Case law

Gaston v. Gibson

328 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 3, 1969

Chamberlain v. Brown, Tenn., 442 *6 S.W.2d 248 (1969). Furthermore, federal courts have held that damages under the civil rights statutes are governed by federal common law. Basista v. … Rhoads v. Horvat, 270 F.Supp. 307 (D.Col., 1967); Brooks v. Moss, 242 F.Supp. 531 (W.D.S.C., 1965); McArthur v. Pennington, 253 F.Supp. 420 (this Court, 1963); Rue v.

Dennis v. Southeastern Aviation, Inc.

176 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 10, 1959

See, also, Dittmar v. … In the case of Roosevelt Field v.

United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hughes

278 F. Supp. 733 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 16, 1967

Henry v. … Cf. 56 Am.Jur. 714, supra; Brown v. Alabama Power Co. (1963), 275 Ala. 467, 471 [5], 156 So.2d 153, 157 .

Fletcher v. Commissioner of Civil Service

329 F. Supp. 1398 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 4, 1971

This appropriate authority, Ainsworth v. … * * * ”, citing People of State of California v.

Bray v. Consolidated Coal Co.

286 F. Supp. 1019 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 20, 1968

In the case of Adams v. … See also the cases of Imperial Shirt Corp. v. Jenkins, Tenn., 399 S.W.2d 757 ; Griffitts v. Humphrey, 199 Tenn. 528 , 288 S.W.2d 1 ; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Jackson, 206 Tenn. 272 , 332 S.W.2d 674 ; Brown Shoe Company v.

Lewis v. Pennington

257 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 15, 1966

Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 379 U S. 203, 211, 85 S.Ct. 398, 403 , 13 L.Ed. 2d 233 . … International Union, etc. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 336 U.S. 245, 253 , 69 S.Ct. 516 , 93 L.Ed. 651 .

Bush v. Taylor (In Re Taylor & Associates, L.P.)

249 B.R. 474 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 23, 1998

Brown, 39 Tenn.App. 28 , 281 S.W.2d 64, 67 (1955). In Wyatt , the court stated, “We think that the greater weight of the evidence showed that Brown and Dearing were partners.” … Ingram v. State Industries, Inc., 943 S.W.2d 381, 383 (Tenn.1995); Middleton v. Allegheny Elec. Co., Inc., 897 S.W.2d 695, 697-98 (Tenn.1995).

University of Tennessee v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

573 F. Supp. 795 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 29, 1983

Id,.; 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(v)(1)(M). … Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital v. Schweiker, slip. op. at 3.

Duncan v. CITY OF ONEIDA, TENN.

564 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 14, 1983

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). The State of Tennessee does not grant, by statute or otherwise, a right to continued public employment. See State ex rel. … Henderson v. Bentley, 500 F.Supp. 62 (E.D. Tenn.1980); Huddleston v. City of Murfreesboro, 635 S.W.2d 694 (Tenn.1982); State ex rel. Martin v. City of Memphis, 452 S.W.2d 346 .

United States v. Kerr

470 F. Supp. 278 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 31, 1978

[Footnote references omitted.] 60 Am.Jur.2d 22, Partnership, § 92, citing inter alia (as authority for the last statement hereinabove), Brown v. Brown, C.A. … James v.

McCleary v. QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 1, 2025

Louzon v. Ford Motor Co., 718 F.3d 556, 561 (6th Cir. 2013). “Orders in limine which exclude broad categories of evidence should rarely be employed.” Sperberg v. … In making this argument, Defendant Brown relies on Ragland v. Shelby Cnty., No. 2:22-cv- 2862, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152009 (W.D. Tenn.

Sudduth Bros. v. Kyanite Mining Corp.

270 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 17, 1967

Conwell v. White Water V. C. Co., 6 Fed.Cas. 372, 4 Biss. 195 ; Speigle v. … Greeley v.

United States v. Ramsey

539 F. Supp. 1062 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 17, 1982

Defendant was advised that he owed $1,950.07, and that he had one year to appeal to the Veterans’ Administration Board of Appeals. Defendant did not exercise his right to appeal. … Johnson v. Robison, 415 U.S. 361, 373 , 94 S.Ct. 1160, 1168 , 39 L.Ed.2d 389 (1974).

Seals v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

924 F. Supp. 854 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 22, 1996

Northwest Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 657, 660-61 (9th Cir.1990) (action for wrongful failure to allow boarding not preempted); Miller v. … Express Airlines I, Inc., 825 F.Supp. 831, 833 (W.D.Tenn.1993) (action by handicapped passenger for false imprisonment by refusing boarding preempted); Margolis v.

Loveday v. Davis

559 F. Supp. 811 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 2, 1981

Brown v. Allen (1953), 344 U.S. 443, 458 , 73 S.Ct. 397, 407 , 97 L.Ed. 469, 489 (headnote 5); accord (as to a Fourth Amendment claim): Bradley v. … Love-day’s Plymouth automobile, brown in color, on suspicion of driving while intoxicated and possessing, in violation of a local ordinance, an open beer-can.

Harrison v. Landmark Community Publications of Tennessee, Inc.

892 F. Supp. 199 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 31, 1995

In Cameron v. … The opinion of Judge Jones in Sweeton v. Brown, 27 F.3d 1162, 1172-73 (6th Cir.1994), is a dissenting opinion, and so does not state the law in this circuit. In Palmer v.

Duck River Preservation Ass'n v. Tennessee Valley Authority

410 F. Supp. 758 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 6, 1974

The intervening defendants the cities of Columbia, Shelbyville, Tullahoma and Lewisburg, Tennessee are Tennessee municipal corporations, and the board of public utilities of the city of Columbia, the Tullahoma utility board … . * * * ” Environmental Defense Fund v. T. V.

Allsopp v. Hare

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 4, 2020

They also maintain that, because Coffee County cannot be held liable under § 1983 unless Plaintiff proves he was subjected to excessive force by Defendant Hare, see Board of Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1994), bifurcation of the trial would streamline the trial process [Id. at 2-3].

Ward v. Robinson

496 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 1, 1978

Athletic Ass’n v. … Cox, (1968), 221 Tenn. 164 , 425 S.W.2d 597, 602 [4], Neither does this Court think that the plaintiff was entitled to any sort of a due process hearing. 2 See generally Board of Curators, Univ. of Mo. v.

Steward v. Tollett

323 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 22, 1971

Ronnie Cogdill in the early morning hours of Saturday, September 14, 1968 on information that the felony of rape had been committed by a Negro man wearing a moustache and goatee and a brown checked shirt with a V-neck. … a jury chosen by excluding veniremen simply because they voiced general objections to the death penalty or expressed scruples against its infliction, so that the jury was “ * * * organized to convict. * * *” Witherspoon v.