Case law

Larimer v. United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co.

428 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 29, 1976

Ruzicka v. General Motors Corporation, C.A. 6th (1975), 523 F.2d 306, 311 [7]; See v. … Ruzicka v. General Motors, supra, 523 F.2d at 311 [7], citing and quoting from Imel v.

Thomas v. Chamberlain

143 F. Supp. 671 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 5, 1955

Theilan v. Porter, 82 Tenn. 622 ; Jackson v. Bell, 143 Tenn. 452 , 226 S.W. 207 . The plaintiff’s right to recover is not affected by the validity or invalidity of the Ordinance. … Bricker v. Sims, 195 Tenn. 361 , 259 S.W.2d 661 , citing Roberts v. Roane County, 160 Tenn. 109 , 23 S.W.2d 239 and Beaver v. Hall, 142 Tenn. 416 , 217 S.W. 649 .

Duvoisin v. Kennerly, Montgomery, Howard & Finley (In re Southern Industrial Banking Corp.)

126 B.R. 294 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 12, 1991

In Nordberg v. … In Gropper v.

Jacobs v. Baylor School

957 F. Supp. 1002 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 16, 1996

Jacobs entered Baylor as a junior boarding student from Shreveport, Louisiana during the Fall of 1990 when she was sixteen (16) years old. … See Hunter v. Brown, No. 03A01-9504-CV-00127, 1996 WL 57944 , at p. *4 (Tenn.Ct.App.

Ramsey v. Tennessee Valley Authority

502 F. Supp. 230 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 29, 1980

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Justice Stevens in Bishop v.

Martin v. Sams

600 F. Supp. 71 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 30, 1984

Crumley v. Snead, 620 F.2d 481 (5th Cir.1980); Brown v. Nutsch, 619 F.2d 758 (8th Cir.1980); McBride v. Soos; 594 F.2d 610 (7th Cir.1979); Wirth v. … Siegel v. Edwards, 566 F.2d 958 (5th Cir.1978); Stockwell v. Friberg, 272 F.2d 386 (6th Cir.1959) (per curiam). 5 . 272 F.2d at 386 . 6 . See 45 A.L.R.Fed. 871 at 879 and 880 for a list of citations.

Arbuckle v. City of Chattanooga

696 F. Supp. 2d 907 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 8, 2010

Cunningham, 2003 WL 23471541 at *14 (citing Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997); Gregory, 220 F.3d at 442 ; Garner v. … Cunningham, 2003 WL 23471541 at *14 (citing Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 ; Monell, 436 U.S. at 690-91 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 ); see also Griffin v.

Gammons v. Adroit Medical Systems, Inc. (TV2)

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 26, 2021

made improper statements during the board meeting [Id. at 7–8]. … .”); Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 47 F. Supp. 3d 665, 706–07 (W.D. Tenn. 2014). 16 issue entirely.

Mosley v. Kelly

65 F. Supp. 2d 725 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 15, 1999

See K & T Enters., Inc. v. Zurich Ins. … Board of Comm’rs of Wabaunsee County, Kansas v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668, 675 , 116 S.Ct. 2342 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843 (1996).

United States v. Bush

172 F. Supp. 818 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 12, 1958

In Grau v. … Brown had a state search warrant. Kent had no Federal warrant.

Dyer v. Richardson

347 F. Supp. 478 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 8, 1972

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., [(1939)] 306 U.S. 292, 300 , 59 S.Ct. 501, 505 , 83 L.Ed. 660, 665 . * * * ” Consolo v.

Buchanan v. Apfel

69 F. Supp. 2d 996 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 30, 1999

Brown v. Wesley’s Quaker Maid, Inc., 771 F.2d 952, 954 (6th Cir.1985). … Rather, property interests “are created and their dimensions are defined by existing rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law .... ” Board of Regents v.

Moore v. Rose

392 F. Supp. 1266 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 18, 1974

United States v. Bass (1971), 404 U.S. 336, 347 , 92 S.Ct. 515 , 30 L.Ed.2d 488, 496 [3]; accord: United States v. McCreary, C.A.6th (1972), 455 F.2d 647, 649-650 [4], and United States v. … Brown, C.A.6th (1972), 458 F.2d 375, 376 [2]. Accordingly, the conviction of the movant Mr. Tommy Moore in United States of America, plaintiff, v.

Tennessee Valley Trades and Labor Council v. Tennessee Valley Authority

488 F. Supp. 146 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 15, 1980

In the case of United Steelworkers v. … See Chambers v.

Smith v. Union Carbide Corp.

231 F. Supp. 980 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 7, 1964

Pless v. Franks, 202 Tenn. 630 , 308 S.W.2d 402 ; Wyckoff v. Board of Administration of the Retirement System of the City of Memphis, 208 Tenn. 604 , 348 S.W.2d 289 . … See Bradley v. Pritchard, 254 N.C. 175 , 118 S.E.2d 422 .

Frazier v. Lane

446 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 6, 1977

As the procedural issue involved herein is not plainly frivolous but constitutes a substantial question worthy of further consideration, Manning v. … Rule 22(b), supra. * The Court considered also Townsend v. Sain (1963), 372 U.S. 293 , 83 S.Ct. 745 , 9 L.Ed.2d 770 , and Brown v.

Perry v. Carter County, Tennessee

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 29, 2019

Comm'rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997). … Harvey v. Campbell Cty., Tenn., 453 F.

Sherrod v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.

516 F. Supp. 46 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 11, 1979

R. v. … Brown admitted that his purpose in causing the warrant to be issued was to “ * * * get him [Mr.

Boles v. Bank of Knoxville

306 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 10, 1969

In Moffett v. … In Brown v. Brown, 368 F.2d 992 (C.A. 9, 1966) the Court held that a prisoner had stated a cause of action against the Governor of California, a warden of a prison, and their agents. In York v.

Gifford v. Hamilton County Government

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 13, 2024

Brown was arrested and booked into the Hamilton County Jail on an assault charge. But this fact alone is insufficient to show Mr. Brown posed a substantial risk to any other detainee in Foxtrot 2. See Davis v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 (1997) (citation omitted).