Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstned

1,717 results

1.51s

  • Mose & Garrison Siskin Memorial Foundation, Inc. v. United States

    603 F. Supp. 91 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 4, 1984

    Salley v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. [896] at 903; Kay v. Commissioner, 44 T.C. 660, 672 (1965); Dean v. Commissioner, 35 T.C. 1083, 1085 (1961); Emmons v. Commissioner, 31 T.C. 26, 30 (1958), aff’d sub nom. Weller v. … Consequently, the bill contains two amendments with respect to tax-exempt organizations generally: the so-called Clay-Brown provision which encompasses “debt-financed income” within the scope of “unrelated business income

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pedigo v. Unum Life Insurance

    180 F.R.D. 324 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 24, 1997

    Before the Board of Medical Examiners, Dr. … Roque v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, 502 Pa. 615 , 467 A.2d 1128 (1983); Krulls v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, 144 A.D.2d 744 , 535 N.Y.S.2d 157 (1988); Sanders v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Washington County Department of Education

    District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 13, 2020

    But see Paul v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sharp v. Valley Forge Life Insurance

    490 F. Supp. 2d 909 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 15, 2007

    Harrell v. Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co., 937 S.W.2d 809, 814 (Tenn.1996). When the provisions of an insurance policy are clear and unambiguous, the Court’s construction of the policy should favor neither party. Brown v. … v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ogle v. Jones

    District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 21, 2024

    Specifically, Defendants objected to former HR Director Russell Bearden testifying to Nicole Lucas and Angela Brown’s sexual harassment allegations against Jones. [Doc. 155 at 34–38]. … Third, Defendants did not object to the admission of the Anderson County Board of Commissioners’ Censure Resolution of Jones. [Id. at 67].

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Grant v. Tennessee Valley Authority

    49 F. Supp. 564 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 31, 1942

    United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 213, 221 , 1 S.Ct. 240, 254, 261 , 27 L.Ed. 171 ; Sloan Shipyards Corp. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., 258 U.S. 549, 567 , 42 S.Ct. 386, 388 , 66 L.Ed. 762 . … Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Ala., 1936, 297 U.S. 288 , 56 S.Ct. 466 , 80 L.Ed. 688 , affirming Tennessee Valley Authority v. Ashwander, 5 Cir., 78 F.2d 578 , reversing Ashwander v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Winfree v. Morrison, Inc.

    762 F. Supp. 1310 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 20, 1990

    Monroe v. Standard Oil Co., 452 U.S. 549, 558-559 , 101 S.Ct. 2510, 2516 , 69 L.Ed.2d 226 (1981); Burkart v. Post-Browning, Inc., 859 F.2d 1245, 1247 (6th Cir.1988). … See Henry v. Anderson County, 522 F.Supp. 1112, 1115 (E.D.Tenn.1981).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Turner v. United States

    139 F. Supp. 30 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 13, 1954

    Daffinrud v. *31 United States, 7 Cir., 145 F.2d 724 ; Grayson v. Deal, D.C., 85 F.Supp. 431 ; Rothwell v. Pennsylvania R. Co., D.C., 87 F.Supp. 706 . The proof offered was sketchy. … Co. v. Derr, 6 Cir., 240 F. 73 ; Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. O’Neill, 6 Cir., 211 F.2d 190 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McCleary v. QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC

    District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 22, 2025

    Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 251–52 (1986). … See Elmhirst v. McLaren N. Mich., 726 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bailey v. Loyd

    393 F. Supp. 1224 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 4, 1974

    Bailey’s classification were not arbitrary or capricious but, rather, in accord with the established rules and regulations of state board of regents of Tennessee. As stated hereinbefore, Mrs. … See Hooban v. Boling, supra, 371 F.Supp. at 1113-1114 [3]. The plaintiff Mrs. Bailey is allowed 20 days herefrom in which to set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial herein.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brady v. Washington County, Tenn.

