Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstned

1,717 results

1.15s

  • Piper v. Swan

    319 F. Supp. 908 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 4, 1970

    Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536, 554-555 , 85 S.Ct. 453 , 13 L.Ed.2d 471 (1965). Plaintiff contends that Mills v. Alabama, supra, supports his position. … One case stated: “The purpose [of a statute creating a misdemeanor for electioneering within 150 feet of the polls] is to prevent interference with the efficient handling of the voters by the election board and to prevent

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co.

    281 F. Supp. 944 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 5, 1967

    In Adams Express Co. v. … Co. v. Johnson & Fleming, 116 Tenn. 624 , 94 S.W. 600 ; Machine Co. v. Union Compress & Storage Co., 105 Tenn. 187 , 58 S.W. 270 . See also Kerr Steamship Co., Inc. v. R. C.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Eady v. Bryant

    District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 30, 2023

    (quoting Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 504 (1983)). “An officer may reasonably use lethal force against a pet that poses an ‘imminent threat.’” Id. (quoting Brown v. … Trihealth, Inc. v. Board of Comm’rs, 430 F.3d 783, 787 (6th Cir. 2005). Bare allegations of discriminatory intent are insufficient at summary judgment. See Mitchell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

    246 F. Supp. 758 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 21, 1965

    Kreiger v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 1 F.R.D. 601 (D.C., 1939); Brown v. Boston & M. R. Co., 283 Mass. 192 , 186 N.E. 59 (1933); Noesen v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. … Stark v. Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee R. Co., 203 F.2d 786 (1953). The validity of a release under F.E.L.A. is a question of federal law. Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Henson v. Atchley

    453 F. Supp. 555 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 27, 1978

    This is an action challenging apportionment plans for the Sevier County Quarterly Court and County School Board that were adopted subsequent to the approval of an amendment to the Tennessee State Constitution in March, 1978 … See Harman v. Forssenius, 380 U.S. 528, 534 , 85 S.Ct. 1177 , 14 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hoagland v. Tennessee Valley Authority

    34 F.R.D. 458 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 24, 1963

    Stark v. American Dredging Co., (D.C.E.D.Pa.) 3 F.R.D. 300 ; Henderson v. Southern Railway Company, (D.C.E.D.Tenn.N.D.) 17 F.R.D. 349 ; United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States, D.C., 186 F.Supp. 824 . … Maginnis v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., D.C., 207 F.Supp. 739, 740 . The Sixth Circuit held in the case of Sachs v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hines v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

    235 F. Supp. 695 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 19, 1964

    See: Bryan v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 174 Tenn. 602 , 130 S.W.2d 85 . … Bryan v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 25 Tenn.App. 496, 502 , 160 S.W.2d 423 . See: Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Ass’n v. Denton, 22 Tenn.App. 495, 505 , 124 S.W.2d 278 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Green v. Williams

    541 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 17, 1982

    Northcross v. Board of Ed. of Memphis City Schools, C.A. 6th (1979), 611 F.2d 624, 638 [29]. … Northcross v. Board of Ed. of Memphis City Schools, supra, 611 F.2d at 639-640 [38].

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cavender v. US Xpress Enterprises, Inc.

    191 F. Supp. 2d 962 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 8, 2002

    Life Ins., 841 F.Supp. at 818 , (quoting Freeman v. … See also Clinard v. Blackwood, 46 S.W.3d 177, 183 (Tenn.2001); Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Cleveland Mall Associates, 841 F.Supp. 815, 816 (E.D.Tenn.1993) 2 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jones

    336 F. Supp. 41 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 3, 1972

    Rios v. United States (1960), 364 U.S. 253, 261-262 , 80 S.Ct. 1431 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1688, 1694 (headnote 7), cited in Wilson v. … Robertson v. State (1947), 184 Tenn. 277, 284 (5), 198 S.W. 2d 633 , cited in United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Weinberger

    414 F. Supp. 96 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 1, 1975

    Consolidated Edison *98 Co. v. Labor Board [(1938)], 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . … Labor Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. (1939), 306 U.S. 292, 300 , 59 S.Ct. 501 , 83 L.Ed. 660, 665 . * * * ” Consolo v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Amarite v. Greene County, Tennessee

    District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 26, 2022

    At that time, Tyler Brown was already housed in A-pod [Doc. 37-4 at 10]. … See Brown v. Lewis, 779 F.3d 401, 411 (6th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, Defendants Morrison, Holt, Willett, and Cutshall are entitled to qualified immunity and will be dismissed. B.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Management Investors v. United Mine Workers of America

    459 F. Supp. 90 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 26, 1978

    See National Labor Relations Board v. International Rice Milling Co., Inc., 341 U.S. 665 , 71 S.Ct. 961 , 95 L.Ed. 1277 (1951); Riverside Coal Co. v. … Souder v. McGuire, 423 F.Supp. 830, 833 (M.D.Pa.1976).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

    District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 30, 2024

    Id. at *10 (citing Rudd v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 531 F. App'x 719, 727 (6th Cir. 2013); Brown v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 602 F. App'x 328, 331 (6th Cir. 2015)). … First, as noted in Browning, the Sixth Circuit rejected a similar argument in Mokbel-Aljahmi v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 732 F. App'x 395, 401 (6th Cir. 2018). Browning, 2021 WL 1169370 at *9.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. One 1942 Plymouth Sedan Automobile, Motor No. P14-24196

    89 F. Supp. 884 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 11, 1950

    Byars v. United States, 273 U.S. 28, 33 , 47 S.Ct. 248 , 71 L.Ed. 520 ; Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 65 L.Ed. 1048 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; Marron v. United States, 9 Cir., 8 F.2d 251 ; United States v. … Brown, D.C., 8 F.2d 630 . Whether claimant’s automobile is subject to forfeiture depends on whether the automobile was guilty of the violation charged.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

    263 F. Supp. 70 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 19, 1967

    Husted v. Consumers Power Co. v. Her-tel Deyo Co., 376 Mich. 41 , 135 N.W.2d 370 (1965); Trammell v. … See Maio v. Fahs, (1940) 339 Pa. 180 , 14 A.2d 105 ; Brown v. Dickey, 397 Pa. 454 , 155 A.2d 836 ; Stark v. Posh Construction Co., 192 Pa.Super. 409 , 162 A.2d 9 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Holt v. Utility Trailers Manufacturing Co.

    494 F. Supp. 510 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 13, 1980

    See Becker v. … Rule 403, Federal Rules of Evidence. “ * * * A courtroom is not a research laboratory. * * * ” United States v. Brown, C.A. 6th (1977), 557 F.2d 541, 556 . The motion hereby is DENIED. 1 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Semko v. EdFinancial Services, LLC

    District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 27, 2025

    Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983); see also Shane Grp., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016). … See Kondash v. Kia Motors America, Inc., 767 F. App'x 635, 638 (6th Cir. 2019).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Easterly v. Dempster

    112 F. Supp. 214 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 5, 1953

    Beal v. Holcombe, 5 Cir., 193 F.2d 384 ; Harris v. City of Daytona Beach, D. C., 105 F.Supp. 572 ; Lawrence v. Hancock, D. C., 76 F.Supp. 1004 . See also Kern v. … Muir v. Louisville Park Theatrical Ass’n, 6 Cir., 202 F.2d 275 ; Gray v. Board of Trustees of University of Tennessee, D. C., 100 F.Supp. 113 ; McSwain v. County Board of Education of Anderson County, D.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cummings v. Royal Indemnity Co.

    264 F. Supp. 189 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 17, 1967

    This Court, in cases tried prior to the decision in the case of Shores v. … He now receives $1.55 per hour because of an across-the-board raise in wages. For an employee who is well and able, his present job would involve the shoveling of about a ton of sand each shift.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.