Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstxctapp3

2,255 results

0.53s

  • Hanson v. State

    55 S.W.3d 681 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Oct 4, 2001

    Although he had- been granted use immunity, Kotaska refused to testify. The State then sought to introduce Kotaska’s earlier testimony from Ludwick’s trial. … to produce the result and the conduct of the actor clearly insufficient.”

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • Michael Nathan Kashan, Individually and D/B/A Sima Mail & Market and D/B/A Discount City USA and Discount City USA, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, D/B/A Sima Mail & Market v. McLane Company, Inc., a Texas Corporation

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 7, 2012

    Inc. , 10 S.W.3d 308, 314 (Tex. 2000) (holding that "a timely filed postjudgment motion that seeks a substantive change in an existing judgment qualifies as a motion to modify under Rule 329b(g), thus extending the trial … In this case, nothing in the record establishes that citation was served on the Secretary of State and forwarded to Kashan.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Michael Nathan Kashan, Individually and D/B/A Sima Mail & Market and D/B/A Discount City USA and Discount City USA, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, D/B/A Sima Mail & Market v. McLane Company, Inc., a Texas Corporation

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 7, 2012

    Inc., 10 S.W.3d 308, 314 (Tex. 2000) (holding that “a timely filed postjudgment motion that seeks a substantive change in an existing judgment qualifies as a motion to modify under Rule 329b(g), thus extending the trial … In this case, nothing in the record establishes that citation was served on the Secretary of State and forwarded to Kashan.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Linda S. Nowlin v. Lori Keaton

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 4, 2015

    Viewing the evidence in a neutral light, we cannot conclude that the jury’s finding that Keaton’s failure to pay on July 1 did not amount to a material breach of the lease was clearly wrong and manifestly unjust. … “A judge’s ordinary efforts at courtroom administration—even a stern and short-tempered judge’s ordinary efforts at courtroom administration—remain immune.” Liteky, 510 U.S. at 556.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edward Fultz v. State

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 16, 2005

    The prosecutor then qualified his definition by providing two examples of a “serious” offense: driving while intoxicated, which in fact is a class B misdemeanor, see Tex. Pen. … The trial court’s ruling was not clearly erroneous. See id. 6 On appeal, the State argues that the prosecutor intended “serious” to mean “an offense that was worse than a Class C misdemeanor.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Danny Ray Cline v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Alan Polunsky, and Wayne Scott

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 14, 2006

    Cline argues that article 6181-1, section 4, as it read in 1986, was made part of his sentence and created a protected liberty interest in his earned GCT by its use of "explicitly mandatory language" and establishment of … Although the 1986 statutes used mandatory language in describing the rate at which inmates accrue GCT, depending on their classification, they also clearly provided that credits could be lost and that restoration of lost

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Danny Ray Cline v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Alan Polunsky, and Wayne Scott

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 14, 2006

    Cline argues that article 6181-1, section 4, as it read in 1986, was made part of his sentence and created a protected liberty interest in his earned GCT by its use of “explicitly mandatory language” and establishment of … Although the 1986 statutes used mandatory language in describing the rate at which inmates accrue GCT, depending on their classification, they also clearly provided that credits could be lost and that restoration of lost

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edward Fultz v. State

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Dec 16, 2005

    The prosecutor then qualified his definition by providing two examples of a "serious" offense: driving while intoxicated, which in fact is a class B misdemeanor, see Tex. Pen. … The trial court's ruling was not clearly erroneous. See id . The judgment of conviction is affirmed. __________________________________________Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Justices B. A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cynthia J. Lee v. Timothy M. Novak

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 19, 2001

    .; (2) Lee had the right to establish A.M.N.' … of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction about the allegations sought to be established.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • in the Matter of J. W. A.

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Oct 13, 2005

    Furthermore, expressions of impatience, dissatisfaction, annoyance, and even anger do not establish bias or partiality. Francis, 46 S.W.3d at 240. … The threat to counsel was clearly ill-advised and inappropriate.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • in the Matter of J. W. A.

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Oct 13, 2005

    Furthermore, expressions of impatience, dissatisfaction, annoyance, and even anger do not establish bias or partiality. Francis , 46 S.W.3d at 240 . … "A judge's ordinary efforts at courtroom administration--even a stern and short-tempered judge's ordinary efforts at courtroom administration--remain immune." Id . (quoting Liteky , 510 U.S. at 555-56 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Austin v. City of Cedar Park And Wilson Land and Cattle Company

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 14, 1997

    The Code also establishes procedures to be followed when an existing municipality's ETJ is reduced or expanded. … In sum, Austin and Cedar Park are, as a practical matter, the only cities that could qualify to use section 42.024. 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Larry F. York// Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation and Greg Abbott, Attorney General for the State of Texas v. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation And Greg Abbott, Attorney General for the State of Texas// Cross- Larry F. York

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 8, 2013

    But subchapter C of the PIA qualifies the public’s right of access to certain types of “public information.” See id. §§ 552.101–.153. … As for the third, letter ruling 2011-09372, it is clearly distinguishable from the situation here.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Abbott v. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation

    212 S.W.3d 648 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 30, 2006

    The Public Information Act Compels Disclosure of the Information Requested The Public Information Act Qualifies Under Section 161.512(a) In support of its assertion that the Public Information Act does not qualify under section … The sixth exception exempts from disclosure “personnel and medical files and similar files 8 the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.”

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • in Re Pisces Foods, L.L.C. D/B/A Wendy's Restaurants and/or D/B/A Wendy's Old Fashioned Hamburgers Restaurant

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 24, 2007

    A party seeking arbitration must establish its right to arbitration under a contract. Weekley Homes, Inc. v. Jennings , 936 S.W.2d 16, 18 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, writ denied) ( Weekley I). … Here, the parties agreed to conditions precedent before arbitration can take place and, by placing those conditions in the contract, the parties clearly intended to make arbitration a dispute resolution mechanism of last

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas v. Entertainment Publications, Inc.

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 12, 2009

    In addition, the Comptroller's plea urged that Entertainment's request for declaratory relief under the UDJA is barred by sovereign immunity because she was acting within her discretionary authority in applying section 151.024 … A court, on finding an agency rule invalid, may remand the rule to the agency to allow "reasonable time for the agency to either revise or readopt the rule through the established procedures."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grubbs Nissan Mid-Cities, Ltd. v. Nissan North America, Inc. Brett Bray, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation And Don Davis Nissan Grapevine, Inc.

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · May 24, 2007

    A party seeking arbitration must establish its right to arbitration under a contract. Weekley Homes, Inc. v. Jennings, 936 S.W.2d 16, 18 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, writ denied) (Weekley I). … Here, the parties agreed to conditions precedent before arbitration can take place and, by placing those conditions in the contract, the parties clearly intended to make arbitration a dispute resolution mechanism

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Ellis

    279 S.W.3d 1 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Mar 17, 2009

    Co., 118 U.S. 394 , 6 S.Ct. 1132 , 30 L.Ed. 118 (1886) (Privileges and Immunities clause extends to corporations). … Ellis and Colyandro also complain that the election code permits corporations to finance the establishment and administration of general-purpose political committees, but it does not define “establishment” or “administration

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Eric Matthew Castle v. State

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Aug 25, 2010

    However, if the person speaking to Kyle was in fact Castle, then what Castle had allegedly said to Kyle would be an admission by a party opponent and would not qualify as hearsay. See Tex. R. Evid. 801(e)(2). … App. 1979) (“In admitting the contents of a telephone conversation, the identity of the speaker is sufficiently established if the message reveals that the speaker has knowledge of facts that only the speaker would be

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas v. Entertainment Publications, Inc.

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jun 12, 2009

    In addition, the Comptroller’s plea urged that Entertainment’s request for declaratory relief under the UDJA is barred by sovereign immunity because she was acting within her discretionary authority in applying section … A court, on finding an agency rule invalid, may remand the rule to the agency to allow “reasonable time for the agency to either revise or readopt the rule through the established procedures.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.