Case law

Brown v. Board of Education

47 F. Supp. 3d 665 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 15, 2014

Doe v. Catholic Bishop for Diocese of Memphis, 306 S.W.3d 712, 717 (Tenn.Ct.App.2008); see also Brown v. … Section 49-5-512 provides that “ ‘impartial’ means that the selected hearing officer shall have no history of employment with the board or director of schools, no relationship with any board member and no relationship with

Orlowski v. Bates

146 F. Supp. 3d 908 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 18, 2015

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir.1989). III. … Lopez v. Taylor, 195 S.W.3d 627, 634 (Tenn.Ct.App.2005), (citing Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62, 66 (Tenn.2001)).

Boyd v. James S. Hayes Living Health Care Agency, Inc.

671 F. Supp. 1155 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 13, 1987

Hayes’ in-corporators were MCH’s board chairman and corporate counsel. The MHC board selected the Hayes board, and MHC officials served on the Hayes board. MHC’s executive director was chairman of the board of Hayes. … The MHC board selects the Hayes board. The Hayes board chairman was the executive director of MHC.

Gomez v. City of Memphis, Tennessee

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Apr 20, 2020

In re Knoxville News-Sentinel Co., Inc., 723 F.2d 470, 474 (6th Cir. 1983) (citing Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978)); see also Shane Grp., Inc. v. … (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir. 1983)) (internal quotation marks omitted)).

Rienholtz v. Campbell

64 F. Supp. 2d 721 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 28, 1999

See also Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987). … Rimmer-Bey v. Brown, 62 F.3d 789, 790-91 (6th Cir.1995).

Brown v. Carpenter

889 F. Supp. 1028 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 9, 1995

Plaintiff, Ricky Flamingo Brown, an inmate at the West Tennessee High Security Facility (WTHSF) in Henning, Tennessee, has filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . … See Cleavinger v. Saxner, 474 U.S. 193 , 106 S.Ct. 496 , 88 L.Ed.2d 507 (1985) (disciplinary board mem bers protected by qualified immunity); Superintendent v.

Brown v. Raymond Corp.

318 F. Supp. 2d 591 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 4, 2004

In Jackson v. … Dec. 18, 2003); Brown v. Crown Equip. Corp., 2004 WL 350658 , at *1-2, *6-7 (Tenn.Ct.App.

Emrit v. Combs

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 9, 2025

Corp. v. Smith, 802 F. App’x 938, 945 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)). But this “lenient treatment . . . has limits.” Pilgrim v. … (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989))). Pro se plaintiffs must still plead enough “factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Barnett v.

Brown v. City of Memphis

440 F. Supp. 2d 868 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jul 7, 2006

Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County, Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. at 407 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 .

Brown v. Hosto & Buchan, PLLC

748 F. Supp. 2d 847 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 2, 2010

Jeter v. … See Watson v.

Brown v. Federal Express Corp.

62 F. Supp. 3d 681 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 28, 2014

Kovach v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., 587 F.3d 323, 328 (6th Cir.2009) (quoting Glenn v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 461 F.3d 660, 666 (6th Cir.2006)). … Plaintiff cites Elliott v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Brown v. City of Memphis

921 F. Supp. 2d 865 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Feb 5, 2013

Sease placed Brown and Biles in the back of his patrol car and took $400 from Brown’s pocket and $800 from Bile’s pocket. … Id. at 700-01 (quoting Brown v. Shaner, 172 F.3d 927, 931 (6th Cir.1999)).

Scarborough v. Brown Group, Inc.

935 F. Supp. 954 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 25, 1996

Morgan v. Church’s Fried Chicken, 829 F.2d 10, 12 (6th Cir.1987). Title VII Claims Against Brown Group, Inc. … law tort claims against Brown Group, Inc., are hereby DISMISSED.

Howard v. Fox

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Aug 29, 2025

(citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). Pro se plaintiffs must still plead enough “factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Barnett v. … Brown v. Lewis, 779 F.3d 401, 418 (6th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Burgess v. Fischer, 735 F.3d 462, 472 (6th Cir. 2013)).

Board of Education v. Memphis City Board of Education

911 F. Supp. 2d 631 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 27, 2012

v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165 (6th Cir.1983); see al'so Magaw, 132 F.3d *648 at 290 . The claims arise in a concrete factual context and concern a dispute that has already arisen.

Shakespeare v. MetLife Legal Plans, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jul 22, 2025

(citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989))). Pro se plaintiffs must still plead enough “factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Barnett v. … See Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F.

Scarborough v. Brown Group, Inc.

972 F. Supp. 1112 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 11, 1997

In support of this argument, Brown Group relies upon Willis v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 948 F.2d 305 (6th Cir.1991), and Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 78 F.3d 875 (4th Cir.1996). … In Harris v.

Greene v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

72 F. Supp. 2d 882 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 15, 1999

See Bowman v. … See Ray by Holman v.

Bosan v. University Place Senior Living SE LP

District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 8, 2025

(citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989))). Pro se litigants must still plead enough “factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Barnett v. … See Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F.

Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

976 F. Supp. 729 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 9, 1997

Restatement, supra, § 390; see Woodson v. Porter Brown Limestone Co., 916 S.W.2d 896, 907 (Tenn.1996). … The rule in Brown v. Harkleroad, 39 Tenn.App. 657 , 287 S.W.2d 92 (1956), limiting negligent entrustment suits to situations involving some sort of bailment, has been fiercely criticized. In Nichols v.