Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersuscfcFS

4,740 results

1.13s

  • Little v. United States

    124 Fed. Cl. 256 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 23, 2015

    In their sur-reply, plaintiffs put forth new and additional reasons on which they base their request for relief, which either were not clearly asserted previously or were entirely absent in their original complaint or amended … As interpreted by the United States Supreme Court, the Tucker Act waives sovereign immunity to allow jurisdiction over claims against the United States (1) founded on an express or implied contract with the United States,

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Shell USA, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 26, 2023

    Cl. 645, 659-60 (2015) (holding immunity was waived by a provision establishing “[a] late charge of five percent (5%) of any payment not paid when due . . . plus a service charge of [1.5%] per month . . . shall be made on … First, the avgas contracts contain an express waiver of immunity for CERCLA charges, and CERCLA establishes that interest is recoverable as a charge.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dms Imaging, Inc. v. United States

    123 Fed. Cl. 645 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 27, 2015

    “If a reasonable probability of damage can be clearly established, uncertainty as to the amount will not preclude recovery.” Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc. v. Barram, 226 F.3d 1329, 1333 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (quoting Locke v. … The frustration of purpose doctrine is clearly inapplicable here.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Astor v. United States

    79 Fed. Cl. 303 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 13, 2007

    Namely, Defendant cannot show that (1) Plaintiffs qualify as “teachers” engaged in the “imparting of knowledge,” or (2) FLETC qualifies as *306 an “educational establishment.” … FLETC Does Not Qualify as an “Educational Establishment” under OPM’s FLSA Regulations.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Charette v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

    33 Fed. Cl. 488 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 10, 1995

    Second, petitioner cited a provision indicating that the National Vaccine Act was established “to achieve optimal prevention of human infectious diseases through immunization.” 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1. … State immunization laws require children to be vaccinated.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

    85 Fed. Cl. 571 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 15, 2009

    To this end, the authors established criteria or qualifying conditions for “case” children, which included convulsions lasting “more than about” half an hour. … While the Federal Circuit has clearly held that “identification and proof of specific biological mechanisms” are not required to establish causation, see Knudsen, 35 F.3d at 549 , and that “a sequence hitherto unproven in

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Holihan v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

    45 Fed. Cl. 201 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 14, 1999

    He characterizes these sections as the qualifying criteria, entitlement, and the calculation formula. … ”, such that the full amount would automatically be awarded upon the establishment of an impairment under the terms of the Act.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Estate of Arrowood v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

    28 Fed. Cl. 453 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 1993

    Standards were established for conduct of proceedings on a petition. Section 12(d)(3)(B). … Clearly, the special master appropriately applied the correct burden of proof in this case after weighing all the evidence including the testimony of the witnesses, and Exhibit 2, which clearly documents the administration

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Flores v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2021

    For example, program case law has clearly established that many common vaccine-related treatments that have resulted in inpatient hospitalization by themselves do not qualify for compensation under the surgical intervention … immunity. (Resp’t’s Mot. at 12).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frost v. United States

    115 Fed. Cl. 252 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 25, 2014

    It is firmly established that the United States is immune from suit unless it has specifically waived sovereign immunity. See, e.g., United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976); United States v. … In sum, a waiver of sovereign immunity must be “unequivocally expressed,” INS v. St.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Qantas Airways Ltd. v. United States

    30 Fed. Cl. 851 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 28, 1994

    The Government concedes that Qantas met the established criteria for a controlled entity of a foreign sovereign. … immunity.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fields v. United States

    39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,580 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 1993

    United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 248, 250 (1992), Judge Nettesheim stated that: The purpose of the EAJA is to lift the “bar of sovereign immunity for award of fees in suits brought by litigants qualifying under the statute.” … affidavit is clearly insufficient); United States v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Gray v. United States

    69 Fed. Cl. 95 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 6, 2005

    Gray, as the plaintiff, has the burden of establishing the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction over her claims. See McNutt v. … However, “[i]n light of [the Court’s] established practice of construing waivers of sovereign immunity narrowly in favor of the sovereign,” the Court held that the Federal Government had not waived its immunity against monetary

    Cited 89 timesPublished
  • Waleryszak v. Secretary of the Department Health & Human Services

    45 Fed. Cl. 573 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 15, 1999

    Petitioners have since conceded that no Table Injury may be established. See discussion infra Part III of Discussion. … The record clearly shows that Dr. Sladky has a well established record of diagnosing neurological diseases, has written numerous medical literature on the subject matter, and is a board certified pediatric neurologist.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Athey v. United States

    123 Fed. Cl. 42 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 31, 2015

    “Pay, Allowances, or Differentials” Even if plaintiffs qualify as “employee[s]” who suffered an “unjustified or unwarranted personnel action,” they can only recover under the Back Pay Act if they also establish that … Under well-established principles of sovereign immunity, waivers of sovereign immunity cannot be implied, and ambiguities must be construed in favor of the United States.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Contreras v. United States

    64 Fed. Cl. 583 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2005

    And finally, they claim that once Customs established an FLPA program under section 4523, its discretion to refuse to award FLPAs to otherwise qualified law enforcement officers ceased. See Pis.’ Corr. … Plaintiffs, however, also argue, citing Fisher I, that White Mountain Apache “established] a new test for determining whether a statute is money-mandating,” and that “[t]he new test clearly lowers the threshold fo[r] establishing

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Ezenia!, Inc. v. United States

    80 Fed. Cl. 60 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 4, 2008

    It is clear to the Court that even though Ezenia states clearly that it *62 is not challenging the Army’s decision to standardize, that is exactly what Ezenia is challenging. … Ezenia is a qualified vendor on the FSS. However, Ezenia does not sell the Adobe Breeze product.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Minehan v. United States

    75 Fed. Cl. 249 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 26, 2007

    Plaintiffs effort to establish an exception to the writing requirement as a result of that phraseology is, however, untenable. … The Supreme Court has stated clearly that no such tolling is permitted.

    Cited 247 timesPublished
  • Depena v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    133 Fed. Cl. 535 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 9, 2017

    Immunologists generally divide the immune system into two branches: the innate immune system and the adaptive immune system. Innate Immune System. … The special master qualified Dr. Lokshin as an expert in pediatric pulmonology and declared that Dr.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States

    60 Fed. Cl. 611 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 19, 2004

    With exceptions not herein relevant, see, e.g., 13 U.S.C. § 9 (a) (2000) (certain census reports "shall be immune from legal process, and shall not, without the consent of the individual or establishment concerned, be admitted … By comparison, many other well-established privileges may be overcome by a showing of strong need. See, e.g., Zenith Radio Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.