Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,717 results
1.07s
390 F. Supp. 1031 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 29, 1974
In Winchester v. … Thomas v. Hycon, Inc., 244 F.Supp. 151 (D.C.D.C.1965) (interpreting Maryland law) ; Gordon v. Hollywood-Beaufort Package Corp., 213 S.C. 438 , 49 S.E.2d 718 (1948) ; Brown v. Moorhead Oil Co., 239 S.
Cited 28 timesPublished344 F. Supp. 680 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 15, 1972
As has been observed: * * * [T]he Act requires that ‘each creditor shall disclose clearly and conspicuously, in accordance with the regulations of the Board, to each person to whom consumer credit is extended and upon whom … Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc., C.A. 5th (1971), 449 F.2d 235, 240 .
Cited 8 timesPublished535 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 7, 1981
See United States v. Mauro (1978), 436 U.S. 340, 358 , 98 S.Ct. 1834, 1846 , 56 L.Ed.2d 329, 346 [6], and United States v. Dixon, C.A. 6th (1979), 592 F.2d 329, 332, n. 3 . … By order of March 31, 1981, in United States v. McKinily Brown, no.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEmployers Insurance v. Federal Deposit Insurance
112 F.R.D. 52 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 21, 1986
Abramovitz v. Ahern, 96 *55 F.R.D. 208, 215 (D.Conn.1982) (emphasis added). For example, if voter registration applicants were to sue individually some might prevail against the Election Board while others might lose. … This would put the Election Board in a conflicted position because it would never be certain whether or not to register the affected applicants. See Shivelhood v. Davis, 336 F.Supp. 1111 (D.Vt.1971).
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 24, 2019
See Deitz v. … Brown did not honor her request to appeal her sentence. See Pinchon v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFirst American National Bank Eastern v. Federal Deposit Insurance
600 F. Supp. 383 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 23, 1984
V. … Warder v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSalary Policy Employee Panel v. Tennessee Valley Authority
439 F. Supp. 1134 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 18, 1977
As Justice Douglas pointed out, in United Steelworkers v. … Judge Northrop, in Local 1852, Waterfront Guards Ass’n v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOlmstead v. Community Action Services of Morgan County, Inc.
494 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 24, 1980
The Board of CASMC, Inc., again acting on the advice of Mr. Osborne of HEW, advertised for applications for all positions available. … See Griffith v. Beii-Whitley Community Action Agency, 614 F.2d 1102 (6th Cir. 1980). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case be, and the same hereby is, dismissed. Order Accordingly.
Cited 0 timesPublished30 F.R.D. 41 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 26, 1962
In support of its insistences, defendant relies upon the cases of Baker v. Waterman S. S. Corp. (Jones v. Waterman S. S. … Signal Mountain Portland Cement Co. v. Brown, (C.A. 6) 141 F.2d 471, 476 . Present order sustaining the motion. . “(a) Consolidation.
Cited 2 timesPublished435 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 7, 1977
Consolidated Edison Co. v. Labor Board [1938], 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . … Labor Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. [1939], 306 U.S. 292, 300 , 59 S.Ct. 501, 505 , 83 L.Ed. 660, 665 . * * * ” Consolo v.
Cited 3 timesPublished395 F. Supp. 1174 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 4, 1974
Consolidated Edison Co. v. Labor Board, [(1938)] 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . … Labor Board v. Columbia Enameling & Stamping Co., [(1939)] 306 U.S. 292, 300 , 59 S.Ct. 501 , 83 L.Ed. 660, 665 , * * *” Consolo v.
Cited 2 timesPublished458 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 16, 1978
Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 . … Rowe v. General Motors Corp., 457 F.2d 348, 358-59 (5th Cir. 1972), but was rejected in favor of better qualified candidates from the viewpoint of bona fide job requirements. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedInryco, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority
471 F. Supp. 59 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 26, 1979
SEC Investor Protection Corp. v. Barbour, 421 U.S. 412 , 95 S.Ct. 1733 , 44 L.Ed.2d 263 (1975); Passenger Corp. v. Passengers Association, 414 U.S. 453 , 94 S.Ct. 690 , 38 L.Ed.2d 646 (1974). … Business Equipment, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 430 F.Supp. 699 (E.D.Tenn.1975), aff’d 556 F.2d 581 (6th Cir. 1977).
Cited 2 timesPublished612 F. Supp. 603 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 21, 1985
University of Tennessee v. Peoples Bank, 157 Tenn. 87 , 6 S.W.2d 328 (1928). … The State of Tennessee has waived sovereign immunity only to the extent provided in statutes creating an administrative remedy in the State Board of Claims and in Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-10-101 authorizing contract
Cited 11 timesPublishedWagner v. Burlington Industries, Inc.
47 F.R.D. 146 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 19, 1969
The jury determined factually, see Caldwell v. Knox Concrete Products, C.A.Tenn. (1964), 54 Tenn. … Mountain Portland Cement Company v. Brown, C. A.6th (1944), 141 F.2d 471, 475 [3]. Wrong cannot be licensed, permitting a wrongdoer to appropriate to its own use the property of another.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 29, 2023
Corp. v. … See Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 373 (1987); Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 557 (1974).
Cited 0 timesUnknown713 F. Supp. 2d 717 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 9, 2010
Judge Shirley also asked Respondent to file a description of the nature and extent of the conflict and to contact the Board of Professional Responsibility (“Board”) to see when the Board would make a decision on whether Respondent … (citations omitted); Marinangeli v.
Cited 0 timesPublished313 F. Supp. 1267 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 28, 1970
Jenson v. Olson, 353 F.2d 825 (C.A. 8, 1965); Frazier v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, 363 F.2d 861 (C.A. 5, 1966). The statute of limitation may also bar this suit. The complaint was filed July 29, 1969. … Mulligan v. Schlachter, 389 F.2d 231, 233 (C.A. 6, 1968), quoted in Williams v. Hollins, 428 F.2d 1221 (C.A. 6, January 7, 1970).
Cited 7 timesPublished998 F. Supp. 836 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 10, 1997
Board of Education of City of Chicago, 302 U.S. 74, 79 , 58 S.Ct. 98 , 82 L.Ed. 57 (1937); Pittman v. … United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839 , 116 S.Ct. 2432 , 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996) (contracts entered into between savings and loan corporations and Federal Home Loan Bank Board); Perry v.
Cited 0 timesPublished470 F. Supp. 263 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 22, 1978
Morrison v. … United States v.
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna