Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,953 results
1.37s
Rainey Bros. Construction Co. v. Memphis & Shelby County Board of Adjustment
967 F. Supp. 998 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 18, 1997
the Board’s decision. … Dyer v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBrown, Jr. v. Shelby County Jail
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 16, 2021
Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. … .”); see also Brown v. R.I., 511 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrown v. Madison County Sheriff's Department
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 7, 2020
Brown is assessed his first strike under § 1915(g). This strike shall take effect when judgment is entered. See Coleman v. Tollefson, 135 S. Ct. 1759, 1763-64 (2015). … See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), partially overruled on other grounds by LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrown v. Madison County Sheriff's Department
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Nov 6, 2019
Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013); see also Brown v. R.I., 511 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHooks Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC
775 F. Supp. 2d 1029 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Apr 5, 2011
(citations omitted); V & S ProGalv, Inc. v. … Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Madison County Sheriff's Department
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 3, 2019
Only Plaintiff Brown and three others complied. … Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 605 (6th Cir. 1997), partially overruled on other grounds by LaFountain v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTurner v. Merit System Protection Board
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 28, 2021
The Report recommends granting Defendant Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) and Secretary of Labor Martin J. Walsh’s Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 25). … See Hood v. Brennan, No. 15-1937, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 21166, at *6 (6th Cir. Feb. 3, 2017) (“The Postmaster General is the proper defendant in an employment discrimination action against the USPS.”).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrown v. Hanover American Insurance Company, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jul 14, 2021
Brown v. City of Memphis, 440 F.Supp.2d 868, 872 (W.D. Tenn. 2006). … Boyle v. United States, 556 U.S. 938, 944 (2009) (citing United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 580, 583 (1985)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown108 F. Supp. 2d 960 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 27, 2000
See also Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369 , 107 S.Ct. 2415 , 96 L.Ed.2d 303 (1987). … Rimmer-Bey v. Brown, 62 F.3d 789, 790-91 (6th Cir.1995).
Cited 45 timesPublishedCastleberry v. Collierville Medical Associates Inc.
92 F.R.D. 492 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 16, 1981
Brown and Dr. Jack Halford. … Rogers v. Girard Trust Co., 159 F.2d 239 (6th Cir. 1946).
Cited 8 timesPublishedBrown v. State of Tennessee Human Resources
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 25, 2019
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION TAMARA BROWN … (Id. at PageID 18) (citing Welch v. Texas Dep't of Highways & Pub. Transp., 483 U.S. 468, 472 (1987); Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 100 (1989)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBrown v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Sep 2, 2020
Group, LLC v. Hyalogic, LLC, 712 F.3d 305, 309 (6th Cir. 2013) (quoting Bamerilease Capital Corp. v. Nearburg, 958 F.2d 150, 152 (6th Cir. 1992)). … Stauback v. Retail Servs.-Southeast, LLC v. H. G. Hill Realty Co., 160 S.W.3d 521, 524 (Tenn. 2005) (internal quotations omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownEmbassy Pictures Corporation v. Hudson
242 F. Supp. 975 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jul 9, 1965
BAILEY BROWN, District Judge. … In the earlier cases of Roth v. United States, and Alberts v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWilliams v. Express Airlines I, Inc.
825 F. Supp. 831 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Apr 9, 1993
Co. v. … Brown v. SCOA Industries, Inc., 741 S.W.2d 916, 919-920 (Tenn.App.1987).
Cited 28 timesPublishedAkines v. SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT
512 F. Supp. 2d 1138 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jul 5, 2007
Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County, Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 , 117 S.Ct. 1382, 1388 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (citing Monell, 436 U.S. at 694 , 98 S.Ct. at 2027 ); Pembaur v. … See Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. at 1388 ; Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 166 , 113 S.Ct. 1160, 1162 , 122 L.Ed.2d 517 (1993); Collins v.
Cited 10 timesPublished241 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Apr 12, 1965
BAILEY BROWN, District Judge. This is a petition under 26 U.S.C. §§ 7402 and 7604 to compel testimony and the production of documents before an Internal Revenue agent. … Although there is authority that state law should govern (Baird v. Koerner, 279 F.2d 623 (C.A. 9)), Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633 (C.A.2) holds that federal law governs and this is the better reasoned opinion.
Cited 14 timesPublishedEqual Employment Opportunity Commission v. McLean Trucking Co.
64 F.R.D. 643 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jan 18, 1974
road, board and back pay. … Dewey v.
Cited 0 timesPublished325 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Apr 29, 1971
OPINION AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT BAILEY BROWN, Chief Judge. Plaintiff, John W. Spence, brings this action as father and next friend of John W. Spence, Jr., (hereinafter John) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . … Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 L.Ed.2d 965 (1963). We find and conclude that the defendants’ action did infringe on John’s right of free exercise of religion.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWeatherholt v. Crockett County School Board
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Jun 27, 2024
See Ashcroft v. … Kingsley v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown336 F. Supp. 432 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 11, 1971
*433 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION BAILEY BROWN, Chief Judge. … The control exercised by the parent by virtue of its stock holding is exercised in the usual way by the election of the subsidiary’s board and officers. The affairs of the two are generally handled separately.
Cited 20 timesPublished
Ask Donna