    509 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 23, 1980

    Board of Ed. of Memphis City Schools, C.A. 6th (1979), 611 F.2d 624 , because none of the unproductive efforts were frivolous or advanced in bad faith. … Board of Ed. of Memphis City Schools, supra, the claimants seem to think they discharged their burden when they proved the number of hours of service they provided the plaintiffs as well as the customary hourly rate in the

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United Steelworkers v. Knoxville Iron Co.

    162 F. Supp. 366 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 21, 1958

    Mascari v. International Brotherhood, etc., 187 Tenn. 345, 354 , 215 S.W.2d 779 , 782. The Supreme Court again had before it these statutes in the case of Pruitt v. Lambert, 1957. … Al-goma Plywood & Veneer Company v. Wisconsin Emp. Relations Board, 336 U.S. 301 , 69 S.Ct. 584 , 93 L.Ed. 691 ; Local Union No. 10, etc., v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Baxter

    536 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 5, 1982

    See in addition to the decisions *15 cited hereinabove: Studen v. Beebe, C.A. 6th (1978), 588 F.2d 560, 566 [4]; Sullivan v. Brown, C.A. 6th (1976), 544 F.2d 279, 284 [9]; Baker v. … In Monell v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • United States v. Bower

    95 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 8, 1951

    United States v. National Ass’n of Real Estate Boards, 339 U. S. 485 , 70 S.Ct. 711 ; Helvering v. Mitchell, 203 U.S. 391 , 58 S.Ct. 630 , 82 L.Ed. 917 . … In Frank v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Young v. Kellex Corporation

    82 F. Supp. 953 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 2, 1948

    In Brown v. State of Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419, 438 , 25 U.S. 419, 438 , 6 L.Ed. 678 , Chief Justice Marshall said: “No goods would be imported, if none could be sold.” … In Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board, 301 U.S. 103 , 57 S.Ct. 650, 654 , 81 L.Ed. 953 , the profit motive appeared as an ingredient of commerce.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hutto v. Benson

    110 F. Supp. 355 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 3, 1953

    The accident occurred in Texas where plaintiff, proceeding under the workmen’s compensation law of that State, received compensation benefits by way of a compromise settlement approved by the Texas compensation board. … McKissick v. McKissick, 25 Tenn. 75 ; Lally v. Holland, 31 Tenn. 396 ; King v. Doolittle, 38 Tenn. 77 ; Estes v. Kyle, 19 Tenn. 34 ; Fitzsimmons v. Johnson, 90 Tenn. 416 , 17 S.W. 100 ; Barbour v.

    Reversed by Hutto v. Benson Newark Ins. Co. v. Benson, 212 F.2d 349 (1954)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Califano

    444 F. Supp. 857 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 27, 1977

    Begley v. Mathews, 544 F.2d 1345 (6th Cir. 1976). … Elmer Engelman, an internist and diplómate of the American Board of Internal Medicine, with forty years’ experience, read the three X-rays serially.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fulton Bellows, LLC v. Federal Insurance

    662 F. Supp. 2d 976 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 21, 2009

    Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Carter v. Taylor

    409 F. Supp. 1162 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 25, 1975

    Phillips v. Johns, C.A.Tenn. (1930), 12 Tenn.App. 354, 357 (headnote 1), certiorari denied (1931). … Lake Carriers’ Asso. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lasater v. Hercules Powder Co.

    73 F. Supp. 264 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 29, 1947

    Others, moved by patriotic fervor, gave of their time and their talents in sundry activities such as the Red Cross, Selective Service Boards, Ration Boards, Bond Sales, etc. … Broderick, 10 Cir., 144 F.2d 348 ; Bell v. Porter, 7 Cir., 159 F.2d 117 ; Barksdale v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc., D.C., 70 F.Supp. 690 ; Anderson v. Federal Cartridge Corp., D.C.Minn., 72 F.Supp. 644 . 6 Alabama v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.