Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.81s
Theisen Vending Co. v. United States
58 Fed. Cl. 194 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 20, 2003
Brown v. Miss. Valley State Univ., 311 F.3d 328 , 333 n. 5 (5th Cir.2002). See also Price ex rel. Price r. W. Res., Inc., 232 F.3d 779, 783 (10th Cir.2000) (“Rule 56(f) does not operate automatically. … .”); Leonardo v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2025
Williams v. United States, 116 Fed. Cl. 149, 157 (2014). The court reviews decisions by military correction boards under Administrative Procedure Act standards. Walls v. United States, 582 F.3d 1358, 1367 (Fed. … “The correction board’s decision must also be sufficiently detailed for the court to ascertain the reasoning behind the denial of relief to the applicant.” Keller v. United States, 113 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDouglas J. Smith v. United States
111 Fed. Cl. 740 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 19, 2013
Although a soldier may seek relief through other boards such as the Army Physical Disability Appeal Board and the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, the PDES process specifically includes reviews by the USAPDA … Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United States, 161 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (citing McNutt v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. of Ind., 298 U.S. 178, 189 (1936)).
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 3, 2021
See, e.g., Tazian v. Cline, 686 N.E.2d 95, 96, 98 (Ind. 1997) (construing a deed executed in 1873 and not mentioning the railroad company’s charter); Brown v. Penn Cent. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 29, 2017
Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006); Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 94–95 (1998). … Chisolm v. United States, 82 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublished64 Fed. Cl. 776 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 23, 2005
Importantly, the court does not sit as a “super correction board.” Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 322 , 594 F.2d 824, 830 (1979). … In Sawyer v. United, States, 930 F.2d 1577, 1581 (Fed.Cir.1991) the Federal Circuit stated that both review boards and correction boards are “competent to make a disability determination.”
Cited 7 timesPublished3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 27, 2022
Also to be taken into account are the six separate prior applications post- complaint for inter partes review filed by the United States with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). See Joint Prelim. … It alleged invalidity as to the ’085 patent based on the Monroe, Currie, Brown, and Mogenis prior art references. Defs.’ Mot., Ex. 5.
Cited 0 timesPublished44 Fed. Cl. 764 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 29, 1999
Plaintiff appealed the DAADB’s decision to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”). Plaintiff was not permitted to appear before the Board. … See Doty v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedAcademy Facilities Management v. United States
87 Fed. Cl. 441 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 17, 2009
A Technical Evaluation Board (TEB) reviewed the final proposal revisions of the offerors in the competitive range, and produced the following ratings, which were agreed with and adopted by the Source Selection Advisory Board … B3H, 75 F.3d 1577 (Fed.Cir.1996) (holding that Board of Contract Appeals should defer to agency’s best value decision as long as it is “grounded in reason ... even if the Board itself might have chosen a different bidder”
Cited 33 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 3, 2018
TR 761 (Garrett); TR 910 (Brown) (Plaintiff’s expert geologist clarifying he “never meant to imply [that the Army Corps] should have just added two feet across the board”). … BROWN: Yes, I would. TR 934 (Brown). Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Federal Bank, FSB v. United States
60 Fed. Cl. 493 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 2004
Bank, FSB v. United, States, 58 Fed.Cl. 429, 431 (2003). … See, e.g., Magee v. Paul Revere Life Ins.
Cited 3 timesPublished119 Fed. Cl. 254 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 5, 2014
The Army referred his case to an Entry Physical Standards Board, which determined on August 20, 2008, that Mr. … In Metz v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United States
53 Fed. Cl. 479 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 28, 2002
See, e.g., Otinger [v. Water Works & Sanitary Seiver Board, 278 Ala. 213 , 177 So.2d 320 (1965) ]; Ala. Code tit. 7A, § 2-718 (1966 Recomp.). … Co. v. United States, 188 Ct.Cl. 62 , 411 F.2d 1238, 1240-41 (1969) (affirming a Board finding that a contractor had failed to meet its burden); Northern Va. Elec. Co. v. United States, 230 Ct.
Cited 11 timesPublishedVanguard Recovery Assistance v. United States
99 Fed. Cl. 81 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 27, 2011
AR 99-5152 (Second Board-wine Deck). Ms. … See Lujan v.
Cited 41 timesPublished40 Fed. Cl. 247 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 27, 1998
Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153,1156 (Fed.Cir.1983) (quoting Clayton v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 593 , 595 (1980)); see also Sanders v. … The plaintiffs cite one case, Midgett v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPrecise Systems, Inc. v. United States
120 Fed. Cl. 586 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 6, 2015
Curtis’ weighted voting power on the Board of Directors ensured that he retained complete control over all of the Board’s decisions. Likewise, Mr. … Co. v. Natural Res. Def.
Cited 7 timesPublished49 Fed. Cl. 413 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 15, 2001
Cottrell v. … The board shall file a written report with the coxxrt on or before August 15, 2001. In its report, the board shall clearly set forth the factual and legal basis for its decision. See SEC v.
Cited 0 timesPublished123 Fed. Cl. 701 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 9, 2015
Claims regarding a service member’s entitlement to retirement pay first accrue when “the appropriate military board either . . . denies the claim or refuses to hear it.” Chambers v. … Young v. United States, 529 F .3d 1380, 1385 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (citing United States V.
Cited 0 timesPublished87 Fed. Cl. 413 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 26, 2009
Corp. v. … See Moden v.
Cited 5 timesPublished74 Fed. Cl. 692 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 29, 2006
Ltd. v. United States, 133 F.3d 874, 879 (Fed.Cir.1998) (citing Brown Park Estates-Fairfield Dev. Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1449 , 1456 (Fed.Cir.1997); Friedman v. … See, e.g., Brown Park Estates, 127 F.3d at 1456; Wells v. United States, 420 F.3d 1343, 1345 (Fed.Cir.2005).
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna