Case law

Brown v. Board of Commissioners of the City of Chattanooga

722 F. Supp. 380 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 8, 1989

Brown, the black candidate, received 78.8% of the black vote. … Hudson; 1971 Hargraves v. Meyer v. O’Rear v. Parks; 1975 Cash v. Meacham; 1979 Brown v. Cox; 1982 McClarty v. Taylor v. Timberlake. 12 .

Cousin v. McWherter

904 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 28, 1995

In addition, the Court takes judicial notice of racially polarized voting in Hamilton *700 County as set in the following charts which are Appendixes A, B, and C to Brown v. … Brown v. Board of Commissioners of Chattanooga, Tenn., 722 F.Supp. 380, 386 (E.D.Tenn.1989). In 1889 the general assembly enacted a series of laws designed to disfranchise blacks. Brown, supra at 386 .

Scott v. Forgey

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 10, 2022

Hawks v. Jones, 105 F. Supp. 2d 718, 722 (E.D. Mich. 2000) (first citing Whittington v. Milby, 928 F.2d 188, 193 (6th Cir. 1991); then citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591 (6th Cir. 1989)). … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla., v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997).

Taylor v. Brown

461 F. Supp. 559 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 27, 1978

See Buckles v. Morristown Kayo Co., 132 F.Supp. 555 (E.D. Tenn.1955); United States v. Ozark Air Lines, Inc., 419 F.Supp. 795 (E.D.Mo.1976). … United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, supra, at 726-27, 86 S.Ct. 1130 .

Brown v. Exactech, Inc.

376 F. Supp. 3d 811 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 26, 2019

D.S. v. Grainger Cty. , 819 F.3d 834 , 847 (6th Cir. 2016). … Id. ; see also Albertson v. T.J.

Taylor v. Brown

467 F. Supp. 762 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 29, 1978

Brennan v. Ray Stern Investment Corp., 375 F.Supp. 705 (N.D.Texas 1974) (holding that daily active management via telephone by an out-of-state owner brings apartment building employees within the protection of the Act). … See Houchin v. Thompson, 438 F.2d 927 (6th Cir. 1970); See also Tullis v. Shavin, 332 F.2d 616 aff’g. 230 F.Supp. 52 (E.D.Tenn.1963), and Lenca v. Laran Enterprises, 388 F.Supp. 782 (N.D.Ill.1974).

Brown v. Rose

378 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 18, 1973

. * * * Thompson v. … Darr v. Burford (1950), 339 U.S. 200, 204 , 70 S.Ct. 587, 590 , 94 L.Ed. 761 .

Brown v. Rose

362 F. Supp. 1003 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 18, 1973

. * * * Thompson v. Tahash, D.C.Minn. (1968), 286 F.Supp. 663, 665 [3]. … Darr v. Burford (1950), 339 U.S. 200, 204 , 70 S.Ct. 587, 590 , 94 L.Ed. 761 .

Brown v. Kingsport Publishing Corp.

321 F. Supp. 1352 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 22, 1971

Dobyns-Taylor Hardware Co. v. … . * * * ” Kelly v.

Brown v. Knoxville News-Sentinel

41 F.R.D. 283 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 10, 1966

In Passic v. … Our Court of Appeals in Collier et al. v.

Womack v. Brown-Forman Corp.

897 F. Supp. 2d 646 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 25, 2012

Seeger, 681 F.3d at 283 (quoting Dixon v. Gonzales, 481 F.3d 324, 333 (6th Cir.2007)); see also EEOC v. … Grace v. USGAR, 521 F.3d 655, 677 (6th Cir.2008); Warfield v. Lebanon Corr. Inst., 181 F.3d 723, 729 (6th Cir.1999).

Brown v. Sun Healthcare Group, Inc.

476 F. Supp. 2d 848 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 21, 2007

Brown suffered injury because of a failure on the part of the staff of Voss to properly position Mr. Brown, and that Mr. … V.

Buda v. Saxbe

406 F. Supp. 399 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 6, 1975

No defendant moved for a dismissal for want of jurisdiction in this Court; but, as it is obliged to do, Williams v. W. R. … This contention lacks merit. *402 The plaintiffs rely heavily upon two decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit: Ely v. Velde (Ely I), C.A. 4th (1971), 451 F.2d 1130 , and Ely v.

Mapp v. Board of Education

329 F. Supp. 1374 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 26, 1971

Pursuant to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), this lawsuit was instituted. … The City of Chattanooga can never expect to remain an island within the Nation living in the pre-Brown v. Board of Education era, when the rest of the Nation is moving into the post-Brown v. Board of Education era.

Brown v. McKinnon Bridge Co., Inc.

732 F. Supp. 1479 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 6, 1989

Brown.] … The claimant must have been on board primarily to aid in navigation. 649 F.2d at 443 . See also Searcy v. E.T. Slider, Inc., 679 F.2d 614 (6th Cir.1982).

Shirley v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Co.

608 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 19, 1984

See, e.g., Hill v. Spiegel, 708 F.2d 233 (6th Cir.1983); Dean v. American Security Insurance Co., 559 F.2d 1036, 1038 (3rd Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1066 , 98 S.Ct. 1243 , 55 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978). … United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 -950 (6th Cir.1981).

Goss v. Board of Education

270 F. Supp. 903 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 7, 1967

An order was entered on that date by the Court directing the School Board to submit on or before April 8,1960 a plan to bring about a good faith compliance with the decision in Brown v. Board of Education, supra. … Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, Va., 345 F.2d 310 (C.A. 4); Wheeler v. Durham City Board of Education, 346 F.2d 768 (C.A. 4); Goss v.

Brown v. American Enka Corp.

452 F. Supp. 154 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 7, 1976

Heard v. Mueller Company, C.A. 6th (1972), 464 F.2d 190, 193 . … Terrell v. Feldstein Company, Inc., C.A. 5th (1972), 468 F.2d 910, 911 [1].

Goss v. Board of Education

320 F. Supp. 549 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 1, 1970

After the mandate in Brown v. … The Brown mandate, supra, as applied by this Court in 1967, Goss v. Board of Education, 270 F.Supp. 903 , and as modified by the 1968 school cases, Green v.

Holt v. Board of Mayor

421 F. Supp. 363 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 16, 1976

Draeger v. Grand Central, Inc., C.A.10th *364 (1974), 504 F.2d 142, 146 [7]. For such reason, the plaintiff failed to state a claim herein against Kuhn’s Big K Stores, Incorporated, on which relief can be granted.