Case law

Thompson v. Davidson Transit Organization

563 F. Supp. 2d 820 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 25, 2008

(Docket No. 50, Ex. 12 at p. 3) DTO is run by a separate board of directors. Most members of the DTO board, including Mr. Sanderson, Mr. Oli-phant, and Mr. … Shah v.

Simmons v. Bomar

224 F. Supp. 633 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 7, 1964

The rule which is applicable here was first stated in Brown v. … The Court cited Brown v.

Larson v. City of Algood

390 F. Supp. 3d 874 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 3, 2019

Chilingirian v. Boris , 882 F.2d 200 , 205 (6th Cir. 1989) (citing *888 Board of Regents v. Roth , 408 U.S. 564 , 573, 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) ). … Quinn v. Shirey , 293 F.3d 315 , 320 (6th Cir. 2002) Brown , 214 F.3d at 723 . As a consequence, a plaintiff must show that he or she requested a name-clearing hearing and the same was denied. Id. ; see also, Helm v.

Stanfield v. Horn

704 F. Supp. 1486 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 18, 1988

Horn, Administrator of the Board of Law Examiners of Tennessee; Charles W. Bur-son, President of the Board of Law Examiners of Tennessee; Lowry F. Kline, Vice-President of the Board of Law Examiners of Tennessee; and H. … See e.g., Pollack v. Aspbury, 14 F.R.D. 454 (S.D.N.Y.1953). See generally Wright § 1382, supra, n. 10, 18.

United States v. Darden

346 F. Supp. 3d 1096 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 2, 2018

United States v. Brown , 332 F.3d 363 , 373 (6th Cir. 2003). … Brown , 332 F.3d at 374 .

Averett v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.

306 F. Supp. 3d 1005 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 24, 2018

See TRW Inc. v. … CMS' statement precludes severance and affirmance of the portion of the rule establishing board certification as the sole path to a "primary specialty designation." See Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v.

Stanfield v. Horn

704 F. Supp. 1487 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 9, 1989

Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 485 , 103 S.Ct. 1303, 1316 , 75 L.Ed. 2d 206 (1983) (quoting Doe v. Pringle, 550 F.2d 596, 597 (10th Cir.1976). … Razatos v. Colorado Supreme Court, 746 F.2d 1429 (10th Cir.1984) cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1016 , 105 S.Ct. 2019 , 85 L.Ed.2d 301 (1985). Nordgren v. Hafter, 789 F.2d 334 (5th Cir.1986).

Gaines v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

746 F. Supp. 738 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 20, 1990

See NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85 , 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984) (holding NCAA’s television restrictions violated § 1 of the Sherman Act). … NCAA v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Olka., 468 U.S. 85, 101-02 , 104 S.Ct. 2948, 2960-61 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70, 84 (1984).

Burns v. Robertson County

192 F. Supp. 3d 909 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 13, 2016

Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Perez, 466 -F.3d at 430-31 (quoting Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. at 410 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 )).

Griffin v. Medtronic, Inc.

312 F. Supp. 3d 682 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 14, 2018

Defendants rely on Brown v. Crown Equip. Corp. , 181 S.W.3d 268 , 282 (Tenn. 2005) for the proposition that "[t]he plaintiff ... must trace his or her injury to the defect," and on King v. … Jackson v. Ford Motor Co. , 842 F.3d 902 , 909-10 (6th Cir. 2016). Defendants also rely on Haynes v.

Raines v. Lack

714 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 20, 1989

See Connecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat, 452 U.S. 458, 464 , 101 S.Ct. 2460, 2464 , 69 L.Ed.2d 158 (1981). Thus, courts generally defer to the judgment of prison administrators on this core matter. … Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d at 1388 .

Z.J. v. Vanderbilt Univ.

355 F. Supp. 3d 646 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 19, 2018

Brown v. Christian Bros. Univ. , 428 S.W.3d 38 , 50 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013) (citing Quality Auto Parts Co. v. Bluff City Buick Co. , 876 S.W.2d 818 , 821 (Tenn. 1994) ). … It is well-settled that consideration exists when "the promisee does something that it is under no legal obligation to do," Brown Oil Co. v.

Cunningham v. Hoffman

420 F. Supp. 325 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 22, 1976

Hutcheson v. … E. g., Appelwick v. Hoffman, 540 F.2d 404 (8th Cir. 1976); Sofranko v. Froehlke, 346 F.Supp. 1380 (W.D.Tex.1972). .

Haymer v. Minor

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jul 7, 2022

Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989), nor can the Court “create a claim which [a plaintiff] has not spelled out in his pleading.” Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Clark v. … Gardner v. Morriss, No. 3:17- cv-00747, 2017 WL 4805205, at *2 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 24, 2017) (citing Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486–87 (1994)); see Sykes v.

Heinold Commodities & Securities, Inc. v. Hunt (In Re Hunt)

30 B.R. 425 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 9, 1983

See Tepsco Tennessee Pipe & Supply Corp. v. Selby, slip op. at 4. See also, Household Finance Corp. v. Danns, 558 F.2d 114 , 116 (2d Cir.1977); Public Finance Corp. v. Taylor, 514 F.2d 1370 (9th Cir. 1975); Brown v. … See also, Neal v. Clark, 95 U.S. 704 , 24 L.Ed. 586 (1878); Brown v. Buchanan, 419 F.Supp. at 201 ; Tepsco Tennessee Pipe & Supply Corp. v. Selby, slip op. at 4; United American Bank v. Parker, 5 Bankr.Ct.Dec.

LensCrafters, Inc. v. Sundquist

184 F. Supp. 2d 753 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 8, 2002

The defendants do not assert Eleventh Amendment immunity with regard to the members of the Board and concede that they are proper defendants. With regard to Governor Sundquist, the plaintiffs rely on Lawson v. … In Allinder v.

Capitol Airways, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n

223 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jan 20, 1961

of Directors, Executive Board or Executive Committee. … Conductors of America v. Pitney, 326 U.S. 561 , 66 S.Ct. 322 , 90 L.Ed. 318 , and Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R.

Moncier v. Jones

939 F. Supp. 2d 854 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 10, 2013

Jones, chief disciplinary counsel of the Board of Professional Responsibility. Plaintiffs claims arise out of his disciplinary proceeding before a hearing panel of the Board of Professional Responsibility. … Will v.

Jackson v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.

131 F. Supp. 3d 756 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 17, 2015

Woods v. … A (5/7/12 Ltr. from Brown to EEOC investigator).)

Hughes v. Duncan

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 20, 2022

Browning v. Levy, 283 F.3d 761, 775 (6th Cir.2002). … This immunity extends to parole boards and its members who fail to set or schedule a timely parole hearing. Fort v. Washington, 41 F.4th 1141, 1146 (9th Cir. 2022); Thompson, 882 F.2d at 1184; Cox v.