Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,255 results
1.10s
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 8, 2006
Without objection, Guajardo was qualified as an expert witness. … The use of a hatchet to cause death would establish that the perpetrator acted with intent to cause death.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 1, 2007
Section 101.053(b)(4) establishes the independently procured insurance exemption. … A law is void for vagueness if its prohibitions are not clearly defined. Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 108 (1972).
Cited 0 timesPublishedShakeel Mustafa v. Felix Rippy
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Oct 9, 2015
QUALITY AND COMPETENCE OF NEUTRALS All parties are entitled to competent, qualified Neutrals. … QUALITY AND COMPETENCE OF NEUTRALS All parties are entitled to competent, qualified Neutrals.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 15, 2000
The fact that the athletic department at TCU established practice and meeting times to be observed by those playing football does not establish that TCU had the right to direct and control all aspects of the players' activities … Waldrep clearly presented evidence that TCU exercised direction or control over some of his activities while a student at the university.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 1, 2007
Section 101.053(b)(4) establishes the independently procured insurance exemption. … A law is void for vagueness if its prohibitions are not clearly defined. Grayned v. City of Rockford , 408 U.S. 104, 108 (1972).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 16, 2015
The RA does not contain a map that clearly depicts the facility access control features. … A permanent site benchmark has been established inside the Registration boundary.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJames W. Paulsen v. State Bar of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 29, 2001
The Foundation is authorized to make grants only to qualified organizations, which must have section 501(c)(3) status under the Internal Revenue Code, and a primary purpose of providing legal services to individuals defined … He must establish first that the program is per se unethical.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Sep 17, 2008
Landon observed that the abuse-of-discretion standard is a review-limiting device, that, within limits, immunized from appellate revision the choice made by the trial court in a particular case. … The language in the Texas Constitution establishing the "County Commissioners Court" does not use an apostrophe in "Commissioners." See Tex. Const. art. V, § 18; 35 David B.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRaghunath Dass, P.E. v. Texas Board of Professional Engineers
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 6, 2015
Applies standard Sunset language to require TBPE to develop policies that clearly separate the policy-making responsibilities ofTBPE members and management responsibilities ofTBPE staff Sec. 1001.154. … Except 14 for an action involving fraud, conspiracy, or malice, a person 15 whose services are obtained by the board under this subsection is 16 immune from civil liability and may not be
Cited 0 timesPublishedNathaniel Pearson v. the State of Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 9, 2026
While counsel noted that he might have sought to qualify Dr. Cusser as an expert had counsel received a report before the hearing, he stated that he was not calling Dr. … Rather, the objecting party must “let the trial judge know what he wants, why he thinks he is entitled to it, and to do so clearly enough for the judge to understand him at a time when the judge is in the proper position
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jan 21, 2015
Recovery Agency is required to submit pictures to Redshift Investigation that clearly demonstrate damage ("Substantiating Pictures") in order for Attempted Recovery fee to be approved. 3.4. … In some cases weare able to get close f~ of$75.()0;.acceptance of.assignment will clearly adV:is.e either contingent. or close. fee $75;00 · g.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 30, 2000
When appellant spit out the cocaine, he clearly intended to abandon it, and appellant does not claim otherwise. The only issue is whether his decision to abandon the property was the result of police misconduct. … [I]f the State holds the burden of proof in this case, why did they ignore a test that would have established, conclusively established, guilt or innocence. I submit to you that is an important question.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Oct 5, 2018
If there is evidence establishing venue by a preponderance, we are not authorized to reverse the judgment on sufficiency of the evidence grounds. … Furthermore, even assuming arguendo that appellant was in custody when he met with Detective Elrod, the question remains whether the interview during which the detective requested a voluntary sample of appellant’s DNA qualified
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 17, 2019
the guilt of an actor” and “can be sufficient” on its own “to establish guilt.” … I don’t know why they’re giving him any immunity right now—but yeah.” 123. The Court finds credible Sgt.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Sep 30, 2004
In regards to one of these vehicles, Jerome was notified by the financing company in December 2003 that "newly enacted Texas Tax Code . . . provides that [certain] vehicles . . . may qualify for a property tax exemption." … A factual sufficiency challenge requires proof that the trial court's ruling was "so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and manifestly unjust."
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 24, 2013
See id. 702 (“[A] witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”). … We take Wooten’s argument to mean that had defense counsel been present, counsel could have clearly explained why he had the right to voir dire Betancourt under rule 705(b).
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Sep 17, 2013
The ultimate issue is whether “there is established in the mind of the juror such a conclusion as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant as would influence the juror in finding a verdict.” See Tex. Code Crim. … The trial court could have credited Wiest’s statement and thus determined that Wiest was qualified to sit on the jury. See id.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Sep 17, 2008
Thus, the Texas Constitution established the Commissioners Court as the county’s principal governing body. Commissioners Court of Titus County v. Agan, 940 S.W.2d 77, 79 (Tex. 1997). … Landon observed that the abuse-of-discretion standard is a review-limiting device, that, within limits, immunized from appellate revision the choice made by the trial court in a particular case.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Sep 30, 2004
In regards to one of these vehicles, Jerome was notified by the financing company in December 2003 that “newly enacted Texas Tax Code . . . provides that [certain] vehicles . . . may qualify for a property tax exemption … A factual sufficiency challenge requires proof that the trial court’s ruling was “so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and manifestly unjust.”
Cited 0 timesPublished566 S.W.3d 776 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Nov 21, 2018
evidence, both supporting and against the finding, and will set aside a finding only if it is so against the great weight and 7 preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly … The professional component of these procedures 15 may not be delegated to a technician and must be directly performed by a qualified licensee. 22 Tex. Admin.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna