Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,742 results
1.10s
Waller v. City of Fort Worth Texas
District Court, N.D. Texas · Jan 25, 2021
By June 20, 2016, following the Court’s scheduling order (ECF No. 140), the officers filed motions to dismiss based on their qualified-immunity defense. … Because qualified immunity is unavailable to municipalities, the proceedings did not include the City.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGarza v. Energy Transfer Partners LLC
District Court, N.D. Texas · Mar 7, 2024
He also maintains that he “clearly suffered an adverse employment action” when “he was kept from returning to work until he was ultimately terminated from his employment.” P. Br. (ECF No. 30) at 45. … reference individual portions of Garza’s pleadings as to these additional claims, the court deems defendants’ statement adequate to meet their summary judgment burden, because doing so allows the court to dispose of these clearly
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · Nov 21, 2025
filed this Motion for Summary Judgment, asserting that Grado’s claims should be dismissed for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies and, alternatively asserting that Grado’s claims against her are barred by qualified … immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSBC Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
981 F. Supp. 996 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Dec 31, 1997
An analysis under the applicable standards for a bill of attainder show that this is clearly what the statutes are. … However, the statute allowed those failing to timely register to qualify for aid by filing late. Id. at 850 , 104 S.Ct. at 3353-54 .
Cited 5 timesPublished314 F. Supp. 1217 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Jun 17, 1970
Clearly, the question whether to abstain concerning an injunction against the enforcement of state criminal laws is divorced from concerns of abstention in rendering a declaratory judgment. Quoting from Zwickler v. … We need not here delineate the factors which could qualify the right of a mother to have an abortion.
Cited 39 timesPublishedJay v. United States Department of Agriculture
308 F. Supp. 100 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Dec 30, 1969
Although plaintiffs Jay and Doss qualify for, and are in great need of, Federal food assistance, they receive no aid solely because of their county of residence. 3. … Congress has clearly declared its intent that the Federal food programs be implemented and made available “to the maximum extent practicable.” 7 U.S.C. § 2011 . 5.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNunez-Renck v. International Business Machines Corporation
District Court, N.D. Texas · Apr 5, 2024
When the plaintiff has not presented direct evidence of employment discrimination, she must make a prima facie showing of discrimination by establishing that (1) she is a member of a protected class; (2) she was qualified … Nuñez still does not clearly identify the protected activity in which she engaged. Although she apparently testified for IBM in the Kingston v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFiberco Inc v. Acadia Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. Texas · Nov 15, 2023
April 10, 2021 (the “Policy”).2 In April 2020, the building suffered damage from a hailstorm while the Policy was 1 The Court’s Order on the parties’ motions for summary judgment concludes that FiberCo did not establish … As an initial matter, however, Day is clearly qualified, and his reports are relevant to the action.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · Feb 23, 2023
The factual resume set forth the penalty Movant faced, the elements of the offense, and the stipulated facts establishing that Movant had committed the offense. CR ECF No. 15. … Here, the Court clearly expressed by detailed reasons that the same sentence would be imposed even had the guideline range been improperly calculated. Molina-Martinez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · Feb 6, 2020
Higgs, 892 F.2d 438, 440 (Sth Cir. 1990), if it is frivolous', malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. §§ … deliberate indifference requires the prisoner to submit evidence that prison officials “refused to treat him, ignored his complaints, intentionally treated him incorrectly, or engaged in any similar conduct that would clearly
Cited 0 timesUnknownAddison v. Sedco Forex, U.S.A.
798 F. Supp. 1273 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Jul 27, 1992
The preemption provision is familiar territory for the federal courts and, as is oft noted, is “deliberately expansive, and designed to ‘establish pension plan regulation as exclusively a federal concern.’ ” Pilot Life Ins … Taylor (In re Goff), that ERISA “clearly was not intended to affect the operation of other federal law.” 706 F.2d 574 , 587 (5th Cir.1983).
Cited 4 timesPublishedBlueLinx Corporation v. Edwards
District Court, N.D. Texas · Jun 24, 2024
Co., 982 F.3d 280, 288 (5th Cir. 2020) (“A preliminary has clearly carried [its] burden of persuasion’” with respect to all four requirements.) (citation omitted). … Plaintiff, however, has not shown that its evidence qualifies as trade secrets under the DTSA.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · Dec 15, 2021
authority to establish vaccination requirements.” 86 Fed. … Although CMS acknowledges the effectiveness of natural immunity, it rejects natural immunity as a viable alternative to the CMS Mandate’s vaccination requirement.21 86 Fed. Reg. at 61,614.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRoberts v. Willow Distributors, Inc.
967 F. Supp. 904 · District Court, N.D. Texas · Jun 30, 1997
P. 8, 2 the court concludes that Willow has met its burden of showing that the work Roberts performed as a merchandiser qualifies him as an “outside salesman” and thus exempts him from the overtime provisions of the FLSA. … The court will assume, for purposes of this motion, that Roberts has established a prima facie case of discrimination.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · Mar 19, 2026
The burden is on the proponent of expert witness testimony to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the testimony is admissible. See Daubert, 509 U.S. at 592 n.10. … M.’s epilepsy and accompanying seizures “clearly constituted qualifying impairments that substantially limited major life activities” and “entitl[ed] him to protections under federal disability law” (ECF 52 at 8), and any
Cited 0 timesUnknownKirk v. Our Community Our Children
District Court, N.D. Texas · Aug 22, 2025
ACH has not carried its burden to show that the Fort Worth Division is a “clearly more convenient venue” than the Dallas Division. … “Title VII and [§] 1981 require the same proof to establish liability.” Shackelford v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP, 190 F.3d 398, 403 n.2 (5th Cir. 1999) (citing Bunch v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · Mar 23, 2021
Alternatively, the plaintiff can produce evidence to show that she was clearly better qualified than the person selected for the position. Churchill v. Texas Dept. of Crim. Justice, 539 F. … To establish a prima facie age discrimination case under the ADEA for wrongful termination, a plaintiff must show that: (1) she was discharged; (2) she was qualified for the position; (3) she was within the protected class
Cited 0 timesUnknownIndependent Financial Group LLC v. Harrison
District Court, N.D. Texas · Jun 6, 2025
These allegations clearly implicate USAllianz for its conduct upon affliating with Morrison. … The court concluded the defendants’ failure-to-supervise claim was arbitrable because it “clearly ‘arises in connection with the business’ of ONESCO[.]” Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMcGowan v. Southern Methodist University
District Court, N.D. Texas · Apr 11, 2023
The parties dispute whether these documents are protected by either attorney-client privilege or work-product immunity. … Thus, SMU has failed to meet its burden of establishing that the interviews are privileged.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHamer v. Central Office Administrative Remedy
District Court, N.D. Texas · Feb 4, 2021
1915(e)(2) provide for sua sponte dismissal of the complaint or any portion thereof, if it is frivolous, malicious, fails to state claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … Kyle, 65 F.3d 29, 31-32 (5th Cir. 1995) (noting that “it is difficult to see that any other deprivations in the prison context, short of those that clearly impinge on the duration of confinement, will hence- forth qualify
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna