Selection Advisory Board … B3H, 75 F.3d 1577 (Fed.Cir.1996) (holding that Board of Contract Appeals should defer to agency’s best value decision as long as it is “grounded in reason ... even if the Board itself might have chosen a different bidder”
Cited 33 timesPublishedSUFI Network Services, Inc. v. United States
102 Fed. Cl. 656 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 17, 2012
Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. … See Slattery v.
Cited 10 timesPublished120 Fed. Cl. 801 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 30, 2015
Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623- 24 (Fed. Cn.1997). … Joshua v. United States, 17 F.3d 378,379 (Fed. Cir. 1994); Treviffo v. United States, 113 Fed.
Cited 13 timesPublished107 Fed. Cl. 348 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 14, 2012
Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 873 (Fed.Cir.1993). … Adkins v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna