Case law

Gregg County, Texas v. Douglas E. Farrar

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Nov 6, 1996

See City of Garland v. … ); see also Anderson v.

John Harris v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Feb 13, 2003

b) . . . is a felony of the third degree if it is shown in the trial of the offense that the offense was committed: in, on, or within 1000 feet of any real property that is owned, rented, or leased to a school or school board … See Curry v. State , 910 S.W.2d 490 , 496 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Garcia v. State , 887 S.W.2d 846, 861 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994); State v. West , 20 S.W.3d 867, 873 (Tex. App.--Dallas 2000, pet. ref'd); Sullivan v.

Myron Bishop Head v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 24, 2013

Brown v. State, 270 S.W.3d 564, 570 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Alejandro v. State, 493 S.W.2d 230, 231 (Tex. Crim. App. 1973); Watts v. State, 371 S.W.3d 448, 457 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2012, no pet.). … See Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475, 486 (1978); Pitts v. State, 916 S.W.2d 507, 510 (Tex. Crim.

Dustin Anthony Simmang v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Sep 11, 2013

V, XVI. … V. This clause protects against multiple punishments for “the same” offense. Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977); Ex parte Cavazos, 203 S.W.3d 333, 336 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

City of Austin, Jim Everett, Raymond Sanders and Freddie Maxwell v. Earl J. Gifford

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Feb 5, 1992

In Brady v. … See, e.g., Clanton v. Orleans Parish School Board , 649 F.2d 1084, 1098-99 (5th Cir. 1981); Harvey v.

the City of Austin, Chief Brian Manley, and the Austin Police Department v. Jane Doe

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 29, 2020

Hall v. … Butnaru v.

Nadeau Painting Specialist, Ltd. v. Dalcor Property Management, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 18, 2008

The evidence indicates that Nadeau sent an invoice to each property on roughly a weekly or biweekly basis through April 8, 2005. 1 The prices were $95.00 for “full paint-across the board (properties provide … Dalcor relies on Johnson v.

Charlie Flenteroy v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 17, 2003

is shown in the trial of the offense that the offense was committed: (1) in, on, or within 1000 feet of any real property that is owned, rented, or leased to a school or school board … See Square v. State, 167 S.W.2d 192, 193-94 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942); see also Zaragosa v. State, 588 S.W.2d 322, 323 n.3 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979); Hathorne v. State, 459 S.W.2d 826, 830 (Tex. Crim. App. 1970); Pitts v.

Horvatich v. TX DEPT. OF PROT. & REG. SER.

78 S.W.3d 594 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 16, 2002

Code Ann. § 161.206 (b) (1996); Holick v. Smith, 685 S.W.2d 18, 20 (Tex.1985). … On two different occasions, the Horvatiches had failed to meet the school bus; twice, the bus driver had to return to the school with G.H. on board. After this incident, Ms.

the City of Austin v. Noel Powell

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 13, 2022

Texas Dep’t of Parks and Wildlife v. Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217, 227 (Tex. 2004); see Bacon v. Texas Hist. Comm’n, 411 S.W.3d 161, 171 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013, no pet.); Hendee v. … (concluding that there was fact issue as to recklessness when circumstances included officer driving through intersection against red light at excessive rate of speed, with other traffic present, and city review board investigation

Benjamin Zieger v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 25, 2005

See Pharo v. Chambers County, 922 S.W.2d 945, 946 (Tex. 1996). Zieger had the burden of proving that probable injury occurred. See Branham v. Brown, 925 S.W.2d 365, 369 (Tex. App. … In Texas Department of Human Services v.

Pickett v. Texas Mutual Insurance Co.

239 S.W.3d 826 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 26, 2007

Board of Med. Examiners for Tex. v. Nzedu, 228 S.W.3d 264 (Tex.App.-Austin, 2007, no pet.); General Dynamics Corp. v. Sharp, 919 S.W.2d 861, 866 (Tex.App.-Austin 1996, writ denied); see also Southwestern Bell Tel. … Co. v. Moriel, 879 S.W.2d 10, 25 (Tex.1994) (citing Smith v. Stephenson, 641 S.W.2d 900, 902 (Tex.1982)).

Beacon Hill Staffing Group, LLC Cody Cox And Brannon Ross v. Kforce, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 20, 2015

(2 RR 83, 86, 98-99) In addition to utilizing multiple staffing agencies to fill job openings, companies often post their job openings on their company website, as well as public internet job boards such as Careerbuilder.com … See Sadler Clinic Ass'n, P.A. v. Hart, 403 S.W.3d 891, 899 (Tex. App. – Beaumont 2013, pet. denied); Wilson v. Chemco Chem. Co., 711 S.W.2d 265, 268 (Tex. App. – Dallas 1986, no pet.); Rimes v.

Brandon Perez, by and Through His Next Friend, Debra Perez, Individually and on Behalf of Similarly Situated Individuals v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Incorporated

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 18, 2003

Co. v. Watson, 876 S.W.2d 145, 148-49 (Tex. 1994); see also American Physicians Ins. Exch. v. … Garcia, 876 S.W.2d 842, 847 n.11 (Tex. 1994) (Article 21.21-2 is “subject to enforcement only by the State Board of Insurance.”).

Nathan Wayne Stark v. Mike Geeslin, Commissioner of Insurance, and Texas Department of Insurance

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 7, 2006

See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 (1972); Collins v. Texas Natural Res. Conservation Comm’n, 94 S.W.3d 876, 883 (Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no. pet.). … Compare Richardson v.

George Lueck v. State of Texas and Texas Department of Transportation

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 16, 2010

Id. at 227-28 ; County of Cameron v. Brown , 80 S.W.3d 549, 555 (Tex. 2002). … Ctr. v.

Barnes v. State

62 S.W.3d 288 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Nov 29, 2001

Jackson v. State, 898 S.W.2d 896, 898 (Tex.Crim.App.1995); Pitts v. State, 569 S.W.2d 898, 900 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Howard v. State, 966 S.W.2d 821, 824 (Tex.App.—Austin 1998, pet. ref'd); Pesina v. … Nevertheless, we do not know the effect an improper affirmative finding may have on appellant’s parole eligibility under the guidelines established by the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance Company/Zeferino Sanchez v. Zeferino Sanchez/Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 27, 2002

In Daniels v. … or issued for delivery in this state unless coverage is provided therein or supplemented thereto, in at least the limits described in the Texas Motor Vehicle Safety-Responsibility Act, under provisions prescribed by the Board

Pharmserv, Inc. v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission Office of the Inspector General of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission Kyle Janek, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 12, 2015

APPELLANT, V. …  Medicaid automatically precipitates concurrent exclusion from Titles V, and XX

Michael J. DeLitta v. Nancy Schaefer

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 16, 2015

V. COBB, 109 S.W.3d 877, 882 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2002, no pet.)...…….………15, 16 WALKER V. PACKER, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) ……………………..…..……..………….….…15 VALENZUELA V. … CODE is predicated on the statement, “The physician assistant board may take action under Section 204.302 against an applicant or license holder who: . . . ,” and then enumerates the prohibited conduct including the conduct