Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstned

1,717 results

1.07s

  • Latham v. Technar, Inc.

    390 F. Supp. 1031 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 29, 1974

    In Winchester v. … Thomas v. Hycon, Inc., 244 F.Supp. 151 (D.C.D.C.1965) (interpreting Maryland law) ; Gordon v. Hollywood-Beaufort Package Corp., 213 S.C. 438 , 49 S.E.2d 718 (1948) ; Brown v. Moorhead Oil Co., 239 S.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Wachtel v. West

    344 F. Supp. 680 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 15, 1972

    As has been observed: * * * [T]he Act requires that ‘each creditor shall disclose clearly and conspicuously, in accordance with the regulations of the Board, to each person to whom consumer credit is extended and upon whom … Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc., C.A. 5th (1971), 449 F.2d 235, 240 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • United States v. Price

    535 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 7, 1981

    See United States v. Mauro (1978), 436 U.S. 340, 358 , 98 S.Ct. 1834, 1846 , 56 L.Ed.2d 329, 346 [6], and United States v. Dixon, C.A. 6th (1979), 592 F.2d 329, 332, n. 3 . … By order of March 31, 1981, in United States v. McKinily Brown, no.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Employers Insurance v. Federal Deposit Insurance

    112 F.R.D. 52 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 21, 1986

    Abramovitz v. Ahern, 96 *55 F.R.D. 208, 215 (D.Conn.1982) (emphasis added). For example, if voter registration applicants were to sue individually some might prevail against the Election Board while others might lose. … This would put the Election Board in a conflicted position because it would never be certain whether or not to register the affected applicants. See Shivelhood v. Davis, 336 F.Supp. 1111 (D.Vt.1971).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Cormier v. United States

    District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 24, 2019

    See Deitz v. … Brown did not honor her request to appeal her sentence. See Pinchon v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • First American National Bank Eastern v. Federal Deposit Insurance

    600 F. Supp. 383 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 23, 1984

    V. … Warder v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Salary Policy Employee Panel v. Tennessee Valley Authority

    439 F. Supp. 1134 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 18, 1977

    As Justice Douglas pointed out, in United Steelworkers v. … Judge Northrop, in Local 1852, Waterfront Guards Ass’n v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Olmstead v. Community Action Services of Morgan County, Inc.

    494 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 24, 1980

    The Board of CASMC, Inc., again acting on the advice of Mr. Osborne of HEW, advertised for applications for all positions available. … See Griffith v. Beii-Whitley Community Action Agency, 614 F.2d 1102 (6th Cir. 1980). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case be, and the same hereby is, dismissed. Order Accordingly.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allen v. United Mine Workers

    30 F.R.D. 41 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 26, 1962

    In support of its insistences, defendant relies upon the cases of Baker v. Waterman S. S. Corp. (Jones v. Waterman S. S. … Signal Mountain Portland Cement Co. v. Brown, (C.A. 6) 141 F.2d 471, 476 . Present order sustaining the motion. . “(a) Consolidation.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Reeves v. Mathews

    435 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 7, 1977

    Consolidated Edison Co. v. Labor Board [1938], 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . … Labor Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. [1939], 306 U.S. 292, 300 , 59 S.Ct. 501, 505 , 83 L.Ed. 660, 665 . * * * ” Consolo v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Salyer v. Weinberger

    395 F. Supp. 1174 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 4, 1974

    Consolidated Edison Co. v. Labor Board, [(1938)] 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126 . … Labor Board v. Columbia Enameling & Stamping Co., [(1939)] 306 U.S. 292, 300 , 59 S.Ct. 501 , 83 L.Ed. 660, 665 , * * *” Consolo v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Julian v. City of Knoxville

    458 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 16, 1978

    Senter v. General Motors Corp., 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 . … Rowe v. General Motors Corp., 457 F.2d 348, 358-59 (5th Cir. 1972), but was rejected in favor of better qualified candidates from the viewpoint of bona fide job requirements. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Inryco, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority

    471 F. Supp. 59 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 26, 1979

    SEC Investor Protection Corp. v. Barbour, 421 U.S. 412 , 95 S.Ct. 1733 , 44 L.Ed.2d 263 (1975); Passenger Corp. v. Passengers Association, 414 U.S. 453 , 94 S.Ct. 690 , 38 L.Ed.2d 646 (1974). … Business Equipment, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 430 F.Supp. 699 (E.D.Tenn.1975), aff’d 556 F.2d 581 (6th Cir. 1977).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Carlson v. Highter

    612 F. Supp. 603 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 21, 1985

    University of Tennessee v. Peoples Bank, 157 Tenn. 87 , 6 S.W.2d 328 (1928). … The State of Tennessee has waived sovereign immunity only to the extent provided in statutes creating an administrative remedy in the State Board of Claims and in Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-10-101 authorizing contract

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Wagner v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

    47 F.R.D. 146 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 19, 1969

    The jury determined factually, see Caldwell v. Knox Concrete Products, C.A.Tenn. (1964), 54 Tenn. … Mountain Portland Cement Company v. Brown, C. A.6th (1944), 141 F.2d 471, 475 [3]. Wrong cannot be licensed, permitting a wrongdoer to appropriate to its own use the property of another.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gifford v. Phillip

    District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 29, 2023

    Corp. v. … See Board of Pardons v. Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 373 (1987); Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 557 (1974).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Bell

    713 F. Supp. 2d 717 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 9, 2010

    Judge Shirley also asked Respondent to file a description of the nature and extent of the conflict and to contact the Board of Professional Responsibility (“Board”) to see when the Board would make a decision on whether Respondent … (citations omitted); Marinangeli v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Snyder v. Swann

    313 F. Supp. 1267 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 28, 1970

    Jenson v. Olson, 353 F.2d 825 (C.A. 8, 1965); Frazier v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, 363 F.2d 861 (C.A. 5, 1966). The statute of limitation may also bar this suit. The complaint was filed July 29, 1969. … Mulligan v. Schlachter, 389 F.2d 231, 233 (C.A. 6, 1968), quoted in Williams v. Hollins, 428 F.2d 1221 (C.A. 6, January 7, 1970).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Stohler v. Menke

    998 F. Supp. 836 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 10, 1997

    Board of Education of City of Chicago, 302 U.S. 74, 79 , 58 S.Ct. 98 , 82 L.Ed. 57 (1937); Pittman v. … United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839 , 116 S.Ct. 2432 , 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996) (contracts entered into between savings and loan corporations and Federal Home Loan Bank Board); Perry v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Winstead

    470 F. Supp. 263 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 22, 1978

    Morrison v. … United States v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.