Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstxsd

2,190 results

1.09s

  • Jones v. Dickerson

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Nov 5, 2020

    These claims are barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity. … The Court will determine the defendants’ respective entitlements to qualified immunity should plaintiff timely file an amended complaint sufficiently repleading one or more of the claims dismissed without prejudice in this

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dugas v. The United States Of America

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Oct 30, 2019

    A claim has no arguable basis in fact if “after providing the plaintiff the opportunity to present additional facts when necessary, the facts alleged are clearly baseless.” Talib v. … Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 554 (1967)). 4/9 “Few doctrines were more solidly established at common law than the immunity of judges from liability for damages for acts committed within their judicial jurisdiction

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ed & F Man Biofuels Ltd. v. Mv Fase

    728 F. Supp. 2d 862 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Jul 23, 2010

    . -, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1940 , 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009)(5-4), the Supreme Court, applying the Twombly plausibility standard to a Bivens claim of unconstitutional discrimination and a defense of qualified immunity for government … That qualified immunity applies regardless of whether the conduct is wrongful for purposes of the underlying lawsuit. Id. The court may decide issues of justifiable reliance as a matter of law.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Toliver v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

    973 F. Supp. 2d 707 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Sep 19, 2013

    The “O” code, like the “OC” code, is clearly defined in the CRRG. … Hovnanian required a minimum credit score of 660 in order to qualify for a mortgage, 96 a reasonable jury might conclude that the impact that the LVNV account had on Toliver’s credit score caused her to no longer qualify

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Rothfos Corp. v. M/V NUEVO LEON

    123 F. Supp. 2d 362 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Apr 18, 2000

    (quoting Harbert Int’l Establishment v. … This is clearly insufficient to establish his expertise under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and Kumho *373 Tire Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Borden v. Fort Bend County

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Mar 17, 2020

    The Fifth Amendment Claim The Bordens contend that the Medical Defendants deprived Tacoma Borden of her clearly established rights under both the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments … The court denied a previous motion to invoke qualified immunity and dismiss the § 1983 claims against FBC Defendant Garza. Dkt 28.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rainly Equipos de Riego v. Pentagon Freight Services, Inc.

    979 F. Supp. 1079 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Sep 29, 1997

    Consequently, the Court finds that Defendant qualifies as a carrier under COGSA. 2 Next, Plaintiff has established a prima facie case for recovery under COGSA by showing that the pipe was undamaged when delivered to Pentagon … Pentagon clearly had knowledge of the contents of each container, since it loaded the containers itself.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Arredondo Ex Rel. Lopez v. Brockette

    482 F. Supp. 212 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Dec 19, 1979

    In Shapiro, supra, the Court clearly noted that residency and one-year residency were two separate and distinct prerequisites for welfare assistance. 394 U.S. at 636 , 89 S.Ct. at 1332 , 22 L.Ed.2d at 616 . … Likewise, if a managing conservator is appointed, his domicile establishes that of the child. Id. § 14.02.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • King v. Stevenson Beer Distributing Co.

    11 F. Supp. 3d 772 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Mar 27, 2014

    The evidence in the record clearly demonstrates that each sales team was a unit or subdivision of the sales department with permanent status and function at SBD and that King regularly directed the work of more than two full-time … “To establish disparate treatment!

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company

    349 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Aug 10, 1972

    However, there has never been any established procedure for transferring seniority from one department to another. … to insure that any employee seeking to exercise these transfer rights is reasonably qualified for the job sought.

    Modified by Johnson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 491 F.2d 1364 (1974)Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Kelly Law Firm, P.C. v. an Attorney for You

    679 F. Supp. 2d 755 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Dec 16, 2009

    Defendants further promised to deliver 3800-5100 Qualified and Targeted Birth Injury Leads ... 4. … Conclusion Considering the relevant private and public interest factors, the court concludes that Calliope has not met its burden of establishing that the Southern District of California is clearly more convenient than the

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Morris v. BC OLYMPIAKOS, SFP

    721 F. Supp. 2d 546 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Jun 30, 2010

    Stavropoulos states clearly that his declaration is premised solely “upon [his] review of the books and records of Olympiakos.” … Without more, such evidence does not help establish continuous and systematic contacts.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Pouncy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

    499 F. Supp. 427 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Jul 9, 1980

    Also, the evidence clearly demonstrated that current employee evaluations are, in fact, utilized in selecting employees for promotion. 72. … to rebut it by establishing that the reasons established by defendant were pretextual.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. Hellerstedt

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Jul 3, 2023

    Once put at issue, the party asserting jurisdiction has the burden to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that it properly exists. … The plaintiff must clearly allege facts at the pleading stage establishing all three criteria. Spokeo Inc v Robins, 578 US 330, 338 (2016).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Carr v. Brazoria County, Texas

    341 F. Supp. 155 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Feb 5, 1972

    For reasons apparently sufficient to defendants, the procedure established by Article 2351% (a) was not implemented. … and until his successor shall be elected and qualified.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Olley v. TodmanThe clerks office is ORDERED to not accept any further filings in this matter until the motions to dismiss are ruled on..

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Aug 12, 2025

    the certified agency, having so commenced such proceedings, fail[ed] to carry forward such proceedings with reasonable promptness; or (C) the Secretary determine[d] that the certified agency no longer qualifies … or Congress has clearly abrogated it.’”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mix v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Nov 20, 2024

    The Appeals Council denied Plaintiff’s request for review, 5 Primary immunodeficiency disorders — also called primary immune disorders or primary immunodeficiency — weaken the immune system, allowing infections and other … Other courts have found it is reversible error to not consider whether a medically determinable diagnosis of fibromyalgia qualifies a claimant for benefits because a claimant can establish fibromyalgia is a qualifying

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Chowdhury

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Mar 18, 2026

    They are also immune from Plaintiff’s state law claims due to sovereign and qualified immunity. B. … Once again, however, Eleventh Amendment immunity presents a problem. “Section 1983 does not abrogate Eleventh Amendment Immunity,” Champagne v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ryan v. Hercules Offshore, Inc.

    945 F. Supp. 2d 772 · District Court, S.D. Texas · May 13, 2013

    It was “well-established that maritime claims do no ‘aris[e] under the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States’ for purposes of federal question and removal jurisdiction.” Id. … A defendant who desires to remove a maritime action from state court must establish diversity jurisdiction.” Id. In Tennessee Gas Pipeline v.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Hardin v. T.D.C.J.

    District Court, S.D. Texas · Dec 20, 2019

    Because Texas has not waived its immunity, Hardin cannot recover monetary damages from TDCJ because, as a state agency, it is immune from suit. See Talib v. … under the Eleventh Amendment is “clearly established” in this circuit).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.