Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstnmd

2,304 results

1.50s

  • Tucker v. Callahan

    663 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 26, 1987

    Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984). … Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984). Accord, Gregory v. Drury, 809 F.2d 249 (5th Cir.1987) petition for cert. filed, 55 U.S.L.W. 3762 (U.S.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ingram

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 3, 2026

    Snyder v. … Whiting v. City of Athens, 170 F.4th 439, 447 (6th Cir. 2026) (citing Unarco Material Handling, Inc. v. Liberato, 317 S.W.3d 227, 238 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010); Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Charter House, Inc. v. First Tennessee Bank, N.A.

    693 F. Supp. 593 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 4, 1988

    (TAMA) v. … Kelly for violation of Rule G-19 of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the “MSRB”).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Grise v. Stewart County School System

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 19, 2021

    See Horen v. Bd. of Educ. of Toledo City School Dist., 568 F. Supp. 2d 850, 853 (N.D. Ohio 2008); Molina v. Board of Educ. of School Distr. For City of Detroit, No. 07-10948, 2007 WL 4454928 at *2 (E.D. Mich. … defined by existing rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law....’ ” Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 (1985) (quoting Board of Regents v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lineberry v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

    885 F. Supp. 1095 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 4, 1995

    See New York Times Co. v. … Co. v. Brown, 782 F.Supp. 110, 112 (M.D.Ga.1992). Plaintiff in that ease was potentially subject to liability for assault and battery.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • MarketGraphics Research Group, Inc. v. Berge

    245 F. Supp. 3d 973 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 24, 2017

    Sorah v. … BAP 2007) (citing Johnson v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Long v. Dutton

    621 F. Supp. 1209 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 12, 1985

    Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025 , -, 104 S.Ct. 2885, 2892 , 81 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984).” Brown v. Davis, supra, 752 F.2d at 1147 [3, 4]. … . * * * ” Brown v. Davis, supra, 752 F.2d at 1145-1146 . This is equally true, if not more so, of earwitness-identification. Under the charges in the indictments against Mr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Montgomery

    136 B.R. 727 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 13, 1992

    In re Royal Golf Products, 908 F.2d 91 (6th Cir. 1990); Brown v. First Nat'l Bank of Little Rock, 748 F.2d 490 n. 6 (8th Cir.1984); In re Bohlen Enterprises, Ltd., 859 F.2d 561 (8th Cir.1989). … Brown v. First Nat'l Bank of Little Rock, 748 F.2d 490 n. 6 (8th Cir. 1984); "[t]he existence of this control determines whether the payments were preferential transfers...." Smyth v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Boyd v. Jakes

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 15, 2025

    Brown, 891 F. 2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). The Court is not required to create a claim for a plaintiff. Clark v. Nat’l Travelers Life. Ins. Co., 518 F. 2d 1167, 1169 (6th Cir. 1975); see also Brown v. … v. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 492 U.S. 229, 237 (1989); see also Brown v. Cassens Transp. Co., 546 F.3d 347, 354 (6th Cir. 2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Federal Express Corp. v. Tennessee Public Service Commission

    693 F. Supp. 598 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 17, 1988

    In Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983), a state statute 20 required an employee’s vacation trust to pay withholding taxes to the state. … The tax board’s second cause of action was more difficult to characterize. Preemption was a necessary ingredient to the tax board’s claims under the California Declaratory Judgment Act.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Delk v. Bumphus

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 11, 2019

    Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 612, 613 (6th Cir. … Delk fails to state a claim against Defendant Brown. “[T]here is no constitutionally protected due process right to unfettered access to prison grievance procedures.” Walker v. Michigan Dep’t of Corr., 128 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gaines v. Excel Industries, Inc.

    667 F. Supp. 569 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 20, 1987

    See Latham v. … The subsidiary’s board of directors is composed entirely of persons who also are members of Industries’ board. Both parent and subsidiary are covered by the same workers compensation and general liability insurer.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Middlebrooks v. Helton

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 21, 2023

    Gonzalez v. National Board of Medical Examiners, 225 F. 3d 620, 625 (6th Cir. 2000). "Pro se litigants have the right to be heard in federal courts and represent themselves. … Greene v. Frost Brown Todd, LLC, 856 F. 3d 438, 439 (6th Cir. 2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Grider v. Monin

    637 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 10, 1986

    In Ross v. … Quinn, 739 F.2d at 645 (citing Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees, 607 F.2d 705 , 708 & n. 4 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982); Shimman v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bonee v. L & M Construction Chemicals

    518 F. Supp. 375 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 23, 1981

    Auglaize Box Board Co. v. Hinton, 100 Ohio St. 505 , 126 N.E. 881 (1919). Two Ohio appellate court decisions have used the Auglaize look-through-form-to-substance rule to protect the rights of third parties. … In Ray v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Gracey General Partnership v. City of Clarksville, Tennessee

    District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 10, 2025

    After public comment, as well as comments from Willoughby, her husband, and members of the Board, the Board voted unanimously to reject the application for demolition. (Doc. No. 13-1 at 3–4.) … King v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • G.C. ex rel. Johnson v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, LLC

    829 F. Supp. 2d 609 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 19, 2011

    The defendants cite Borner v. … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); Brown v. United States, 583 F.3d 916, 919 (6th Cir.2009) . The parties do not indicate the size of the pesticide tubes. .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Carr

    179 F. Supp. 824 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 21, 1959

    Named as defendants in the action are the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Co-ordinator of Elections, and the Members of the State Board of Elections. … Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 , 66 S.Ct. 1198 , 90 L.Ed. 1432 ; Cook v. Fortson and Turman v. Duckworth, 329 U.S. 675 , 67 S.Ct. 21 , 91 L.Ed. 596 ; Colegrove v. Barrett, 330 U.

    Reversed by Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Brooks v. Briley

    274 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 9, 1967

    Rap Brown; Aaron Neal, Jr., a Negro citizen, and a student at Tennessee State University; James E. … Brown, Director of Law of the City of Nashville; Thomas Shriver, the District Attorney General for the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Tennessee; and R. C.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • McLemore v. Third National Bank in Nashville

    136 B.R. 727 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 13, 1992

    In re Royal Golf Products, 908 F.2d 91 (6th Cir.1990); Brown v. … Brown v. First Nat’l Bank of Little Rock, 748 F.2d 490 n. 6 (8th Cir.1984); “[t]he existence of this control determines whether the payments were preferential transfers.... ” Smyth v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.